Anesthesia and Pain Management for Scoliosis Surgery: A Narrative Review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Małgorzata Reysner, Grzegorz Kowalski, Alicja Geisler-Wojciechowska, Tomasz Resyner, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis
{"title":"Anesthesia and Pain Management for Scoliosis Surgery: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Małgorzata Reysner, Grzegorz Kowalski, Alicja Geisler-Wojciechowska, Tomasz Resyner, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a narrative review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review was to summarize the current evidence and knowledge gaps regarding anesthesia and pain management for scoliosis surgery, including multimodal analgesia, and identify the best anesthetic approach to scoliosis surgery that ensures patient safety and pain relief even in the postoperative period, with minimal influence on SSEP monitoring.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Spinal surgeries and fusions for scoliosis are associated with high pain levels. Inadequate analgesia can cause patient dissatisfaction, delay recovery, and increase the risk of chronic pain. Despite serious side effects, opioids are the mainstay of pain medication after scoliosis surgery. However, increasing emphasis on minimizing opioids and accelerating recovery has increased the adoption of multimodal analgesic therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The literature review was performed on standards of care, a pain management protocol, current therapeutic options, and innovative treatment options for patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. The literature was reviewed through 4 electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Embase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 994 articles. Forty-seven relevant articles were selected based on relevance, recentness, search quality, and citations. Ten studies described the influence of different methods of anesthesia on neuromonitoring. Twenty-one researchers studied the effect of analgesics and coanalgesics on pain relief protocol. Nine studies treated regional anesthesia and its influence on pain management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most suitable anesthetic approach that does not disturb the neuromonitoring is obtained by combining total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with remifentanil and propofol with regional anesthesia, particularly erector spinae plane block (ESPB), as a part of a multimodal analgesia protocol.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: This was a narrative review.

Objective: The objective of this review was to summarize the current evidence and knowledge gaps regarding anesthesia and pain management for scoliosis surgery, including multimodal analgesia, and identify the best anesthetic approach to scoliosis surgery that ensures patient safety and pain relief even in the postoperative period, with minimal influence on SSEP monitoring.

Summary of background data: Spinal surgeries and fusions for scoliosis are associated with high pain levels. Inadequate analgesia can cause patient dissatisfaction, delay recovery, and increase the risk of chronic pain. Despite serious side effects, opioids are the mainstay of pain medication after scoliosis surgery. However, increasing emphasis on minimizing opioids and accelerating recovery has increased the adoption of multimodal analgesic therapy.

Materials and methods: The literature review was performed on standards of care, a pain management protocol, current therapeutic options, and innovative treatment options for patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. The literature was reviewed through 4 electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Embase.

Results: The initial search yielded 994 articles. Forty-seven relevant articles were selected based on relevance, recentness, search quality, and citations. Ten studies described the influence of different methods of anesthesia on neuromonitoring. Twenty-one researchers studied the effect of analgesics and coanalgesics on pain relief protocol. Nine studies treated regional anesthesia and its influence on pain management.

Conclusions: The most suitable anesthetic approach that does not disturb the neuromonitoring is obtained by combining total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with remifentanil and propofol with regional anesthesia, particularly erector spinae plane block (ESPB), as a part of a multimodal analgesia protocol.

Level of evidence: Level II.

脊柱侧凸手术的麻醉和疼痛管理:叙述性回顾。
研究设计:这是一个叙述性的综述。目的:本综述的目的是总结目前关于脊柱侧凸手术麻醉和疼痛管理的证据和知识差距,包括多模式镇痛,并确定脊柱侧凸手术的最佳麻醉方法,以确保患者安全和术后疼痛缓解,同时对SSEP监测的影响最小。背景资料总结:脊柱侧凸的手术和融合与高疼痛水平相关。不充分的镇痛可引起患者不满,延迟恢复,并增加慢性疼痛的风险。尽管有严重的副作用,阿片类药物是脊柱侧凸手术后的主要止痛药。然而,越来越强调减少阿片类药物和加速恢复,增加了多模式镇痛治疗的采用。材料和方法:对脊柱侧凸手术患者的护理标准、疼痛管理方案、当前治疗方案和创新治疗方案进行文献综述。文献通过PubMed、Cochrane Library、谷歌Scholar和Embase 4个电子数据库进行综述。结果:最初的搜索产生了994篇文章。根据相关性、近时性、搜索质量和引用率,选择了47篇相关文章。10项研究描述了不同麻醉方法对神经监测的影响。21位研究者研究了镇痛药和共镇痛药对疼痛缓解方案的影响。9项研究涉及区域麻醉及其对疼痛管理的影响。结论:在不干扰神经监测的情况下,采用瑞芬太尼和异丙酚全静脉麻醉(TIVA)联合局部麻醉,特别是竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)作为多模式镇痛方案的一部分,是最合适的麻醉方式。证据等级:二级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信