Hand therapy utilization following digital flexor tendon repair: Trends, timing, predictive factors, and association with reoperation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Alexander J Kammien, Kevin G Hu, Catherine Yu, Jonathan N Grauer, David L Colen
{"title":"Hand therapy utilization following digital flexor tendon repair: Trends, timing, predictive factors, and association with reoperation.","authors":"Alexander J Kammien, Kevin G Hu, Catherine Yu, Jonathan N Grauer, David L Colen","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical rehabilitation is considered an important component of recovery following digital flexor tendon repair (FTR), but no studies have thoroughly characterized nationwide therapy utilization in the United States.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The current study characterized national trends in the timing and amount of hand therapy utilization following FTR and assessed factors associated with the lack of postoperative hand therapy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Zone II FTRs between 2010 and 2020 were identified in PearlDiver. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, concomitant procedures besides nerve repair, and follow-up in the database of <6 months. The occurrence, timing, and frequency of hand therapy within 6 months of surgery were identified. Odds of not receiving hand therapy were assessed based on clinical and nonclinical characteristics using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6700 FTRs identified, hand therapy was identified for 3319 (50%). The proportion of patients utilizing therapy increased from 2010 to 2020 (44%-56%, p < 0.001). Weekly therapy utilization peaked in postoperative week 4 (41% of all patients attended hand therapy). Lack of hand therapy utilization was associated with several clinical factors (male sex, lower Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score, decreasing number of repairs) and nonclinical factors (geographic region, Medicare insurance).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the reported importance of hand therapy following digital FTR, it may be underutilized in the United States. Patient factors associated with not using hand therapy suggest that more uniform clinical practice should be sought.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.07.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical rehabilitation is considered an important component of recovery following digital flexor tendon repair (FTR), but no studies have thoroughly characterized nationwide therapy utilization in the United States.

Purpose: The current study characterized national trends in the timing and amount of hand therapy utilization following FTR and assessed factors associated with the lack of postoperative hand therapy.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Zone II FTRs between 2010 and 2020 were identified in PearlDiver. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, concomitant procedures besides nerve repair, and follow-up in the database of <6 months. The occurrence, timing, and frequency of hand therapy within 6 months of surgery were identified. Odds of not receiving hand therapy were assessed based on clinical and nonclinical characteristics using logistic regression.

Results: Of 6700 FTRs identified, hand therapy was identified for 3319 (50%). The proportion of patients utilizing therapy increased from 2010 to 2020 (44%-56%, p < 0.001). Weekly therapy utilization peaked in postoperative week 4 (41% of all patients attended hand therapy). Lack of hand therapy utilization was associated with several clinical factors (male sex, lower Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score, decreasing number of repairs) and nonclinical factors (geographic region, Medicare insurance).

Conclusions: Despite the reported importance of hand therapy following digital FTR, it may be underutilized in the United States. Patient factors associated with not using hand therapy suggest that more uniform clinical practice should be sought.

指屈肌腱修复后手部治疗的应用:趋势、时机、预测因素和与再手术的关系。
背景:物理康复被认为是指屈肌腱修复(FTR)后恢复的重要组成部分,但没有研究彻底描述美国全国范围内的治疗使用情况。目的:本研究描述了FTR术后手部治疗使用时间和数量的全国趋势,并评估了与术后手部治疗缺乏相关的因素。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:选取2010 ~ 2020年珠光蝶II区ftr。排除标准包括年龄。结果:在发现的6700例ftr中,手部治疗被发现3319例(50%)。从2010年到2020年,接受治疗的患者比例有所增加(44%-56%),p结论:尽管报道了数字FTR后手部治疗的重要性,但在美国,这种治疗可能没有得到充分利用。与不使用手部疗法相关的患者因素提示应寻求更统一的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信