Quality of caring interactions between nurses and patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey with nurses and patients in acute and community care

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jutta Ernst PhD, Heidi Petry PhD, RN, Rahel Naef PhD, RN
{"title":"Quality of caring interactions between nurses and patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey with nurses and patients in acute and community care","authors":"Jutta Ernst PhD,&nbsp;Heidi Petry PhD, RN,&nbsp;Rahel Naef PhD, RN","doi":"10.1111/inr.13089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To describe the characteristics and quality of caring interactions between nurses and patients during the earlier phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in acute and home care settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Nurse–patient interaction (NPI) plays an important role in effective, person-centered care delivery and has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The survey was part of a multimethod study and used a cross-sectional design. It included both nurses and patients receiving care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–June 2020) at a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital and two large public home care agencies. Data were collected from July to October 2020, using the Individualized Care Scale (ICS), patient and nurse versions. The ICS is a 5-point Likert-type scale divided into two dimensions: ICS-A and ICS-B with 17 items each. The ICS-A subscale assesses patients’ or nurses’ perceptions of patient individuality as supported by specific nursing activities. The aim of the ICS-B subscale, conversely, is to assess perceptions of how individuality is maintained in the care either provided or received. Inferential statistics were used for comparisons between settings and populations. The study followed the STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The survey was completed by 443 nurses and 295 patients. Patients’ perception of “nurses support their individuality” was moderate (ICS-A 3.42, range 1–5), as was their perception of “nurses provide individual care to patients” (ICS-B 3.89, range 1–5). Nurses’ own perception of supporting individuality was found to be high (ICS-A 4.30, range 1–5), as was the mean score of their actual provision of individual care (ICS-B 4.21, range 1–5), which was statistically significantly higher than the ratings of patients. Nurses working in home care rated individuality and individual care statistically significantly higher than those working in acute care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings suggest that during the earlier phases of the pandemic, Swiss nurses perceived their support of patient individuality and individual care to be higher than their European peers had prior to the pandemic and higher than patients did. However, those engaged in the provision of care within a hospital setting perceived the level of individuality and individual care to be lower than those engaged in the provision of care within a home care setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for nursing and health policy</h3>\n \n <p>It is evident that nurses’ efforts and contributions to the quality of care require organizational recognition and support. Their commitment should be recognized and supported by leadership and policymakers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54931,"journal":{"name":"International Nursing Review","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Nursing Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inr.13089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To describe the characteristics and quality of caring interactions between nurses and patients during the earlier phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in acute and home care settings.

Background

Nurse–patient interaction (NPI) plays an important role in effective, person-centered care delivery and has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

The survey was part of a multimethod study and used a cross-sectional design. It included both nurses and patients receiving care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–June 2020) at a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital and two large public home care agencies. Data were collected from July to October 2020, using the Individualized Care Scale (ICS), patient and nurse versions. The ICS is a 5-point Likert-type scale divided into two dimensions: ICS-A and ICS-B with 17 items each. The ICS-A subscale assesses patients’ or nurses’ perceptions of patient individuality as supported by specific nursing activities. The aim of the ICS-B subscale, conversely, is to assess perceptions of how individuality is maintained in the care either provided or received. Inferential statistics were used for comparisons between settings and populations. The study followed the STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies.

Results

The survey was completed by 443 nurses and 295 patients. Patients’ perception of “nurses support their individuality” was moderate (ICS-A 3.42, range 1–5), as was their perception of “nurses provide individual care to patients” (ICS-B 3.89, range 1–5). Nurses’ own perception of supporting individuality was found to be high (ICS-A 4.30, range 1–5), as was the mean score of their actual provision of individual care (ICS-B 4.21, range 1–5), which was statistically significantly higher than the ratings of patients. Nurses working in home care rated individuality and individual care statistically significantly higher than those working in acute care.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that during the earlier phases of the pandemic, Swiss nurses perceived their support of patient individuality and individual care to be higher than their European peers had prior to the pandemic and higher than patients did. However, those engaged in the provision of care within a hospital setting perceived the level of individuality and individual care to be lower than those engaged in the provision of care within a home care setting.

Implications for nursing and health policy

It is evident that nurses’ efforts and contributions to the quality of care require organizational recognition and support. Their commitment should be recognized and supported by leadership and policymakers.

COVID-19大流行期间护士和患者之间护理互动的质量:对急诊和社区护理护士和患者的横断面调查
目的:描述COVID-19大流行早期急性和家庭护理环境中护士与患者之间护理互动的特征和质量。背景:护患互动(NPI)在有效的、以人为本的护理服务中发挥着重要作用,并受到COVID-19大流行的影响。方法:本调查为多方法研究的一部分,采用横断面设计。该研究包括在第一波COVID-19大流行(2020年3月至6月)期间在一所大学附属三级护理医院和两家大型公立家庭护理机构接受护理的护士和患者。数据收集于2020年7月至10月,使用个性化护理量表(ICS),患者和护士版本。ICS是李克特式5分制量表,分为ICS- a和ICS- b两个维度,每个维度有17个项目。ICS-A子量表评估患者或护士对患者个性的感知,以特定护理活动为支持。相反,ICS-B子量表的目的是评估在提供或接受的护理中如何保持个性的看法。推断统计用于环境和群体之间的比较。本研究采用STROBE检查表进行横断面研究。结果:共443名护士和295名患者完成问卷调查。患者对“护士支持他们的个性”的感知是中等的(ICS-A 3.42,范围1-5),他们对“护士为患者提供个性化护理”的感知也是中等的(ICS-B 3.89,范围1-5)。结果发现,护士自身对支持个性的感知较高(ICS-A 4.30,范围1-5),其实际提供个体护理的平均得分较高(ICS-B 4.21,范围1-5),具有统计学显著性高于患者的评分。从事家庭护理的护士对个性和个人护理的评价显著高于从事急症护理的护士。结论:研究结果表明,在大流行的早期阶段,瑞士护士认为他们对患者个性和个人护理的支持程度高于大流行前的欧洲同行,也高于患者。然而,那些在医院环境中提供护理的人认为个性和个人护理的水平低于那些在家庭护理环境中提供护理的人。对护理和卫生政策的影响:很明显,护士对护理质量的努力和贡献需要组织的认可和支持。他们的承诺应得到领导层和决策者的认可和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Nursing Review is a key resource for nurses world-wide. Articles are encouraged that reflect the ICN"s five key values: flexibility, inclusiveness, partnership, achievement and visionary leadership. Authors are encouraged to identify the relevance of local issues for the global community and to describe their work and to document their experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信