{"title":"Visual-linguistic Diagnostic Semantic Enhancement for medical report generation.","authors":"Jiahong Chen, Guoheng Huang, Xiaochen Yuan, Guo Zhong, Zhe Tan, Chi-Man Pun, Qi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generative methods are currently popular for medical report generation, as they automatically generate professional reports from input images, assisting physicians in making faster and more accurate decisions. However, current methods face significant challenges: 1) Lesion areas in medical images are often difficult for models to capture accurately, and 2) even when captured, these areas are frequently not described using precise clinical diagnostic terms. To address these problems, we propose a Visual-Linguistic Diagnostic Semantic Enhancement model (VLDSE) to generate high-quality reports. Our approach employs supervised contrastive learning in the Image and Report Semantic Consistency (IRSC) module to bridge the semantic gap between visual and linguistic features. Additionally, we design the Visual Semantic Qualification and Quantification (VSQQ) module and the Post-hoc Semantic Correction (PSC) module to enhance visual semantics and inter-word relationships, respectively. Experiments demonstrate that our model achieves promising performance on the publicly available IU X-RAY and MIMIC-MV datasets. Specifically, on the IU X-RAY dataset, our model achieves a BLEU-4 score of 18.6%, improving the baseline by 12.7%. On the MIMIC-MV dataset, our model improves the BLEU-1 score by 10.7% over the baseline. These results demonstrate the ability of our model to generate accurate and fluent descriptions of lesion areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"104764"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Generative methods are currently popular for medical report generation, as they automatically generate professional reports from input images, assisting physicians in making faster and more accurate decisions. However, current methods face significant challenges: 1) Lesion areas in medical images are often difficult for models to capture accurately, and 2) even when captured, these areas are frequently not described using precise clinical diagnostic terms. To address these problems, we propose a Visual-Linguistic Diagnostic Semantic Enhancement model (VLDSE) to generate high-quality reports. Our approach employs supervised contrastive learning in the Image and Report Semantic Consistency (IRSC) module to bridge the semantic gap between visual and linguistic features. Additionally, we design the Visual Semantic Qualification and Quantification (VSQQ) module and the Post-hoc Semantic Correction (PSC) module to enhance visual semantics and inter-word relationships, respectively. Experiments demonstrate that our model achieves promising performance on the publicly available IU X-RAY and MIMIC-MV datasets. Specifically, on the IU X-RAY dataset, our model achieves a BLEU-4 score of 18.6%, improving the baseline by 12.7%. On the MIMIC-MV dataset, our model improves the BLEU-1 score by 10.7% over the baseline. These results demonstrate the ability of our model to generate accurate and fluent descriptions of lesion areas.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.