A quality assurance protocol for reliable and reproducible multi-TI arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging in rat livers.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Wan-Ting Zhao, Karl-Heinz Herrmann, Weiwei Wei, Martin Krämer, Uta Dahmen, Jürgen R Reichenbach
{"title":"A quality assurance protocol for reliable and reproducible multi-TI arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging in rat livers.","authors":"Wan-Ting Zhao, Karl-Heinz Herrmann, Weiwei Wei, Martin Krämer, Uta Dahmen, Jürgen R Reichenbach","doi":"10.1007/s10334-024-01223-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish an arterial spin labeling (ASL) protocol for rat livers that improves data reliability and reproducibility for perfusion quantification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used respiratory-gated, single-slice, FAIR-based ASL imaging with multiple inversion times (TI) in rat livers. Quality assurance measures included: (1) introduction of mechanical ventilation to ensure consistent respiratory cycles by controlling the respiratory rate (45 bpm), tidal volume (10 ml/kg), and inspiration: expiration ratio (I:E ratio, 1:2), (2) optimization of the trigger window for consistent trigger points, and (3) use of fit residual map and coefficient of variance as metrics to assess data quality. We compared image quality, perfusion maps, and fit residual maps between mechanically ventilated and non-ventilated animals, as well as repeated ASL measurements (session = 4 per animal) in two mechanically ventilated animals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perfusion measurements over multiple sessions in mechanically ventilated rats exhibited low perfusion data variability and high reproducibility both within and between liver lobes. Image quality and perfusion maps were significantly improved in mechanically ventilated animals compared to non-ventilated animals.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The implementation of mechanical ventilation and optimized quality assurance protocols enhanced the reliability and reproducibility of FAIR-based multi-TI-ASL imaging in rat livers. Our findings demonstrate these measures as a robust approach for achieving consistent liver perfusion quantification in preclinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01223-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To establish an arterial spin labeling (ASL) protocol for rat livers that improves data reliability and reproducibility for perfusion quantification.

Methods: This study used respiratory-gated, single-slice, FAIR-based ASL imaging with multiple inversion times (TI) in rat livers. Quality assurance measures included: (1) introduction of mechanical ventilation to ensure consistent respiratory cycles by controlling the respiratory rate (45 bpm), tidal volume (10 ml/kg), and inspiration: expiration ratio (I:E ratio, 1:2), (2) optimization of the trigger window for consistent trigger points, and (3) use of fit residual map and coefficient of variance as metrics to assess data quality. We compared image quality, perfusion maps, and fit residual maps between mechanically ventilated and non-ventilated animals, as well as repeated ASL measurements (session = 4 per animal) in two mechanically ventilated animals.

Results: Perfusion measurements over multiple sessions in mechanically ventilated rats exhibited low perfusion data variability and high reproducibility both within and between liver lobes. Image quality and perfusion maps were significantly improved in mechanically ventilated animals compared to non-ventilated animals.

Discussion: The implementation of mechanical ventilation and optimized quality assurance protocols enhanced the reliability and reproducibility of FAIR-based multi-TI-ASL imaging in rat livers. Our findings demonstrate these measures as a robust approach for achieving consistent liver perfusion quantification in preclinical settings.

可靠和可重复的大鼠肝脏多ti动脉自旋标记灌注成像的质量保证方案。
目的:建立大鼠肝脏动脉自旋标记(ASL)方案,提高灌注定量数据的可靠性和可重复性。方法:本研究采用呼吸门控、单层、基于fair的大鼠肝脏ASL多次反转成像(TI)。质量保证措施包括:(1)引入机械通气,通过控制呼吸频率(45 bpm)、潮气量(10 ml/kg)和吸气呼气比(I:E比,1:2)来确保一致的呼吸周期;(2)优化触发窗口以获得一致的触发点;(3)使用拟合残差图和方差系数作为评估数据质量的指标。我们比较了机械通气和非机械通气动物的图像质量、灌注图和拟合残差图,并在两个机械通气动物中重复ASL测量(每只动物4次)。结果:机械通气大鼠多次灌注测量显示,肝叶内和肝叶之间的灌注数据变异性低,重复性高。与非通气动物相比,机械通气动物的图像质量和灌注图显著改善。讨论:机械通气的实施和优化的质量保证方案增强了基于fair的大鼠肝脏多重ti- asl成像的可靠性和可重复性。我们的研究结果表明,这些措施是在临床前实现一致的肝灌注量化的可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include: advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology, new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine, study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance, reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信