Enacting an Online Depression Community in China: The Community of Practice Perspective.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Xin Li, Kaibin Xu
{"title":"Enacting an Online Depression Community in China: The Community of Practice Perspective.","authors":"Xin Li, Kaibin Xu","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2448702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The dilemma of disclosing one's illness experiences in real life has led to a proliferation of online health communities. It is worth exploring the nature of such communities. Drawing on the community of practice (CoP) theory, this article explores how members enact online health communities by studying the support group \"Philosophical Treatment of Depression,\" one of the largest online depression communities in China. The findings show that participants enacted the CoP by constructing negative individual identities and positive collective identities, participating and engaging in the common enterprise, and building a shared repertoire. Constructing negative individual identities and positive collective identities enhanced group cohesion and clarified community goals. Participation and mutual engagement facilitated members' sharing of illness experiences and seeking/providing support in the community. Sharing treatment and coping experiences and tactics contributed to a shared repertoire that sustains the community. This study provides insights into understanding the nature of online health communities. It also has practical implications for social support to people living with depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2448702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dilemma of disclosing one's illness experiences in real life has led to a proliferation of online health communities. It is worth exploring the nature of such communities. Drawing on the community of practice (CoP) theory, this article explores how members enact online health communities by studying the support group "Philosophical Treatment of Depression," one of the largest online depression communities in China. The findings show that participants enacted the CoP by constructing negative individual identities and positive collective identities, participating and engaging in the common enterprise, and building a shared repertoire. Constructing negative individual identities and positive collective identities enhanced group cohesion and clarified community goals. Participation and mutual engagement facilitated members' sharing of illness experiences and seeking/providing support in the community. Sharing treatment and coping experiences and tactics contributed to a shared repertoire that sustains the community. This study provides insights into understanding the nature of online health communities. It also has practical implications for social support to people living with depression.

在中国建立网络抑郁症社区:实践社区的视角。
在现实生活中公开患病经历的困境导致了在线健康社区的激增。这类社区的本质值得探索。本文借鉴实践社区(CoP)理论,通过研究中国最大的抑郁症在线社区之一“抑郁症哲学治疗”支持小组,探讨成员如何建立在线健康社区。研究结果表明,参与者通过构建消极的个人身份和积极的集体身份,参与和参与共同的事业,以及建立共享的剧目来制定CoP。建构消极的个人认同和积极的集体认同增强了群体凝聚力,明确了社区目标。参与和相互参与促进了成员分享疾病经验,并在社区寻求/提供支持。分享治疗和应对经验和策略有助于共享维持社区的技能。这项研究为理解在线健康社区的本质提供了见解。它还对抑郁症患者的社会支持具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信