Preoperative prediction of the selection of the NOTES approach for patients with symptomatic simple renal cysts via an interpretable machine learning model: a retrospective study of 264 patients.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yuanbin Huang, Xinmiao Ma, Wei Wang, Chen Shen, Fei Liu, Zhiqi Chen, Aoyu Yang, Xiancheng Li
{"title":"Preoperative prediction of the selection of the NOTES approach for patients with symptomatic simple renal cysts via an interpretable machine learning model: a retrospective study of 264 patients.","authors":"Yuanbin Huang, Xinmiao Ma, Wei Wang, Chen Shen, Fei Liu, Zhiqi Chen, Aoyu Yang, Xiancheng Li","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03586-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are multiple surgical approaches for treating symptomatic simple renal cysts (SSRCs). The natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach has gradually been applied as an emerging minimally invasive approach for the treatment of SSRCs. However, there are no clear indicators for selecting the NOTES approach for patients with SSRCs. We aimed to investigate the preoperative clinical determinants that influence the selection of the NOTES approach in patients with SSRCs and to construct a prediction model to assist the surgeons in selecting the NOTES approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from 264 patients with SSRCs from a single-center medical institution were included. Predictors were analyzed via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable logistic regression. Various machine learning classification algorithms were evaluated to determine the optimal model. An interpretive framework for personalized risk assessment was developed via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative factors predicting the selection of the NOTES approach included cyst growth, the presence of renal calculus, body mass index, history of diabetes, history of cerebrovascular disease, hemoglobin level, and the platelet (PLT) count. The logistic classification model was identified as the optimal model, with area under the curve of 0.962, an accuracy of 0.868, a sensitivity of 0.889, and a specificity of 1.000 in the test set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A logistic regression model was constructed and tested via the SHAP method, providing a scientific basis for selecting the NOTES approach for patients with SSRCs. This method offers effective decision support for doctors in choosing the NOTES approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03586-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are multiple surgical approaches for treating symptomatic simple renal cysts (SSRCs). The natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach has gradually been applied as an emerging minimally invasive approach for the treatment of SSRCs. However, there are no clear indicators for selecting the NOTES approach for patients with SSRCs. We aimed to investigate the preoperative clinical determinants that influence the selection of the NOTES approach in patients with SSRCs and to construct a prediction model to assist the surgeons in selecting the NOTES approach.

Methods: Clinical data from 264 patients with SSRCs from a single-center medical institution were included. Predictors were analyzed via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable logistic regression. Various machine learning classification algorithms were evaluated to determine the optimal model. An interpretive framework for personalized risk assessment was developed via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

Results: Preoperative factors predicting the selection of the NOTES approach included cyst growth, the presence of renal calculus, body mass index, history of diabetes, history of cerebrovascular disease, hemoglobin level, and the platelet (PLT) count. The logistic classification model was identified as the optimal model, with area under the curve of 0.962, an accuracy of 0.868, a sensitivity of 0.889, and a specificity of 1.000 in the test set.

Conclusion: A logistic regression model was constructed and tested via the SHAP method, providing a scientific basis for selecting the NOTES approach for patients with SSRCs. This method offers effective decision support for doctors in choosing the NOTES approach.

通过可解释的机器学习模型预测症状单纯性肾囊肿患者NOTES入路的术前选择:264例患者的回顾性研究。
背景:治疗症状性单纯性肾囊肿(ssrc)有多种手术方法。自然孔腔内窥镜手术(NOTES)入路已逐渐作为一种新兴的微创入路应用于治疗ssrc。然而,对于ssrc患者选择NOTES方法尚无明确的指标。我们的目的是研究影响ssrc患者选择NOTES入路的术前临床决定因素,并构建预测模型以帮助外科医生选择NOTES入路。方法:纳入某单中心医疗机构264例ssrc患者的临床资料。通过最小绝对收缩、选择算子和多变量逻辑回归分析预测因子。评估了各种机器学习分类算法,以确定最优模型。通过SHapley加性解释(SHAP)开发了个性化风险评估的解释框架。结果:术前预测选择NOTES入路的因素包括囊肿生长、肾结石的存在、体重指数、糖尿病史、脑血管病史、血红蛋白水平和血小板(PLT)计数。logistic分类模型为最优模型,其曲线下面积为0.962,准确率为0.868,灵敏度为0.889,特异性为1.000。结论:通过SHAP方法构建了logistic回归模型并进行了检验,为ssrc患者选择NOTES方法提供了科学依据。该方法为医生选择NOTES方法提供了有效的决策支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信