Combination Inhaled Corticosteroid and Short-acting Beta2 Agonist (ICS-SABA) Use for Older Adults With Asthma.

Q2 Medicine
Jaycie Truong, Kimberly A B Cauthon
{"title":"Combination Inhaled Corticosteroid and Short-acting Beta2 Agonist (ICS-SABA) Use for Older Adults With Asthma.","authors":"Jaycie Truong, Kimberly A B Cauthon","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2025.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The first combination inhaled corticosteroid and short-acting beta₂ agonist (ICS-SABA) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2023 for as-needed treatment or prevention of bronchoconstriction and to reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations in patients 18 years of age and older. The recently approved product contains an ICS-albuterol combination. The 2024 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines recommend as-needed ICS-formoterol as the preferred asthma reliever therapy; however, a GINA alternative recommendation is the use of ICS whenever an as-needed (SABA) is used. There is no difference in as-needed asthma treatment recommended by the GINA guidelines in older adults, and there has been minimal study in older adults. Because of limited guidance on the use of the ICS-SABA reliever inhaler in older adults, the purpose of this review is to evaluate the DENALI and MANDALA studies and the potential role of ICS-SABA in older adults. The mean ages in both studies were 50 years. The MANDALA primary outcome result was a statistically significant lower risk of severe exacerbations in the ICS-SABA reliever group compared with the as-needed albuterol (ALB) group at 24 weeks. In the MANDALA older adults subgroup analysis, there was not a statistically significant difference in the ICS-SABA reliever group compared with the as-needed ALB-alone group but the results favored ICS-SABA. The DENALI primary outcome results were a greater change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) area under the curve averaged over 12 weeks with albuterol/budesonide (ALB-BUD) 180/160 ug compared with budesonide alone and placebo and a greater change from baseline in trough FEV1 with ALB-BUD 180/160 ug and 180/80 ug than ALB-alone and placebo. Because of minimal adverse effects in both trials and the benefits in preventing asthma exacerbations reported in the MANDALA trial, it is important to assess and recommend that older adults with asthma receive inhaled corticosteroid with their reliever asthma inhaler.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"40 1","pages":"3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2025.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The first combination inhaled corticosteroid and short-acting beta₂ agonist (ICS-SABA) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2023 for as-needed treatment or prevention of bronchoconstriction and to reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations in patients 18 years of age and older. The recently approved product contains an ICS-albuterol combination. The 2024 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines recommend as-needed ICS-formoterol as the preferred asthma reliever therapy; however, a GINA alternative recommendation is the use of ICS whenever an as-needed (SABA) is used. There is no difference in as-needed asthma treatment recommended by the GINA guidelines in older adults, and there has been minimal study in older adults. Because of limited guidance on the use of the ICS-SABA reliever inhaler in older adults, the purpose of this review is to evaluate the DENALI and MANDALA studies and the potential role of ICS-SABA in older adults. The mean ages in both studies were 50 years. The MANDALA primary outcome result was a statistically significant lower risk of severe exacerbations in the ICS-SABA reliever group compared with the as-needed albuterol (ALB) group at 24 weeks. In the MANDALA older adults subgroup analysis, there was not a statistically significant difference in the ICS-SABA reliever group compared with the as-needed ALB-alone group but the results favored ICS-SABA. The DENALI primary outcome results were a greater change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) area under the curve averaged over 12 weeks with albuterol/budesonide (ALB-BUD) 180/160 ug compared with budesonide alone and placebo and a greater change from baseline in trough FEV1 with ALB-BUD 180/160 ug and 180/80 ug than ALB-alone and placebo. Because of minimal adverse effects in both trials and the benefits in preventing asthma exacerbations reported in the MANDALA trial, it is important to assess and recommend that older adults with asthma receive inhaled corticosteroid with their reliever asthma inhaler.

吸入皮质类固醇和短效β 2激动剂(ICS-SABA)联合用于老年哮喘患者。
2023年,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准了首个吸入皮质类固醇和短效β 2激动剂(ICS-SABA)联合用药,用于治疗或预防支气管收缩,并降低18岁及以上患者哮喘发作的风险。最近批准的产品含有一种ics -沙丁胺醇混合物。2024年全球哮喘倡议(GINA)指南推荐按需使用ics -福莫特罗作为首选哮喘缓解药物;然而,GINA的另一项建议是,只要使用了按需(SABA),就使用ICS。GINA指南在老年人中推荐的按需哮喘治疗没有差异,而且对老年人的研究很少。由于在老年人中使用ICS-SABA缓解吸入器的指导有限,本综述的目的是评估DENALI和MANDALA研究以及ICS-SABA在老年人中的潜在作用。两项研究的平均年龄都是50岁。MANDALA的主要结果是,与按需沙丁胺醇(ALB)组相比,ICS-SABA缓解组在24周时严重恶化的风险具有统计学意义。在MANDALA老年人亚组分析中,ICS-SABA缓解组与按需单独使用alb组相比没有统计学上的显著差异,但结果更倾向于ICS-SABA。DENALI的主要结局是沙丁胺醇/布地奈德(ALB-BUD) 180/160 ug与布地奈德单独和安慰剂相比,12周内平均曲线下第一秒强迫呼气量(FEV1)较基线变化更大,ALB-BUD 180/160 ug和180/80 ug与alb单独和安慰剂相比,FEV1较基线变化更大。由于两项试验的不良反应都很小,而MANDALA试验报告的预防哮喘加重的益处也很小,因此评估和推荐老年哮喘患者吸入皮质类固醇与缓解哮喘吸入器一起使用是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信