SCXRD, CSP-NMRX and microED in the quest for three elusive polymorphs of meloxicam.

IF 2.9 2区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
IUCrJ Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1107/S2052252524011898
Agata Jeziorna, Maura Malinska, Isaac Sugden, Piotr Paluch, Rafał Dolot, Marta K Dudek
{"title":"SCXRD, CSP-NMRX and microED in the quest for three elusive polymorphs of meloxicam.","authors":"Agata Jeziorna, Maura Malinska, Isaac Sugden, Piotr Paluch, Rafał Dolot, Marta K Dudek","doi":"10.1107/S2052252524011898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Crystal structure determination is a crucial aspect of almost every branch of the chemical sciences, bringing us closer to understanding crystallization, polymorphism, phase transitions, and the relationship between a structure and its physicochemical and functional properties. Unfortunately, many molecules notoriously crystallize as microcrystalline powders, providing a significant challenge in establishing their structures. In this work, we describe the crystal structure determination of three elusive polymorphs of the anti-inflammatory drug meloxicam (MLX) using three approaches, of which only one was successful for each crystal phase. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction allowed us to solve the structure of MLX-III, MLX-II was solved by a combination of NMR crystallography and crystal structure prediction (CSP) calculations, and MLX-V (Z' = 4 polymorph) was only solvable using electron diffraction. By considering the factors influencing the choice of crystal structure determination method, we showcase their strengths and weaknesses as an indication of their applicability. Additionally, we discuss the issues encountered in the CSP search for MLX-II and MLX-III (both Z' = 2 polymorphs) which turned out to be computationally elusive, in addition to being so in crystallization experiments. This indicates a complex crystal energy landscape for MLX and hints at more general challenges in CSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14775,"journal":{"name":"IUCrJ","volume":" ","pages":"109-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IUCrJ","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252524011898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crystal structure determination is a crucial aspect of almost every branch of the chemical sciences, bringing us closer to understanding crystallization, polymorphism, phase transitions, and the relationship between a structure and its physicochemical and functional properties. Unfortunately, many molecules notoriously crystallize as microcrystalline powders, providing a significant challenge in establishing their structures. In this work, we describe the crystal structure determination of three elusive polymorphs of the anti-inflammatory drug meloxicam (MLX) using three approaches, of which only one was successful for each crystal phase. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction allowed us to solve the structure of MLX-III, MLX-II was solved by a combination of NMR crystallography and crystal structure prediction (CSP) calculations, and MLX-V (Z' = 4 polymorph) was only solvable using electron diffraction. By considering the factors influencing the choice of crystal structure determination method, we showcase their strengths and weaknesses as an indication of their applicability. Additionally, we discuss the issues encountered in the CSP search for MLX-II and MLX-III (both Z' = 2 polymorphs) which turned out to be computationally elusive, in addition to being so in crystallization experiments. This indicates a complex crystal energy landscape for MLX and hints at more general challenges in CSP.

SCXRD, CSP-NMRX和microED寻找三种难以捉摸的美洛昔康多态性。
晶体结构的测定是化学科学几乎每个分支的一个重要方面,它使我们更接近于理解结晶、多态性、相变以及结构与其物理化学和功能性质之间的关系。不幸的是,许多分子结晶成微晶粉末,这给建立它们的结构带来了巨大的挑战。在这项工作中,我们使用三种方法描述了消炎药美洛昔康(MLX)的三种难以捉摸的多态性的晶体结构测定,其中每个晶体相只有一种成功。单晶x射线衍射使我们能够求解MLX-III的结构,MLX-II是通过核磁共振晶体学和晶体结构预测(CSP)计算相结合来求解的,而MLX-V (Z′= 4多晶)只能通过电子衍射来求解。通过考虑影响晶体结构测定方法选择的因素,我们展示了它们的优缺点,以表明它们的适用性。此外,我们讨论了MLX-II和MLX-III(都是Z' = 2多态性)的CSP搜索中遇到的问题,除了在结晶实验中也是如此,这些问题在计算上是难以捉摸的。这表明MLX的晶体能量格局复杂,并暗示CSP面临更普遍的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IUCrJ
IUCrJ CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARYCRYSTALLOGRAPH-CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
95
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: IUCrJ is a new fully open-access peer-reviewed journal from the International Union of Crystallography (IUCr). The journal will publish high-profile articles on all aspects of the sciences and technologies supported by the IUCr via its commissions, including emerging fields where structural results underpin the science reported in the article. Our aim is to make IUCrJ the natural home for high-quality structural science results. Chemists, biologists, physicists and material scientists will be actively encouraged to report their structural studies in IUCrJ.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信