Sexual Harassment in Academic Anesthesiology: A Survey of Prevalence, Sources, Impact, and Recommendations.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007282
Maya J Hastie, Aaron Mittel, Vidya Raman, Joseph Szokol, Robert Whittington, Maria Bustillo, Shahla Siddiqui, Tracey Straker, Tetsuro Sakai, Valerie Armstead, Jeanine Wiener-Kronish, Chelcie Jewitt, George A Mashour
{"title":"Sexual Harassment in Academic Anesthesiology: A Survey of Prevalence, Sources, Impact, and Recommendations.","authors":"Maya J Hastie, Aaron Mittel, Vidya Raman, Joseph Szokol, Robert Whittington, Maria Bustillo, Shahla Siddiqui, Tracey Straker, Tetsuro Sakai, Valerie Armstead, Jeanine Wiener-Kronish, Chelcie Jewitt, George A Mashour","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A report by the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) showed that academic anesthesiology has the highest prevalence of sexual harassment among specialties for both men and women. We aimed to explore the prevalence, sources, and impact of sexual harassment on anesthesiologists in academic centers in the United States and Canada. We also sought recommendations for its mitigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey instrument was designed based on a previously published report, yielding 39 questions, including demographics and 4 open-ended questions. The survey was sent via email to Association of University Anesthesiologists (AUA) members, who were encouraged to share across academic anesthesiology departments in the United States and Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 626 responses were received; after exclusion of incomplete and nonfaculty responses, 484 complete survey responses were analyzed. 52.9% of respondents identified as men and 45.9% as women; 3 respondents (0.6%) identified as nonbinary, and 3 respondents (0.6%) preferred not to answer. 43.6% of respondents perceived there is sexual harassment in academic anesthesiology. Significantly more women than men reported presence of sexual harassment in academic medicine (65.3% vs 38.3%, P < .001), in academic anesthesiology (59.5% vs 30.1%, P < .001), and in their place of work (37.8% vs 18.3%, P < .001). 14.5% of men and 43.2% of women had experienced sexual harassment at least once in the past 12 months ( P < .001). 43.7% of women reported ever experiencing unwanted physical contact in the workplace compared to 16.8% of men; 74.3% of women reported ever experiencing verbal or nonverbal conduct in the workplace related to gender that caused embarrassment, distress, or offense compared to 24.6% of men ( P < .001). 8.2% of men reported feeling their clinical ability doubted, compared to 87.8% of women ( P < .001). Experiences of sexual harassment were most consistent with verbal and nonverbal behaviors that convey hostility, objectification, or exclusion of members of one gender. Colleagues from anesthesiology were most likely to be reported as the source of sexual harassment (44.6% of unwanted physical contact, 59% of verbal or nonverbal conduct). The impact was described along 4 themes: emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and professional. Participants made recommendations for eliminating sexual harassment by raising awareness, providing education, establishing reporting, offering support, and ensuring accountability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey confirms the high prevalence of sexual harassment in academic anesthesiology. The most common sources are anesthesiology colleagues. The recommendations for leaders and institutions include creating a professional environment free from harassment with support for targets and accountability for instigators.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":"856-867"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A report by the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) showed that academic anesthesiology has the highest prevalence of sexual harassment among specialties for both men and women. We aimed to explore the prevalence, sources, and impact of sexual harassment on anesthesiologists in academic centers in the United States and Canada. We also sought recommendations for its mitigation.

Methods: An anonymous online survey instrument was designed based on a previously published report, yielding 39 questions, including demographics and 4 open-ended questions. The survey was sent via email to Association of University Anesthesiologists (AUA) members, who were encouraged to share across academic anesthesiology departments in the United States and Canada.

