Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Treatment Response in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1200/CCI-24-00157
Vinayak S Ahluwalia, Ravi B Parikh
{"title":"Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Treatment Response in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Vinayak S Ahluwalia, Ravi B Parikh","doi":"10.1200/CCI-24-00157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated promise in the treatment of various cancers. Single-drug ICI therapy (immuno-oncology [IO] monotherapy) that targets PD-L1 is the standard of care in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression ≥50%. We sought to find out if a machine learning (ML) algorithm can perform better as a predictive biomarker than PD-L1 alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a real-world, nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database of 38,048 patients with advanced NSCLC, we trained binary prediction algorithms to predict likelihood of 12-month progression-free survival (PFS; 12-month PFS) and 12-month overall survival (OS; 12-month OS) from initiation of first-line therapy. We evaluated the algorithms by calculating the AUC on the test set. We plotted Kaplan-Meier curves and fit Cox survival models comparing survival between patients who were classified as low-risk (LR) for 12-month disease progression or 12-month mortality versus those classified as high-risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ML algorithms achieved an AUC of 0.701 (95% CI, 0.689 to 0.714) and 0.718 (95% CI, 0.707 to 0.730) for 12-month PFS and 12-month OS, respectively. Patients in the LR group had lower 12-month disease progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.50]; <i>P</i> < .001) and 12-month all-cause mortality (HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.34]; <i>P</i> < .0001) compared with the high-risk group. Patients deemed LR for disease progression and mortality on IO monotherapy were less likely to progress (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.61]; <i>P</i> < .0001) or die (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.37]; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with the high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An ML algorithm can more accurately predict response to first-line therapy, including IO monotherapy, in patients with advanced NSCLC, compared with PD-L1 alone. ML may better aid clinical decision making in oncology than a single biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated promise in the treatment of various cancers. Single-drug ICI therapy (immuno-oncology [IO] monotherapy) that targets PD-L1 is the standard of care in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1 expression ≥50%. We sought to find out if a machine learning (ML) algorithm can perform better as a predictive biomarker than PD-L1 alone.

Methods: Using a real-world, nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database of 38,048 patients with advanced NSCLC, we trained binary prediction algorithms to predict likelihood of 12-month progression-free survival (PFS; 12-month PFS) and 12-month overall survival (OS; 12-month OS) from initiation of first-line therapy. We evaluated the algorithms by calculating the AUC on the test set. We plotted Kaplan-Meier curves and fit Cox survival models comparing survival between patients who were classified as low-risk (LR) for 12-month disease progression or 12-month mortality versus those classified as high-risk.

Results: The ML algorithms achieved an AUC of 0.701 (95% CI, 0.689 to 0.714) and 0.718 (95% CI, 0.707 to 0.730) for 12-month PFS and 12-month OS, respectively. Patients in the LR group had lower 12-month disease progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.50]; P < .001) and 12-month all-cause mortality (HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.34]; P < .0001) compared with the high-risk group. Patients deemed LR for disease progression and mortality on IO monotherapy were less likely to progress (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.61]; P < .0001) or die (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.37]; P < .001) compared with the high-risk group.

Conclusion: An ML algorithm can more accurately predict response to first-line therapy, including IO monotherapy, in patients with advanced NSCLC, compared with PD-L1 alone. ML may better aid clinical decision making in oncology than a single biomarker.

可解释的机器学习预测晚期非小细胞肺癌的治疗反应。
目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在治疗各种癌症方面已经显示出前景。靶向PD-L1的单药ICI治疗(免疫肿瘤学[IO]单药治疗)是PD-L1表达≥50%的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的标准治疗方案。我们试图找出机器学习(ML)算法是否可以比单独使用PD-L1更好地作为预测性生物标志物。方法:使用真实世界的全国性电子健康记录衍生的未识别数据库,包括38,048例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,我们训练二元预测算法来预测12个月无进展生存(PFS;12个月PFS)和12个月总生存期(OS;开始一线治疗后12个月(OS)。我们通过计算测试集上的AUC来评估算法。我们绘制Kaplan-Meier曲线并拟合Cox生存模型,比较低危(LR)患者12个月疾病进展或12个月死亡率与高危患者的生存率。结果:ML算法的12个月PFS和12个月OS的AUC分别为0.701 (95% CI, 0.689至0.714)和0.718 (95% CI, 0.707至0.730)。LR组患者12个月的疾病进展较低(风险比[HR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.45 ~ 0.50];P < 0.001)和12个月全因死亡率(HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.29 ~ 0.34];P < 0.0001)。经IO单药治疗认为疾病进展为LR的患者和死亡率进展的可能性较小(HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.46至0.61];P < 0.0001)或死亡(HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.24 ~ 0.37];P < 0.001)。结论:与单独使用PD-L1相比,ML算法可以更准确地预测晚期NSCLC患者对一线治疗(包括IO单药治疗)的反应。ML可能比单一的生物标志物更有助于肿瘤学的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信