Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1002/phar.4642
Kelli Henry, Shiyuan Deng, Xianyan Chen, Tianyi Zhang, John Devlin, David Murphy, Susan Smith, Brian Murray, Rishikesan Kamaleswaran, Amoreena Most, Andrea Sikora
{"title":"Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction.","authors":"Kelli Henry, Shiyuan Deng, Xianyan Chen, Tianyi Zhang, John Devlin, David Murphy, Susan Smith, Brian Murray, Rishikesan Kamaleswaran, Amoreena Most, Andrea Sikora","doi":"10.1002/phar.4642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluid overload (FO) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is common, serious, and may be preventable. Intravenous medications (including administered volume) are a primary cause for FO but are challenging to evaluate as a FO predictor given the high frequency and time-dependency of their use and other factors affecting FO. We sought to employ unsupervised machine learning methods to uncover medication administration patterns correlating with FO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 927 adults admitted to an ICU for ≥72 h. FO was defined as a positive fluid balance ≥7% of admission body weight. After reviewing medication administration record data in 3-h periods, medication exposure was categorized into clusters using principal component analysis (PCA) and Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM). Medication regimens of patients with and without FO were compared within clusters to assess their temporal association with FO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FO occurred in 127 (13.7%) of 927 included patients. Patients received a median (interquartile range) of 31(13-65) discrete intravenous medication administrations over the 72-h period. Across all 47,803 intravenous medication administrations, 10 unique medication clusters, containing 121 to 130 medications per cluster, were identified. The mean number of Cluster 7 medications administered was significantly greater in the FO cohort compared with patients without FO (25.6 vs.10.9, p < 0.0001). A total of 51 (40.2%) of 127 unique Cluster 7 medications were administered in more than five different 3-h periods during the 72-h study window. The most common Cluster 7 medications included continuous infusions, antibiotics, and sedatives/analgesics. Addition of Cluster 7 medications to an FO prediction model including the Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and receipt of diuretics improved model predictiveness from an Area Under the Receiver Operation Characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.719 to 0.741 (p = 0.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using machine learning approaches, a unique medication cluster was strongly associated with FO. Incorporation of this cluster improved the ability to predict FO compared to traditional prediction models. Integration of this approach into real-time clinical applications may improve early detection of FO to facilitate timely intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.4642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fluid overload (FO) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is common, serious, and may be preventable. Intravenous medications (including administered volume) are a primary cause for FO but are challenging to evaluate as a FO predictor given the high frequency and time-dependency of their use and other factors affecting FO. We sought to employ unsupervised machine learning methods to uncover medication administration patterns correlating with FO.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 927 adults admitted to an ICU for ≥72 h. FO was defined as a positive fluid balance ≥7% of admission body weight. After reviewing medication administration record data in 3-h periods, medication exposure was categorized into clusters using principal component analysis (PCA) and Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM). Medication regimens of patients with and without FO were compared within clusters to assess their temporal association with FO.

Results: FO occurred in 127 (13.7%) of 927 included patients. Patients received a median (interquartile range) of 31(13-65) discrete intravenous medication administrations over the 72-h period. Across all 47,803 intravenous medication administrations, 10 unique medication clusters, containing 121 to 130 medications per cluster, were identified. The mean number of Cluster 7 medications administered was significantly greater in the FO cohort compared with patients without FO (25.6 vs.10.9, p < 0.0001). A total of 51 (40.2%) of 127 unique Cluster 7 medications were administered in more than five different 3-h periods during the 72-h study window. The most common Cluster 7 medications included continuous infusions, antibiotics, and sedatives/analgesics. Addition of Cluster 7 medications to an FO prediction model including the Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and receipt of diuretics improved model predictiveness from an Area Under the Receiver Operation Characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.719 to 0.741 (p = 0.027).

Conclusions: Using machine learning approaches, a unique medication cluster was strongly associated with FO. Incorporation of this cluster improved the ability to predict FO compared to traditional prediction models. Integration of this approach into real-time clinical applications may improve early detection of FO to facilitate timely intervention.

无监督机器学习分析,以确定ICU药物使用模式,用于流体过载预测。
背景:重症监护病房(ICU)的液体过载(FO)是一种常见、严重且可以预防的疾病。静脉注射药物(包括给药量)是FO的主要原因,但考虑到其使用的高频率和时间依赖性以及影响FO的其他因素,评估其作为FO预测指标具有挑战性。我们试图采用无监督机器学习方法来揭示与FO相关的药物管理模式。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入927名在ICU住院≥72小时的成年人。FO被定义为体液正平衡≥入院体重的7%。在回顾3小时的给药记录数据后,使用主成分分析(PCA)和限制性玻尔兹曼机(RBM)将药物暴露分类为簇。在组内比较有和没有FO的患者的药物治疗方案,以评估他们与FO的时间相关性。结果:927例患者中127例(13.7%)发生FO。患者在72小时内接受了31次(13-65次)离散静脉药物治疗。在所有47803次静脉给药中,确定了10个独特的药物簇,每簇包含121至130种药物。与没有FO的患者相比,FO队列中第7类药物的平均使用数量显著增加(25.6 vs.10.9, p)。结论:使用机器学习方法,一个独特的药物簇与FO密切相关。与传统的预测模型相比,该聚类的加入提高了预测FO的能力。将这种方法整合到实时临床应用中可以提高FO的早期发现,从而促进及时干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信