Results: A total of 626 responses were received; after exclusion of incomplete and nonfaculty responses, 484 complete survey responses were analyzed. 52.9% of respondents identified as men and 45.9% as women; 3 respondents (0.6%) identified as nonbinary, and 3 respondents (0.6%) preferred not to answer. 43.6% of respondents perceived there is sexual harassment in academic anesthesiology. Significantly more women than men reported presence of sexual harassment in academic medicine (65.3% vs 38.3%, P < .001), in academic anesthesiology (59.5% vs 30.1%, P < .001), and in their place of work (37.8% vs 18.3%, P < .001). 14.5% of men and 43.2% of women had experienced sexual harassment at least once in the past 12 months ( P < .001). 43.7% of women reported ever experiencing unwanted physical contact in the workplace compared to 16.8% of men; 74.3% of women reported ever experiencing verbal or nonverbal conduct in the workplace related to gender that caused embarrassment, distress, or offense compared to 24.6% of men ( P < .001). 8.2% of men reported feeling their clinical ability doubted, compared to 87.8% of women ( P < .001). Experiences of sexual harassment were most consistent with verbal and nonverbal behaviors that convey hostility, objectification, or exclusion of members of one gender. Colleagues from anesthesiology were most likely to be reported as the source of sexual harassment (44.6% of unwanted physical contact, 59% of verbal or nonverbal conduct). The impact was described along 4 themes: emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and professional. Participants made recommendations for eliminating sexual harassment by raising awareness, providing education, establishing reporting, offering support, and ensuring accountability.

Conclusions: This survey confirms the high prevalence of sexual harassment in academic anesthesiology. The most common sources are anesthesiology colleagues. The recommendations for leaders and institutions include creating a professional environment free from harassment with support for targets and accountability for instigators.

学术麻醉学中的性骚扰:流行、来源、影响和建议的调查。
背景:美国医学院协会(AAMC)的一份报告显示,学术麻醉学在男性和女性专业中都是性骚扰发生率最高的。我们的目的是探讨在美国和加拿大的学术中心麻醉师性骚扰的患病率,来源和影响。我们还寻求了减轻其影响的建议。方法:基于先前发表的报告设计匿名在线调查工具,共产生39个问题,包括人口统计问题和4个开放式问题。该调查通过电子邮件发送给大学麻醉师协会(AUA)成员,鼓励他们在美国和加拿大的学术麻醉学部门之间分享。结果:共收到626份回复;在排除不完整和非教师回复后,分析了484份完整的调查回复。52.9%的受访者为男性,45.9%为女性;3名受访者(0.6%)认为是非二元的,3名受访者(0.6%)不愿意回答。43.6%的受访者认为学术麻醉学存在性骚扰。在学术医学(65.3%比38.3%,P < 0.001)、学术麻醉学(59.5%比30.1%,P < 0.001)和工作场所(37.8%比18.3%,P < 0.001)中,女性报告的性骚扰发生率明显高于男性。14.5%的男性和43.2%的女性在过去12个月内至少经历过一次性骚扰(P < 0.001)。43.7%的女性报告曾在工作场所经历过非自愿的身体接触,而男性的这一比例为16.8%;74.3%的女性报告曾在工作场所经历过与性别有关的言语或非言语行为,导致尴尬、痛苦或冒犯,而男性的这一比例为24.6% (P < 0.001)。8.2%的男性表示对自己的临床能力感到怀疑,而女性为87.8% (P < 0.001)。性骚扰的经历与表达敌意、物化或排斥某一性别成员的言语和非言语行为最为一致。麻醉科的同事最有可能被报告为性骚扰的源头(44.6%的非自愿身体接触,59%的言语或非言语行为)。这种影响被描述为四个主题:情感、认知、行为和职业。与会者提出了通过提高认识、提供教育、建立报告、提供支持和确保问责制来消除性骚扰的建议。结论:本调查证实了学术麻醉学中性骚扰的高发性。最常见的来源是麻醉科同事。对领导人和机构的建议包括创造一个没有骚扰的专业环境,支持目标和对煽动者问责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信