Electrosurgical Devices Used During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Toni S Horton, Paulette E Coombs, Yooree Ha, Zhen Wang, Tara J Brigham, Zenobia E Ofori-Dankwa, Olivia O Cardenas-Trowers
{"title":"Electrosurgical Devices Used During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.","authors":"Toni S Horton, Paulette E Coombs, Yooree Ha, Zhen Wang, Tara J Brigham, Zenobia E Ofori-Dankwa, Olivia O Cardenas-Trowers","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States and most are now being performed in a minimally invasive approach. Electrosurgery and vessel sealing devices are needed in order to provide hemostasis and vascular coaptation; however, there is no guiding evidence and limited recommendations for the use of the currently available devices for laparoscopic hysterectomy. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of electrosurgical devices used in benign hysterectomy and perform a meta-analysis to find the overall effect of various outcomes.</p><p><strong>Database: </strong>A systematic review was performed by searching the literature using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Science Citation Index Expanded, Emerging Sources Citation Index, Scopus, Epistemonikos, and SciELO databases from each database's inception date until May 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced bipolar vessel sealing devices demonstrate reduced blood loss and operative times when compared to conventional electrosurgery, however more high-quality evidence and cost analysis is needed to strengthen the clinical significance of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States and most are now being performed in a minimally invasive approach. Electrosurgery and vessel sealing devices are needed in order to provide hemostasis and vascular coaptation; however, there is no guiding evidence and limited recommendations for the use of the currently available devices for laparoscopic hysterectomy. The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic review of electrosurgical devices used in benign hysterectomy and perform a meta-analysis to find the overall effect of various outcomes.

Database: A systematic review was performed by searching the literature using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Science Citation Index Expanded, Emerging Sources Citation Index, Scopus, Epistemonikos, and SciELO databases from each database's inception date until May 2023.

Conclusion: Advanced bipolar vessel sealing devices demonstrate reduced blood loss and operative times when compared to conventional electrosurgery, however more high-quality evidence and cost analysis is needed to strengthen the clinical significance of these findings.

腹腔镜子宫切除术中使用的电手术器械。
背景:子宫切除术是美国最常见的外科手术之一,目前大多数采用微创方式进行。需要电手术和血管密封装置,以提供止血和血管覆盖;然而,目前尚无指导性证据和有限的建议用于腹腔镜子宫切除术。本研究的目的是对良性子宫切除术中使用的电手术设备进行系统回顾,并进行荟萃分析,以发现各种结果的总体效果。数据库:使用MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Cochrane Database of systematic review、Science Citation Index Expanded、Emerging Sources Citation Index、Scopus、Epistemonikos和SciELO数据库检索自各数据库建立日期至2023年5月的文献,进行系统综述。结论:与传统电手术相比,先进的双极血管密封装置可以减少出血量和手术时间,但需要更多高质量的证据和成本分析来加强这些发现的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信