Quality of Sexual Life Before and After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Olga A E Wihersaari, Päivi Karjalainen, Anna-Maija Tolppanen, Nina Mattsson, Kari Nieminen, Jyrki Jalkanen
{"title":"Quality of Sexual Life Before and After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.","authors":"Olga A E Wihersaari, Päivi Karjalainen, Anna-Maija Tolppanen, Nina Mattsson, Kari Nieminen, Jyrki Jalkanen","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is generally associated with an improvement in sexual function, knowledge on specific changes is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe and compare changes in sexual activity and function during a 5-year follow-up period after POP surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a nationwide cohort study of 3,515 women operated on for POP in 2015 in Finland. Sexual activity and function were assessed preoperatively and 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years after native tissue and mesh-augmented surgery using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire Short Form (PISQ-12).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PISQ-12 score improved significantly at 6-month follow-up, regardless of surgical approach. Negative emotional reactions (relative risk [RR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.36), orgasm intensity (RR, 4.23; 95% CI, 2.94-6.07), and avoidance of sexual intercourse due to fear of incontinence (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.15-0.43) or bulging (RR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07-0.17) improved remarkably at 6 months and remained up to 5 years after surgery. Satisfaction (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18), coital pain (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99), and coital incontinence (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.15-0.43) improved only at 6-month follow-up. Among women with deteriorated sexual function, the decline was associated with loss of excitement and satisfaction, increased coital pain, and partner's erectile problems. Partner-related factors and lack of sexual desire were main reasons for sexual inactivity both preoperatively and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering patient's sexual wellbeing and informing them of the expected changes in individual sexual function items are important aspects of preoperative counseling. This may reduce false hopes regarding the effect of surgery on sexual function and improve postoperative patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":"30 10","pages":"838-846"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Although surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is generally associated with an improvement in sexual function, knowledge on specific changes is limited.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe and compare changes in sexual activity and function during a 5-year follow-up period after POP surgery.

Study design: This was a nationwide cohort study of 3,515 women operated on for POP in 2015 in Finland. Sexual activity and function were assessed preoperatively and 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years after native tissue and mesh-augmented surgery using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire Short Form (PISQ-12).

Results: The PISQ-12 score improved significantly at 6-month follow-up, regardless of surgical approach. Negative emotional reactions (relative risk [RR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.36), orgasm intensity (RR, 4.23; 95% CI, 2.94-6.07), and avoidance of sexual intercourse due to fear of incontinence (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.15-0.43) or bulging (RR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07-0.17) improved remarkably at 6 months and remained up to 5 years after surgery. Satisfaction (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18), coital pain (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99), and coital incontinence (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.15-0.43) improved only at 6-month follow-up. Among women with deteriorated sexual function, the decline was associated with loss of excitement and satisfaction, increased coital pain, and partner's erectile problems. Partner-related factors and lack of sexual desire were main reasons for sexual inactivity both preoperatively and postoperatively.

Conclusions: Considering patient's sexual wellbeing and informing them of the expected changes in individual sexual function items are important aspects of preoperative counseling. This may reduce false hopes regarding the effect of surgery on sexual function and improve postoperative patient satisfaction.

盆腔器官脱垂手术前后的性生活质量。
重要性:虽然手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)通常与性功能改善有关,但对具体变化的了解有限。目的:本研究的目的是描述和比较POP手术后5年随访期间性活动和功能的变化。研究设计:这是一项全国性队列研究,研究对象为2015年芬兰3515名接受POP手术的女性。使用盆腔器官脱出/尿失禁性问卷短表(PISQ-12)评估术前、术后6个月、2年和5年的性活动和功能。结果:无论采用何种手术方式,PISQ-12评分在随访6个月时均有显著改善。消极情绪反应(相对危险度[RR], 0.21;95%可信区间[CI], 0.13-0.36),性高潮强度(RR, 4.23;95% CI, 2.94-6.07),以及由于害怕尿失禁而避免性交(RR, 0.25;95% CI, 0.15-0.43)或鼓胀(RR, 0.11;95% CI, 0.07-0.17)在术后6个月显著改善,并维持至5年。满意度(RR, 1.10;95% CI, 1.04-1.18),性交疼痛(RR, 0.71;95% CI, 0.51-0.99)和性失禁(RR, 0.48;95% CI, 0.15-0.43)仅在6个月随访时改善。在性功能恶化的女性中,这种下降与兴奋感和满足感的丧失、性交疼痛的增加以及伴侣的勃起问题有关。术前和术后性行为不活跃的主要原因是伴侣相关因素和性欲不足。结论:术前咨询应考虑患者的性健康状况,并告知患者个体性功能指标的预期变化。这可以减少关于手术对性功能影响的错误希望,提高术后患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信