Fezolinetant and Elinzanetant Therapy for Menopausal Women Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005812
Artur Menegaz de Almeida, Paloma Oliveira, Lucca Lopes, Marianna Leite, Victória Morbach, Francinny Alves Kelly, Ítalo Barros, Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Alexandra Prevedello
{"title":"Fezolinetant and Elinzanetant Therapy for Menopausal Women Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Artur Menegaz de Almeida, Paloma Oliveira, Lucca Lopes, Marianna Leite, Victória Morbach, Francinny Alves Kelly, Ítalo Barros, Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Alexandra Prevedello","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant and elinzanetant for vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until August 22, 2024. Because the Cochrane Library included all the identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it was unnecessary to search ClinicalTrials.gov . The following words made up the search strategy, which was applied to the three databases: fezolinetant, elinzanetant, vasomotor symptoms, and menopause.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Only RCTs comparing fezolinetant and elinzanetant with placebo for vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women were included.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>We extracted the number of patients, mean age, body mass index (BMI), and number of patients who underwent oophorectomy. Data were examined with the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. R 4.3.2 was used for statistical analysis. Seven RCTs with 4,087 patients were included in the analysis. Fezolinetant and elinzanetant were associated with diminished vasomotor symptom frequency: fezolinetant 30 mg (mean difference 2.16, 95% CI, 1.54-2.79, I2 =0%), fezolinetant 45 mg (mean difference 2.54, 95% CI, 1.86-3.21, I2 =0%), and elinzanetant 120 mg (mean difference 2.99, 95% CI, 1.74-4.23, I2 =0%). Both drugs also showed a decrease in vasomotor symptom severity: fezolinetant 30 mg (mean difference 0.20, 95% CI, 0.09-0.33, I2 =0%), fezolinetant 45 mg (mean difference 0.24, 95% CI, 0.13-0.34, I2 =0%), and elinzanetant 120 mg (mean difference 0.36, 95% CI, 0.26-0.46, I2 =0%). Elinzanetant 120 mg showed a significant improvement in sleep quality (mean difference 4.65, 95% CI, 3.73-5.56, I2 =0%). Elinzanetant 120 mg was associated with the occurrence of drug-related adverse events (11.70% vs 20.75%, risk ratio [RR] 0.57, 95% CI, 0.39-0.82, I2 =19%) and headache (2.54% vs 8.0%, RR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.16-0.64, I2 =0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this meta-analysis, consistent results suggest that fezolinetant and elinzanetant are associated with beneficial outcomes in menopausal women with vasomotor symptoms. Elinzanetant provided a larger effect size in vasomotor symptom frequency and severity reduction and greatly improved sleep quality compared with fezolinetant.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO, CRD42023469952.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"253-261"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant and elinzanetant for vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until August 22, 2024. Because the Cochrane Library included all the identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it was unnecessary to search ClinicalTrials.gov . The following words made up the search strategy, which was applied to the three databases: fezolinetant, elinzanetant, vasomotor symptoms, and menopause.

Methods of study selection: Only RCTs comparing fezolinetant and elinzanetant with placebo for vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women were included.

Tabulation, integration, and results: We extracted the number of patients, mean age, body mass index (BMI), and number of patients who underwent oophorectomy. Data were examined with the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. R 4.3.2 was used for statistical analysis. Seven RCTs with 4,087 patients were included in the analysis. Fezolinetant and elinzanetant were associated with diminished vasomotor symptom frequency: fezolinetant 30 mg (mean difference 2.16, 95% CI, 1.54-2.79, I2 =0%), fezolinetant 45 mg (mean difference 2.54, 95% CI, 1.86-3.21, I2 =0%), and elinzanetant 120 mg (mean difference 2.99, 95% CI, 1.74-4.23, I2 =0%). Both drugs also showed a decrease in vasomotor symptom severity: fezolinetant 30 mg (mean difference 0.20, 95% CI, 0.09-0.33, I2 =0%), fezolinetant 45 mg (mean difference 0.24, 95% CI, 0.13-0.34, I2 =0%), and elinzanetant 120 mg (mean difference 0.36, 95% CI, 0.26-0.46, I2 =0%). Elinzanetant 120 mg showed a significant improvement in sleep quality (mean difference 4.65, 95% CI, 3.73-5.56, I2 =0%). Elinzanetant 120 mg was associated with the occurrence of drug-related adverse events (11.70% vs 20.75%, risk ratio [RR] 0.57, 95% CI, 0.39-0.82, I2 =19%) and headache (2.54% vs 8.0%, RR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.16-0.64, I2 =0%).

Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, consistent results suggest that fezolinetant and elinzanetant are associated with beneficial outcomes in menopausal women with vasomotor symptoms. Elinzanetant provided a larger effect size in vasomotor symptom frequency and severity reduction and greatly improved sleep quality compared with fezolinetant.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42023469952.

非唑啉奈坦和依兰那坦治疗出现血管舒缩症状的绝经期妇女:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:评价非唑啉尼坦和依兰那坦治疗绝经期妇女血管舒缩症状的疗效和安全性。数据来源:系统检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库至2024年8月22日。因为Cochrane图书馆包含了所有已确定的随机对照试验(RCTs),所以没有必要搜索ClinicalTrials.gov。以下词构成了搜索策略,应用于三个数据库:fezolinetant, elinzanetant,血管舒缩症状和绝经。研究选择方法:仅纳入比较非唑啉奈坦和依兰奈坦与安慰剂治疗绝经期妇女血管舒缩症状的随机对照试验。制表、整合和结果:我们提取了患者人数、平均年龄、体重指数(BMI)和接受卵巢切除术的患者人数。采用Mantel-Haenszel方法和95% ci对数据进行检验。采用I2统计量评估异质性。采用r4.3.2进行统计分析。7项随机对照试验共4087例患者纳入分析。Fezolinetant和elinzanetant与血管舒张症状频率降低相关:Fezolinetant 30 mg(平均差值2.16,95% CI, 1.54-2.79, I2=0%), Fezolinetant 45 mg(平均差值2.54,95% CI, 1.86-3.21, I2=0%)和elinzanetant 120 mg(平均差值2.99,95% CI, 1.74-4.23, I2=0%)。两种药物也显示血管舒张症状严重程度的降低:非唑啉奈特30 mg(平均差值0.20,95% CI, 0.09-0.33, I2=0%),非唑啉奈特45 mg(平均差值0.24,95% CI, 0.13-0.34, I2=0%)和埃利辛奈特120 mg(平均差值0.36,95% CI, 0.26-0.46, I2=0%)。依兰那坦120 mg显著改善睡眠质量(平均差异4.65,95% CI, 3.73 ~ 5.56, I2=0%)。依兰那坦120 mg与药物相关不良事件(11.70% vs 20.75%,风险比[RR] 0.57, 95% CI, 0.39-0.82, I2=19%)和头痛(2.54% vs 8.0%, RR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.16-0.64, I2=0%)的发生相关。结论:在这项荟萃分析中,一致的结果表明,非唑啉奈坦和依兰奈坦与有血管舒缩症状的绝经妇女的有益结果相关。与非唑啉奈坦相比,依兰那坦在降低血管舒缩症状频率和严重程度方面的效应量更大,并且显著改善了睡眠质量。系统评价注册:PROSPERO, CRD42023469952。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信