Short-term effects of exergaming on patients with chronic low back pain: A single-blind randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103248
Ru-Lan Hsieh, Yann-Rong Chen, Wen-Chung Lee
{"title":"Short-term effects of exergaming on patients with chronic low back pain: A single-blind randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ru-Lan Hsieh, Yann-Rong Chen, Wen-Chung Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exergaming is increasingly popular, but its impact on chronic low back pain (CLBP) remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of exergaming versus traditional exercise for managing CLBP using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-blind, randomized controlled trial included 70 participants with CLBP, who were assigned to either the exergaming or traditional exercise group. Both groups received 2 weeks of treatment with six sessions. Assessments included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), range of motion, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), balance (Biodex Stability System), Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), and physical performance tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After six sessions over 2 weeks, the exergaming group showed significant improvements over the exercise group in ODI (p < 0.001), chair-rising time (p = 0.001), stair ascent (p = 0.025) and descent times (p < 0.001), flexion (p = 0.005), extension (p = 0.001), balance (p = 0.012), and FABQ subscales (physical activity: p = 0.003; work: p < 0.001) at the 3-month follow-up. Group × time interaction effects favored exergaming for ODI (p = 0.012), chair-rising (p = 0.045), stair ascent (p = 0.010), and descent (p = 0.002) times. While these changes did not meet clinical significance, exergaming was not inferior to traditional exercise in improving spinal motion, physical performance, fear-avoidance beliefs, and disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exergaming appears to be a viable supplementary therapy for patients with CLBP, offering benefits across all ICF domains. Future studies with longer intervention durations are needed to assess its long-term effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"75 ","pages":"103248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exergaming is increasingly popular, but its impact on chronic low back pain (CLBP) remain unclear.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of exergaming versus traditional exercise for managing CLBP using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework.

Methods: This single-blind, randomized controlled trial included 70 participants with CLBP, who were assigned to either the exergaming or traditional exercise group. Both groups received 2 weeks of treatment with six sessions. Assessments included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), range of motion, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), balance (Biodex Stability System), Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), and physical performance tests.

Results: After six sessions over 2 weeks, the exergaming group showed significant improvements over the exercise group in ODI (p < 0.001), chair-rising time (p = 0.001), stair ascent (p = 0.025) and descent times (p < 0.001), flexion (p = 0.005), extension (p = 0.001), balance (p = 0.012), and FABQ subscales (physical activity: p = 0.003; work: p < 0.001) at the 3-month follow-up. Group × time interaction effects favored exergaming for ODI (p = 0.012), chair-rising (p = 0.045), stair ascent (p = 0.010), and descent (p = 0.002) times. While these changes did not meet clinical significance, exergaming was not inferior to traditional exercise in improving spinal motion, physical performance, fear-avoidance beliefs, and disability.

Conclusion: Exergaming appears to be a viable supplementary therapy for patients with CLBP, offering benefits across all ICF domains. Future studies with longer intervention durations are needed to assess its long-term effects.

运动对慢性腰痛患者的短期影响:一项单盲随机对照试验。
背景:运动越来越受欢迎,但其对慢性腰痛(CLBP)的影响尚不清楚。目的:利用国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)框架,评估运动与传统运动在治疗CLBP方面的有效性。方法:这项单盲、随机对照试验包括70名CLBP患者,他们被分为运动组和传统运动组。两组均接受为期2周的6次治疗。评估包括Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、活动范围、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)、平衡(Biodex稳定性系统)、恐惧-回避信念问卷(FABQ)和体能测试。结果:在2周的6次疗程后,运动组在ODI方面比运动组有显著改善(p)。结论:运动似乎是CLBP患者的一种可行的补充疗法,在所有ICF领域都有益处。未来的研究需要更长的干预时间来评估其长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信