Diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia: blood plasma and optical coherence tomography.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain communications Pub Date : 2024-12-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcae472
Vidishaa Jali, Qinglin Zhang, Joyce Ruifen Chong, Damon Wong, Bingyao Tan, Gerhard Garhöfer, Saima Hilal, Mitchell K P Lai, Leopold Schmetterer, Christopher Li-Hsian Chen, Jacqueline Chua
{"title":"Diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia: blood plasma and optical coherence tomography.","authors":"Vidishaa Jali, Qinglin Zhang, Joyce Ruifen Chong, Damon Wong, Bingyao Tan, Gerhard Garhöfer, Saima Hilal, Mitchell K P Lai, Leopold Schmetterer, Christopher Li-Hsian Chen, Jacqueline Chua","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate and early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia is crucial for enabling timely interventions and improving patient outcomes. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of plasma biomarkers (neurofilament light chain and phosphorylated tau181) and retinal biomarkers (retinal nerve fibre layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer), individually and in combination, in differentiating moderate cognitive impairment and dementia from mild cognitive impairment and no cognitive impairment. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 509 participants, aged 50 and older, recruited from a memory clinic. The participants were categorized as normal (<i>n</i> = 100), mild cognitive impairment (<i>n</i> = 144), moderate cognitive impairment (<i>n</i> = 90) or dementia (<i>n</i> = 175) based on detailed clinical assessments, neuropsychological testing and MRI scans. The thickness of the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and retinal nerve fibre layer (<i>P</i> = 0.030) decreased progressively from normal cognition to cognitive impairment and dementia. The thickest layers were observed in individuals with no cognitive impairment (mean ± standard deviation: ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer: 76 ± 11 µm, retinal nerve fibre layer: 92 ± 10 µm), while the thinnest layers were found in individuals with dementia (ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer: 72 ± 14 µm, retinal nerve fibre layer: 89 ± 12 µm). Plasma biomarker levels increased progressively from normal cognition to cognitive impairment and dementia (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Levels were lowest in individuals with no cognitive impairment [median (interquartile range): neurofilament light chain: 15 (9) pg/mL, phosphorylated tau181: 1.85 (1.00) pg/mL] and highest in those with dementia [neurofilament light chain: 34 (27) pg/mL, phosphorylated tau181: 3.24 (2.81) pg/mL]. After adjusting for retinal scan signal strength, neurofilament light chain showed a stronger negative association with retinal nerve fibre layer thickness [standardized beta estimate (<i>β</i>) = -0.184] and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (<i>β</i> = -0.139) compared to phosphorylated tau181, which exhibited weaker associations with ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (<i>β</i> = -0.091) and retinal nerve fibre layer (<i>β</i> = -0.059). While retinal parameters provided modest discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.60), plasma biomarkers demonstrated superior diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.76). Notably, neurofilament light chain had a stronger association with retinal thinning than phosphorylated tau181 and offered superior diagnostic value for identifying moderate cognitive decline. These findings underscore the potential of plasma biomarkers, particularly neurofilament light chain, for the early detection of dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 1","pages":"fcae472"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate and early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia is crucial for enabling timely interventions and improving patient outcomes. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of plasma biomarkers (neurofilament light chain and phosphorylated tau181) and retinal biomarkers (retinal nerve fibre layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer), individually and in combination, in differentiating moderate cognitive impairment and dementia from mild cognitive impairment and no cognitive impairment. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 509 participants, aged 50 and older, recruited from a memory clinic. The participants were categorized as normal (n = 100), mild cognitive impairment (n = 144), moderate cognitive impairment (n = 90) or dementia (n = 175) based on detailed clinical assessments, neuropsychological testing and MRI scans. The thickness of the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (P < 0.001) and retinal nerve fibre layer (P = 0.030) decreased progressively from normal cognition to cognitive impairment and dementia. The thickest layers were observed in individuals with no cognitive impairment (mean ± standard deviation: ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer: 76 ± 11 µm, retinal nerve fibre layer: 92 ± 10 µm), while the thinnest layers were found in individuals with dementia (ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer: 72 ± 14 µm, retinal nerve fibre layer: 89 ± 12 µm). Plasma biomarker levels increased progressively from normal cognition to cognitive impairment and dementia (P < 0.001). Levels were lowest in individuals with no cognitive impairment [median (interquartile range): neurofilament light chain: 15 (9) pg/mL, phosphorylated tau181: 1.85 (1.00) pg/mL] and highest in those with dementia [neurofilament light chain: 34 (27) pg/mL, phosphorylated tau181: 3.24 (2.81) pg/mL]. After adjusting for retinal scan signal strength, neurofilament light chain showed a stronger negative association with retinal nerve fibre layer thickness [standardized beta estimate (β) = -0.184] and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (β = -0.139) compared to phosphorylated tau181, which exhibited weaker associations with ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (β = -0.091) and retinal nerve fibre layer (β = -0.059). While retinal parameters provided modest discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.60), plasma biomarkers demonstrated superior diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.76). Notably, neurofilament light chain had a stronger association with retinal thinning than phosphorylated tau181 and offered superior diagnostic value for identifying moderate cognitive decline. These findings underscore the potential of plasma biomarkers, particularly neurofilament light chain, for the early detection of dementia.

认知障碍和痴呆的诊断:血浆和光学相干断层扫描。
准确和早期诊断阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆对于及时干预和改善患者预后至关重要。本研究评估血浆生物标志物(神经丝轻链和磷酸化tau181)和视网膜生物标志物(视网膜神经纤维层和神经节细胞-内丛状层)单独和联合用于区分中度认知障碍和痴呆与轻度认知障碍和无认知障碍的诊断性能。一项横断面研究从一家记忆诊所招募了509名年龄在50岁及以上的参与者。根据详细的临床评估、神经心理测试和MRI扫描,参与者被分为正常(n = 100)、轻度认知障碍(n = 144)、中度认知障碍(n = 90)或痴呆(n = 175)。神经节细胞-内丛状层厚度(P < 0.001)和视网膜神经纤维层厚度(P = 0.030)从认知正常到认知障碍和痴呆呈递减趋势。其中,无认知障碍者层数最厚(平均±标准差:神经节细胞-内丛状层:76±11µm,视网膜神经纤维层:92±10µm),痴呆者层数最薄(神经节细胞-内丛状层:72±14µm,视网膜神经纤维层:89±12µm)。血浆生物标志物水平从正常认知到认知障碍和痴呆逐渐升高(P < 0.001)。无认知障碍个体的水平最低[中位数(四分位数范围):神经丝轻链:15 (9)pg/mL,磷酸化tau181: 1.85 (1.00) pg/mL],痴呆患者的水平最高[神经丝轻链:34 (27)pg/mL,磷酸化tau181: 3.24 (2.81) pg/mL]。在调整视网膜扫描信号强度后,与磷酸化的tau181相比,神经丝轻链与视网膜神经纤维层厚度(标准化β估计(β) = -0.184)和神经节细胞-内丛状层厚度(β = -0.139)呈较强的负相关,与神经节细胞-内丛状层(β = -0.091)和视网膜神经纤维层(β = -0.059)的相关性较弱。虽然视网膜参数提供了适度的区分能力(AUC = 0.60),但血浆生物标志物表现出卓越的诊断性能(AUC = 0.76)。值得注意的是,与磷酸化的tau181相比,神经丝轻链与视网膜变薄的关联更强,并且在识别中度认知能力下降方面具有更好的诊断价值。这些发现强调了血浆生物标志物,特别是神经丝轻链在早期检测痴呆症方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信