Resolution of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events After Switching to a Doravirine-Based Regimen in the Open-Label Extensions of the DRIVE-AHEAD and DRIVE-FORWARD Trials.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Graeme Moyle, Fanxia Meng, Hong Wan, Peter Sklar, Rebeca M Plank, Rima Lahoulou
{"title":"Resolution of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events After Switching to a Doravirine-Based Regimen in the Open-Label Extensions of the DRIVE-AHEAD and DRIVE-FORWARD Trials.","authors":"Graeme Moyle, Fanxia Meng, Hong Wan, Peter Sklar, Rebeca M Plank, Rima Lahoulou","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs) are associated with several antiretrovirals. Doravirine (DOR), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for HIV-1 treatment, does not interact significantly with known neurotransmitter receptors in vitro. First-line therapy with DOR-based regimens resulted in significantly fewer NPAEs than efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF) and similar rates to those of ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) through Week 96 of the phase 3 DRIVE-AHEAD and DRIVE-FORWARD studies, respectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In DRIVE-AHEAD (NCT02403674) and DRIVE-FORWARD (NCT02275780), treatment-naive adults randomly received DOR/lamivudine/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF and DOR + 2 NRTIs or DRV/r + 2 NRTIs, respectively, for a 96-week double-blind phase; afterward, participants could continue or switch to a DOR-based regimen for a 96-week open-label extension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 269 and 233 participants in DRIVE-AHEAD and DRIVE-FORWARD, respectively, switched to a DOR-based regimen. At Week 96, 26 and 15 participants randomized to EFV/FTC/TDF and DRV/r + 2 NRTIs, respectively, had ongoing NPAEs, resolving by Week 192 in 73% (19/26) and 40% (6/15) of participants switching to a DOR-based regimen. New-onset NPAEs were reported by 9% (25/269) and 8% (18/233) of participants; by Week 192, new-onset NPAEs were resolved and/or resolving in 60% (15/25) and 61% (11/18) of participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In both trial extensions, NPAEs persisted in 3-4% of participants 96 weeks after switching to a DOR-based regimen, possibly representing the background rate for these events. This suggests DOR-based therapy may be a good option for adults with baseline neuropsychiatric symptoms or those experiencing NPAEs with other antiretrovirals.</p>","PeriodicalId":14588,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs) are associated with several antiretrovirals. Doravirine (DOR), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for HIV-1 treatment, does not interact significantly with known neurotransmitter receptors in vitro. First-line therapy with DOR-based regimens resulted in significantly fewer NPAEs than efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF) and similar rates to those of ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) through Week 96 of the phase 3 DRIVE-AHEAD and DRIVE-FORWARD studies, respectively.

Methods: In DRIVE-AHEAD (NCT02403674) and DRIVE-FORWARD (NCT02275780), treatment-naive adults randomly received DOR/lamivudine/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF and DOR + 2 NRTIs or DRV/r + 2 NRTIs, respectively, for a 96-week double-blind phase; afterward, participants could continue or switch to a DOR-based regimen for a 96-week open-label extension.

Results: Overall, 269 and 233 participants in DRIVE-AHEAD and DRIVE-FORWARD, respectively, switched to a DOR-based regimen. At Week 96, 26 and 15 participants randomized to EFV/FTC/TDF and DRV/r + 2 NRTIs, respectively, had ongoing NPAEs, resolving by Week 192 in 73% (19/26) and 40% (6/15) of participants switching to a DOR-based regimen. New-onset NPAEs were reported by 9% (25/269) and 8% (18/233) of participants; by Week 192, new-onset NPAEs were resolved and/or resolving in 60% (15/25) and 61% (11/18) of participants.

Conclusions: In both trial extensions, NPAEs persisted in 3-4% of participants 96 weeks after switching to a DOR-based regimen, possibly representing the background rate for these events. This suggests DOR-based therapy may be a good option for adults with baseline neuropsychiatric symptoms or those experiencing NPAEs with other antiretrovirals.

在DRIVE-AHEAD和DRIVE-FORWARD试验的开放标签扩展中,切换到以多拉韦林为基础的方案后神经精神不良事件的解决
背景:神经精神不良事件(NPAEs)与几种抗逆转录病毒药物有关。Doravirine (DOR)是一种用于HIV-1治疗的非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂,在体外不与已知的神经递质受体显著相互作用。在第96周的3期DRIVE-AHEAD和DRIVE-FORWARD研究中,一线治疗基于口服药物的方案导致的npae明显少于依非韦伦/恩曲他滨/富马酸替诺福韦二氧吡酯(EFV/FTC/TDF),与利托那韦增强的darunavir (DRV/r)联合2个核苷(t)逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTIs)的发生率相似。方法:在DRIVE-AHEAD (NCT02403674)和DRIVE-FORWARD (NCT02275780)中,未接受治疗的成人分别随机接受DOR/拉米夫定/TDF或EFV/FTC/TDF和DOR + 2 nrti或DRV/r + 2 nrti,为期96周的双盲期;之后,参与者可以继续或切换到基于dor的方案进行96周的开放标签延长。结果:总体而言,分别有269名和233名DRIVE-AHEAD和DRIVE-FORWARD的参与者切换到基于dor的方案。在第96周,分别随机分配到EFV/FTC/TDF和DRV/r + 2 NRTIs的26名和15名参与者有持续的NPAEs,到第192周,73%(19/26)和40%(6/15)的参与者切换到基于or的方案。9%(25/269)和8%(18/233)的参与者报告了新发NPAEs;到第192周,60%(15/25)和61%(11/18)的参与者的新发NPAEs得到缓解和/或缓解。结论:在两项延长试验中,3-4%的参与者在切换到基于dor的方案96周后仍存在NPAEs,可能代表了这些事件的背景发生率。这表明,对于有基线神经精神症状的成年人或服用其他抗逆转录病毒药物的NPAEs患者,以dor为基础的治疗可能是一个很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
490
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes​ seeks to end the HIV epidemic by presenting important new science across all disciplines that advance our understanding of the biology, treatment and prevention of HIV infection worldwide. JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes is the trusted, interdisciplinary resource for HIV- and AIDS-related information with a strong focus on basic and translational science, clinical science, and epidemiology and prevention. Co-edited by the foremost leaders in clinical virology, molecular biology, and epidemiology, JAIDS publishes vital information on the advances in diagnosis and treatment of HIV infections, as well as the latest research in the development of therapeutics and vaccine approaches. This ground-breaking journal brings together rigorously peer-reviewed articles, reviews of current research, results of clinical trials, and epidemiologic reports from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信