Reconstruction of the Superior Capsule Using Peroneus Longus Tendon Graft Combined With Transposition of Biceps Tendon for Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1177/03635465241303153
Yi Zhou, Ling Chen, Fan Bai, Xiaolong Yang, Weili Fu
{"title":"Reconstruction of the Superior Capsule Using Peroneus Longus Tendon Graft Combined With Transposition of Biceps Tendon for Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.","authors":"Yi Zhou, Ling Chen, Fan Bai, Xiaolong Yang, Weili Fu","doi":"10.1177/03635465241303153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with biceps tendon transposition (TB) alone for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (IMRCTs) has demonstrated a high retear rate, highlighting the need for alternative approaches. Therefore, SCR using a peroneus longus tendon graft (PLG) combined with TB (PLG-TB) should be clinically studied.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of SCR using the PLG-TB technique versus the TB technique alone for IMRCT.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February 2017 and March 2022, 94 patients were diagnosed with IMRCT; 45 patients underwent SCR using the TB technique (group 1), and 49 patients underwent SCR using the PLG-TB technique (group 2). The choice of technique was based on tendon damage severity and patient preference. After a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, postoperative clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); Constant; and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores as well as the shoulder range of motion. The integrity of tendons, acromiohumeral distance, and retear was evaluated through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up times were 35.2 ± 4.2 months for group 1 and 34.1 ± 3.2 months for group 2. There was a significant improvement observed in all clinical outcomes in both groups from the baseline preoperative evaluations to the final follow-up assessments (<i>P</i> = .001 for ASES score, UCLA score, Constant score, VAS score, forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation). Shoulder abduction in group 2 showed statistically significant mean improvements at the postoperative 3-month, 6-month, and final follow-ups compared with group 1 (3 months: 105.17°± 7.13° vs 89.34°± 7.34° [<i>P</i> = .001]; 6 months: 138.14°± 9.12° vs 107.35°± 8.54° [<i>P</i> = .001]; final follow-up: 157.35°± 8.11° vs 135.31°± 7.01° [<i>P</i> = .001]). The tendon integrity at the final follow-up (Sugaya MRI grades 1/2/3/4/5) was significantly better in group 2 (30/6/6/4/3) compared with group 1 (11/13/5/6/10) (<i>P</i> = .014). Additionally, the tendon retear rate was lower in group 2 (7/49; 14.29%) than in group 1 (16/45, 35.56%) (<i>P</i> = .015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both surgical techniques led to acceptable clinical outcomes in patients with IMRCT. However, using the PLG-TB technique for SCR was associated with lower retear rates and enhanced abduction function outcomes compared with the TB technique for SCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"437-446"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241303153","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with biceps tendon transposition (TB) alone for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (IMRCTs) has demonstrated a high retear rate, highlighting the need for alternative approaches. Therefore, SCR using a peroneus longus tendon graft (PLG) combined with TB (PLG-TB) should be clinically studied.

Purpose: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of SCR using the PLG-TB technique versus the TB technique alone for IMRCT.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Between February 2017 and March 2022, 94 patients were diagnosed with IMRCT; 45 patients underwent SCR using the TB technique (group 1), and 49 patients underwent SCR using the PLG-TB technique (group 2). The choice of technique was based on tendon damage severity and patient preference. After a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, postoperative clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); Constant; and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores as well as the shoulder range of motion. The integrity of tendons, acromiohumeral distance, and retear was evaluated through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Results: The mean follow-up times were 35.2 ± 4.2 months for group 1 and 34.1 ± 3.2 months for group 2. There was a significant improvement observed in all clinical outcomes in both groups from the baseline preoperative evaluations to the final follow-up assessments (P = .001 for ASES score, UCLA score, Constant score, VAS score, forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation). Shoulder abduction in group 2 showed statistically significant mean improvements at the postoperative 3-month, 6-month, and final follow-ups compared with group 1 (3 months: 105.17°± 7.13° vs 89.34°± 7.34° [P = .001]; 6 months: 138.14°± 9.12° vs 107.35°± 8.54° [P = .001]; final follow-up: 157.35°± 8.11° vs 135.31°± 7.01° [P = .001]). The tendon integrity at the final follow-up (Sugaya MRI grades 1/2/3/4/5) was significantly better in group 2 (30/6/6/4/3) compared with group 1 (11/13/5/6/10) (P = .014). Additionally, the tendon retear rate was lower in group 2 (7/49; 14.29%) than in group 1 (16/45, 35.56%) (P = .015).

Conclusion: Both surgical techniques led to acceptable clinical outcomes in patients with IMRCT. However, using the PLG-TB technique for SCR was associated with lower retear rates and enhanced abduction function outcomes compared with the TB technique for SCR.

腓骨长肌腱联合二头肌肌腱转位重建上囊治疗不可修复的大面积肩袖撕裂。
背景:传统的上囊重建术(SCR)联合二头肌腱转位(TB)治疗不可修复的大面积肩袖撕裂(imrct)具有很高的复发率,这表明需要其他方法。因此,应用腓骨长肌腱移植(PLG)联合结核(PLG-TB)进行SCR的临床研究是必要的。目的:比较使用PLG-TB技术与单独使用TB技术进行IMRCT的SCR的临床和放射学结果。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:2017年2月至2022年3月,94例诊断为IMRCT的患者;45例患者使用TB技术进行SCR(第一组),49例患者使用PLG-TB技术进行SCR(第二组)。技术的选择基于肌腱损伤的严重程度和患者的偏好。在至少2年的随访期后,使用美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)比较术后临床结果;加州大学洛杉矶分校;常数;视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于疼痛评分和肩部活动范围。通过磁共振成像(MRI)评估肌腱的完整性、肩肱距离和撕裂。结果:1组患者平均随访35.2±4.2个月,2组患者平均随访34.1±3.2个月。从基线术前评估到最终随访评估,两组患者的所有临床结果均有显著改善(as评分、UCLA评分、Constant评分、VAS评分、前屈、外展和外旋的P = 0.001)。与第1组相比,第2组肩关节外展在术后3个月、6个月和最后随访时的平均改善具有统计学意义(3个月:105.17°±7.13°vs 89.34°±7.34°)[P = .001];6个月:138.14°±9.12°vs 107.35°±8.54°[P = .001];最终随访:157.35°±8.11°vs 135.31°±7.01°[P = .001])。最终随访时,2组(30/6/6/4/3)的肌腱完整性(Sugaya MRI评分为1/2/3/4/5)明显优于1组(11/13/5/6/10)(P = 0.014)。此外,2组肌腱再撕裂率较低(7/49;14.29%)高于1组(16/45,35.56%)(P = 0.015)。结论:两种手术技术均可为IMRCT患者带来可接受的临床结果。然而,与TB技术相比,使用PLG-TB技术治疗SCR与较低的回收率和增强的外展功能结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信