Audit and feedback is an effective implementation strategy to increase fidelity to a multi-component labor induction protocol designed to reduce obstetric inequities.

Rebecca F Hamm, Sreya Pattipati, Lisa D Levine, Samuel Parry, Sindhu K Srinivas, Rinad S Beidas
{"title":"Audit and feedback is an effective implementation strategy to increase fidelity to a multi-component labor induction protocol designed to reduce obstetric inequities.","authors":"Rebecca F Hamm, Sreya Pattipati, Lisa D Levine, Samuel Parry, Sindhu K Srinivas, Rinad S Beidas","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00681-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have demonstrated that standardizing labor induction (IOL), often with the use of protocols, may reduce racial inequities in obstetrics. IOL protocols are complex, multi-component interventions. To target identified implementation barriers, audit and feedback (A&F) was selected as an implementation strategy. Here, we aimed to understand the acceptability and effect of A&F on fidelity to this complex intervention through quantitative and qualitative approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis of a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (10/2018-12/2022) compared 2 years before (PRE) to 2 years after (POST) implementation of an IOL protocol at two sites. Fidelity to each of 8 specific protocol components was collected via chart review. During the POST period, unit-aggregated A&F reports were distributed via email every 3 months to site clinicians. Reports tracked fidelity to protocol components over time. For this analysis, we compared component fidelity PRE to POST-implementation. Additionally, during the POST period, we compared fidelity by month after each A&F (Month#1 v. Month#2/3) to evaluate the effect of A&F over time. Acceptability of A&F reports was evaluated using qualitative interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>8509 labor inductions were included (PRE = 4214, POST = 4295). A&F reports were successfully distributed every 3 months for the 2-year POST period. PRE to POST-implementation, fidelity to 4 of the 8 components increased significantly (cervical Foley utilization, latent labor examination frequency, amniotomy timing, and intrauterine pressure catheter utilization), without change in the other 4 components. For 2 of those 4 components where improvement was noted, there was no difference in fidelity by month after A&F report; rather, there was sustained improvement across the POST-implementation period. On the other hand, for the remaining 2 components, fidelity peaked in the first month after each A&F report, with some decline in the following 2 months prior to the next A&F report. Qualitative analysis (n = 24) supported A&F acceptability, with A&F described as \"motivating\" and \"helpful.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A&F was an effective implementation strategy to promote fidelity to certain components of this labor induction protocol. With some decline in effect after the first month POST-A&F report, increased A&F frequency should be considered in future work targeting obstetric outcomes, as well as health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00681-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies have demonstrated that standardizing labor induction (IOL), often with the use of protocols, may reduce racial inequities in obstetrics. IOL protocols are complex, multi-component interventions. To target identified implementation barriers, audit and feedback (A&F) was selected as an implementation strategy. Here, we aimed to understand the acceptability and effect of A&F on fidelity to this complex intervention through quantitative and qualitative approaches.

Methods: This secondary analysis of a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (10/2018-12/2022) compared 2 years before (PRE) to 2 years after (POST) implementation of an IOL protocol at two sites. Fidelity to each of 8 specific protocol components was collected via chart review. During the POST period, unit-aggregated A&F reports were distributed via email every 3 months to site clinicians. Reports tracked fidelity to protocol components over time. For this analysis, we compared component fidelity PRE to POST-implementation. Additionally, during the POST period, we compared fidelity by month after each A&F (Month#1 v. Month#2/3) to evaluate the effect of A&F over time. Acceptability of A&F reports was evaluated using qualitative interviews.

Results: 8509 labor inductions were included (PRE = 4214, POST = 4295). A&F reports were successfully distributed every 3 months for the 2-year POST period. PRE to POST-implementation, fidelity to 4 of the 8 components increased significantly (cervical Foley utilization, latent labor examination frequency, amniotomy timing, and intrauterine pressure catheter utilization), without change in the other 4 components. For 2 of those 4 components where improvement was noted, there was no difference in fidelity by month after A&F report; rather, there was sustained improvement across the POST-implementation period. On the other hand, for the remaining 2 components, fidelity peaked in the first month after each A&F report, with some decline in the following 2 months prior to the next A&F report. Qualitative analysis (n = 24) supported A&F acceptability, with A&F described as "motivating" and "helpful."

Conclusions: A&F was an effective implementation strategy to promote fidelity to certain components of this labor induction protocol. With some decline in effect after the first month POST-A&F report, increased A&F frequency should be considered in future work targeting obstetric outcomes, as well as health inequities.

审计和反馈是一种有效的实施策略,以提高对旨在减少产科不公平的多成分引产协议的保真度。
背景:研究表明,标准化引产(IOL),通常使用协议,可以减少产科的种族不平等。人工晶状体协议是复杂的,多组分干预。为了针对已确定的实施障碍,选择了审计和反馈(A&F)作为实施策略。在这里,我们旨在通过定量和定性的方法来了解A&F对这种复杂干预的可接受性及其对保真度的影响。方法:对一项I型混合有效性-实施试验(2018年10月至2022年12月)进行二次分析,比较两个地点实施IOL方案前2年(PRE)和后2年(POST)。通过图表审查收集8个特定协议组件的保真度。在POST期间,每3个月通过电子邮件将单位汇总的A&F报告分发给现场临床医生。报告跟踪了一段时间内协议组件的保真度。对于这个分析,我们比较了组件保真度PRE和post实现。此外,在POST期间,我们在每个A&F(第1个月vs .第2/3个月)之后按月比较保真度,以评估A&F随时间的影响。采用定性访谈对A&F报告的可接受性进行评估。结果:共纳入引产8509例(PRE = 4214, POST = 4295)。在两年的POST期间,A&F报告每3个月成功分发一次。实施前与实施后,8个指标中有4个指标的保真度显著增加(宫颈Foley利用率、潜在产程检查频率、羊膜切开时机和宫内压力导管的使用),其他4个指标无变化。对于这4个成分中的2个,在A&F报告后的一个月内,保真度没有差异;相反,整个执行后期间都有持续的改善。另一方面,对于剩下的两个组成部分,忠实度在每次A&F报告后的第一个月达到顶峰,在接下来的两个月里有所下降。定性分析(n = 24)支持A&F的可接受性,A&F被描述为“激励”和“有帮助”。结论:A&F是一种有效的实施策略,可以提高对引产方案某些部分的保真度。在报告后的第一个月,由于影响有所下降,在今后针对产科结果和卫生不平等的工作中,应考虑增加A&F频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信