Long-term effect and safety of mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for radiation-induced hyposalivation in head and neck cancer survivors: A randomised, phase-2, trial.
Amanda-Louise Fenger Carlander, Kathrine Kronberg Jakobsen, Tobias Todsen, Natasja Paaske, Anne Kathrine Østergaard Madsen, Simone Kloch Bendtsen, Jens Kastrup, Jeppe Friborg, Charlotte Duch Lynggaard, Anne Werner Hauge, Robin Christensen, Christian Grønhøj, Christian von Buchwald
{"title":"Long-term effect and safety of mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for radiation-induced hyposalivation in head and neck cancer survivors: A randomised, phase-2, trial.","authors":"Amanda-Louise Fenger Carlander, Kathrine Kronberg Jakobsen, Tobias Todsen, Natasja Paaske, Anne Kathrine Østergaard Madsen, Simone Kloch Bendtsen, Jens Kastrup, Jeppe Friborg, Charlotte Duch Lynggaard, Anne Werner Hauge, Robin Christensen, Christian Grønhøj, Christian von Buchwald","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The long-term effect of adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ASCs) to restore radiation-induced salivary gland hypofunction in previous head and neck cancer patients have not been validated in larger settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was the 12-months follow-up of a randomised trial, including patients with hyposalivation. Patients were randomised to receive allogeneic ASCs or placebo in the submandibular glands. Primary endpoint was unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) followed by stimulated whole saliva, patient-reported outcomes (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Head and Neck Module and the Xerostomia Questionnaire) and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 120 enrolled patients, 117 (97.5%) were assessed at 12 months. Treatment with ASCs did not increase UWS compared to placebo: increase in UWS was 0.02 mL/min (95% CI 0.01 to 0.04) in the ASC group and 0.02 mL/min (95% CI 0 to 0.03) in the placebo group, p=0.56. ASCs reduced the symptom burden for dry mouth with -10.07 units (95% CI -13.39 to -6.75) compared to -4.15 units (95% CI -7.46 to -0.84) in the placebo group, p=0.01. Compared to placebo, ASCs did not improve sticky saliva (-9.27 vs. -4.55 units, p=0.13), swallowing (-4.50 vs. 3.49 units, p=0.5) or xerostomia -3.12 vs. -2.74 units, p=0.82). Treatment was safe and associated with a transient immune response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraglandular ACS therapy in the submandibular glands significantly relieved subjective dry mouth symptoms. Both ASCs and placebo increased UWS, but ASCs did not prove superior to placebo in restoring salivary gland function, based on salivary flow rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2663","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The long-term effect of adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ASCs) to restore radiation-induced salivary gland hypofunction in previous head and neck cancer patients have not been validated in larger settings.
Methods: The study was the 12-months follow-up of a randomised trial, including patients with hyposalivation. Patients were randomised to receive allogeneic ASCs or placebo in the submandibular glands. Primary endpoint was unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) followed by stimulated whole saliva, patient-reported outcomes (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Head and Neck Module and the Xerostomia Questionnaire) and safety.
Results: Of the 120 enrolled patients, 117 (97.5%) were assessed at 12 months. Treatment with ASCs did not increase UWS compared to placebo: increase in UWS was 0.02 mL/min (95% CI 0.01 to 0.04) in the ASC group and 0.02 mL/min (95% CI 0 to 0.03) in the placebo group, p=0.56. ASCs reduced the symptom burden for dry mouth with -10.07 units (95% CI -13.39 to -6.75) compared to -4.15 units (95% CI -7.46 to -0.84) in the placebo group, p=0.01. Compared to placebo, ASCs did not improve sticky saliva (-9.27 vs. -4.55 units, p=0.13), swallowing (-4.50 vs. 3.49 units, p=0.5) or xerostomia -3.12 vs. -2.74 units, p=0.82). Treatment was safe and associated with a transient immune response.
Conclusion: Intraglandular ACS therapy in the submandibular glands significantly relieved subjective dry mouth symptoms. Both ASCs and placebo increased UWS, but ASCs did not prove superior to placebo in restoring salivary gland function, based on salivary flow rate.
背景:脂肪源性间充质间质细胞(ASCs)对既往头颈癌患者放射诱导的唾液腺功能减退的长期影响尚未在更大的环境中得到验证。方法:该研究是一项随机试验的12个月随访,包括低通气患者。患者被随机分配接受同种异体ASCs或安慰剂治疗颌下腺。主要终点是未受刺激的全唾液(UWS),其次是受刺激的全唾液、患者报告的结果(欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷、头颈模块和口干问卷)和安全性。结果:在120例入组患者中,117例(97.5%)在12个月时进行了评估。与安慰剂相比,ASC治疗并未增加UWS: ASC组UWS增加0.02 mL/min (95% CI 0.01 ~ 0.04),安慰剂组UWS增加0.02 mL/min (95% CI 0 ~ 0.03), p=0.56。ASCs减轻了口干的症状负担-10.07单位(95% CI -13.39至-6.75),而安慰剂组为-4.15单位(95% CI -7.46至-0.84),p=0.01。与安慰剂相比,ASCs没有改善唾液粘稠(-9.27 vs -4.55单位,p=0.13)、吞咽(-4.50 vs. 3.49单位,p=0.5)或口干(-3.12 vs. -2.74单位,p=0.82)。治疗是安全的,并伴有短暂的免疫反应。结论:颌下腺腺内ACS治疗可显著缓解主观口干症状。ASCs和安慰剂均增加了UWS,但根据唾液流率,ASCs在恢复唾液腺功能方面并不优于安慰剂。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.