Research Paradigm of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) With Item Response Theory: Clarification, Classification, and Challenge.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Chun Feng, Shou-Guo Liu, Liang Zhou, Feng Lin
{"title":"Research Paradigm of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) With Item Response Theory: Clarification, Classification, and Challenge.","authors":"Chun Feng, Shou-Guo Liu, Liang Zhou, Feng Lin","doi":"10.1002/pri.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is the worldwide terminology system for measuring health and disability at both individual and population levels. However, the underlying challenges remain in achieving widespread adoption and implementation of ICF within healthcare contexts, including the unequal interval scale of the ICF Likert-type qualifier system ranging from 0 to 4, a lack of consensus on conceptualization and grading criteria of ICF items, and an excessive number of ICF items associated with each disease. The utilization of item response theory (IRT) for ICF studies demonstrated potential benefits in addressing these issues. Here, a review attempted to provide clarification of two predominant needs (sufficiency and efficiency) and two dimensions of scoring principles (stratification and assignment principles) in the ICF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted on the PubMed database, and 44 relative articles were selected. On this basis, this review was undertaken to track the research progress of the ICF based on the parameter IRT method, typically the Rasch model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review outlined the classification of Item response model (IRM) for ICF studies and summarized existing IRT-based ICF research paradigms. Moreover, this review identified blind spots regarding assignment principles and the difficulty parameter in current ICF-based IRT studies. The Mokken scale analysis (MSA), as a non-parametric IRT method, was introduced as a data shaping tool for parametric IRM. The pipeline of the ICF-based MSA-Rasch modeling might advance the understanding of ICF clinical application and shed light on a new paradigm of questionnaire design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The advent of ICF-oriented IRM algorithms may advance the comprehension of ICF clinical application and pave the way for a new paradigm for IRT-derived ICF questionnaires, namely the parsimonious ICF core set. Additionally, the Wright map holds promise in facilitating insight into rehabilitation trajectories and personalizing rehabilitation goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 1","pages":"e70021"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is the worldwide terminology system for measuring health and disability at both individual and population levels. However, the underlying challenges remain in achieving widespread adoption and implementation of ICF within healthcare contexts, including the unequal interval scale of the ICF Likert-type qualifier system ranging from 0 to 4, a lack of consensus on conceptualization and grading criteria of ICF items, and an excessive number of ICF items associated with each disease. The utilization of item response theory (IRT) for ICF studies demonstrated potential benefits in addressing these issues. Here, a review attempted to provide clarification of two predominant needs (sufficiency and efficiency) and two dimensions of scoring principles (stratification and assignment principles) in the ICF.

Methods: A literature search was conducted on the PubMed database, and 44 relative articles were selected. On this basis, this review was undertaken to track the research progress of the ICF based on the parameter IRT method, typically the Rasch model.

Results: This review outlined the classification of Item response model (IRM) for ICF studies and summarized existing IRT-based ICF research paradigms. Moreover, this review identified blind spots regarding assignment principles and the difficulty parameter in current ICF-based IRT studies. The Mokken scale analysis (MSA), as a non-parametric IRT method, was introduced as a data shaping tool for parametric IRM. The pipeline of the ICF-based MSA-Rasch modeling might advance the understanding of ICF clinical application and shed light on a new paradigm of questionnaire design.

Conclusion: The advent of ICF-oriented IRM algorithms may advance the comprehension of ICF clinical application and pave the way for a new paradigm for IRT-derived ICF questionnaires, namely the parsimonious ICF core set. Additionally, the Wright map holds promise in facilitating insight into rehabilitation trajectories and personalizing rehabilitation goals.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信