Education Research: Utilization of Simulation in Residency Programs: A Survey of Adult Neurology Residency Program Directors.

Neurology. Education Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1212/NE9.0000000000200156
Shivani Ghoshal, Catherine S W Albin, Nisha A Malhotra, Ifeyinwa Asonye, John Budrow, Rebecca Stainman, Arielle Kurzweil, Michelle Bell, Jenna Ford, Inna Kleyman, Nina Massad, Yara Mikhaeil-Demo, Briana Wasserstrom, Zahari Tchopev, Nicholas A Morris
{"title":"Education Research: Utilization of Simulation in Residency Programs: A Survey of Adult Neurology Residency Program Directors.","authors":"Shivani Ghoshal, Catherine S W Albin, Nisha A Malhotra, Ifeyinwa Asonye, John Budrow, Rebecca Stainman, Arielle Kurzweil, Michelle Bell, Jenna Ford, Inna Kleyman, Nina Massad, Yara Mikhaeil-Demo, Briana Wasserstrom, Zahari Tchopev, Nicholas A Morris","doi":"10.1212/NE9.0000000000200156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Previous research has demonstrated that simulation-based medical education (SBME) can improve neurology trainees' confidence, knowledge, and competence. However, a general needs assessment and review of current SBME used within neurology are needed to guide SBME curriculum development. The objective of this study was to describe the current use of SBME in resident education and to assess perceived barriers to expanding SBME interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed adult neurology residency program directors (PDs) listed in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education directory using a Qualtrics-based survey platform. Survey questions addressed current utilization of SBME and barriers to SBME growth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five PDs of 171 contactable PDs responded to our survey (response rate 44%). Of the respondents, 84% (64/75) report using SBME in their adult neurology residencies. Of those using SBME, 87% (55/64) programs create their own cases. Most programs use simulation to teach neurocritical care topics (63%) and vascular neurology (78%); few use simulation to teach outpatient topics and teleneurology. Among programs that use SBME, there was variability in the frequency of the SBME interventions and in the target trainee cohort. Among responding programs, most expressed interest in expanding SBME in their curriculum (69%, 52/64), but frequently cited lack of faculty protected time (55%), funding (35%), and resident availability (32%) as barriers to doing so.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Most responding programs use SBME. However, the frequency and target learner for SBME interventions varied between programs. Many programs wish to expand SBME at their institutions but are constrained by limited protected time and institutional financial support. We discuss potential solutions to the perceived barriers to SBME, including intra-institutional collaboration to advance SBME use and case diversity for learners and help innovate neurology medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":520085,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Education","volume":"3 4","pages":"e200156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NE9.0000000000200156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Previous research has demonstrated that simulation-based medical education (SBME) can improve neurology trainees' confidence, knowledge, and competence. However, a general needs assessment and review of current SBME used within neurology are needed to guide SBME curriculum development. The objective of this study was to describe the current use of SBME in resident education and to assess perceived barriers to expanding SBME interventions.

Methods: We surveyed adult neurology residency program directors (PDs) listed in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education directory using a Qualtrics-based survey platform. Survey questions addressed current utilization of SBME and barriers to SBME growth.

Results: Seventy-five PDs of 171 contactable PDs responded to our survey (response rate 44%). Of the respondents, 84% (64/75) report using SBME in their adult neurology residencies. Of those using SBME, 87% (55/64) programs create their own cases. Most programs use simulation to teach neurocritical care topics (63%) and vascular neurology (78%); few use simulation to teach outpatient topics and teleneurology. Among programs that use SBME, there was variability in the frequency of the SBME interventions and in the target trainee cohort. Among responding programs, most expressed interest in expanding SBME in their curriculum (69%, 52/64), but frequently cited lack of faculty protected time (55%), funding (35%), and resident availability (32%) as barriers to doing so.

Discussion: Most responding programs use SBME. However, the frequency and target learner for SBME interventions varied between programs. Many programs wish to expand SBME at their institutions but are constrained by limited protected time and institutional financial support. We discuss potential solutions to the perceived barriers to SBME, including intra-institutional collaboration to advance SBME use and case diversity for learners and help innovate neurology medical education.

教育研究:模拟在住院医师计划中的应用:对成人神经病学住院医师计划主任的调查。
背景与目的:以往的研究表明,基于模拟的医学教育(SBME)可以提高神经学学员的信心、知识和能力。然而,需要对神经学中目前使用的SBME进行一般需求评估和审查,以指导SBME课程的开发。本研究的目的是描述当前中小企业在居民教育中的使用情况,并评估扩大中小企业干预措施的感知障碍。方法:我们使用基于质量的调查平台对研究生医学教育认证委员会目录中列出的成人神经病学住院医师项目主任(pd)进行了调查。调查问题涉及中小企业目前的利用情况和阻碍中小企业发展的障碍。结果:171名可接触的pd中有75名pd回应了我们的调查(回复率为44%)。在受访者中,84%(64/75)报告在其成人神经病学住院医师中使用SBME。在使用SBME的程序中,87%(55/64)的程序创建了自己的案例。大多数程序使用模拟来教授神经危重症护理主题(63%)和血管神经学(78%);很少使用模拟来教授门诊话题和远程神经病学。在使用SBME的项目中,在SBME干预的频率和目标受训人员队列中存在差异。在回应的项目中,大多数项目表示有兴趣在其课程中扩展中小企业(69%,52/64),但经常提到缺乏教师保护时间(55%),资金(35%)和居民可用性(32%)是这样做的障碍。讨论:大多数响应程序使用SBME。然而,中小企业企业干预的频率和目标学习者因项目而异。许多项目希望在他们的机构中扩大中小企业,但受到有限的保护时间和机构财政支持的限制。我们讨论了解决SBME障碍的潜在解决方案,包括机构内合作,以促进学习者使用SBME和案例多样性,并帮助创新神经病学医学教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信