Impact of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage to control intracranial hypertension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective monocentric cohort

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Geoffrey Dagod, Marlène Laurens, Jean-Paul Roustan, Pauline Deras, Elie Courvalin, Mehdi Girard, Hugues Weber, Xavier Capdevila, Jonathan Charbit
{"title":"Impact of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage to control intracranial hypertension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective monocentric cohort","authors":"Geoffrey Dagod, Marlène Laurens, Jean-Paul Roustan, Pauline Deras, Elie Courvalin, Mehdi Girard, Hugues Weber, Xavier Capdevila, Jonathan Charbit","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05199-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"External lumbar drainage (ELD) of cerebrospinal fluid may help control intracranial pressure following a traumatic brain injury. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ELD in post-traumatic intracranial hypertension (IH). This retrospective monocentric cohort study was conducted in the trauma critical care unit of the regional Level-I trauma centre between January 2012 and December 2022. All traumatic brain injury patients with IH (≥ 22 mmHg despite optimal sedation) were included. Data collection focused on the duration and management of IH, complications related to ELD, and outcomes (6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]). The influence of ELD on the duration of IH was assessed using a multivariable Cox regression analysis, while its impact on the 6-month GOS (“unfavourable outcome” GOS 1–3, “good outcome” GOS 4–5) was evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Ninety patients (mean age 37 [SD, 16], injury severity score [ISS] 29 [IQR, 24–34]) were analyzed during the study period. Of these, 50 (56%) benefited from an ELD during their hospitalization (ELD group). The IH duration was significantly reduced in the ELD group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–2.87; p = 0.03]). One patient (2%) experienced a cerebral herniation following ELD placement, and two others (4%) developed device-associated meningitis. The ELD group was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of an unfavourable outcome (OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.13–0.77]; p = 0.011) compared to the no ELD group. ELD appears in our cohort to be a safe and effective strategy to control post-traumatic IH, with an acceptable benefit-risk ratio. Our analysis even suggests a potential outcome improvement in patients treated by ELD compared with those having no cerebrospinal fluid drainage.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05199-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

External lumbar drainage (ELD) of cerebrospinal fluid may help control intracranial pressure following a traumatic brain injury. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ELD in post-traumatic intracranial hypertension (IH). This retrospective monocentric cohort study was conducted in the trauma critical care unit of the regional Level-I trauma centre between January 2012 and December 2022. All traumatic brain injury patients with IH (≥ 22 mmHg despite optimal sedation) were included. Data collection focused on the duration and management of IH, complications related to ELD, and outcomes (6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]). The influence of ELD on the duration of IH was assessed using a multivariable Cox regression analysis, while its impact on the 6-month GOS (“unfavourable outcome” GOS 1–3, “good outcome” GOS 4–5) was evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Ninety patients (mean age 37 [SD, 16], injury severity score [ISS] 29 [IQR, 24–34]) were analyzed during the study period. Of these, 50 (56%) benefited from an ELD during their hospitalization (ELD group). The IH duration was significantly reduced in the ELD group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–2.87; p = 0.03]). One patient (2%) experienced a cerebral herniation following ELD placement, and two others (4%) developed device-associated meningitis. The ELD group was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of an unfavourable outcome (OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.13–0.77]; p = 0.011) compared to the no ELD group. ELD appears in our cohort to be a safe and effective strategy to control post-traumatic IH, with an acceptable benefit-risk ratio. Our analysis even suggests a potential outcome improvement in patients treated by ELD compared with those having no cerebrospinal fluid drainage.
腰椎脑脊液引流对控制严重创伤性脑损伤患者颅内高压的影响:一项回顾性单中心队列研究
外伤性脑损伤后腰外引流(ELD)脑脊液可能有助于控制颅内压。我们的目的是评估ELD治疗创伤后颅内高压(IH)的有效性和安全性。这项回顾性单中心队列研究于2012年1月至2022年12月在地区一级创伤中心的创伤重症监护病房进行。所有伴有IH的外伤性脑损伤患者(尽管使用了最佳镇静,但仍≥22 mmHg)均纳入研究。数据收集的重点是IH的持续时间和管理,ELD相关的并发症和结果(6个月格拉斯哥结果量表[GOS])。使用多变量Cox回归分析评估ELD对IH持续时间的影响,而使用多变量logistic回归分析评估其对6个月GOS的影响(“不利结果”GOS 1-3,“良好结果”GOS 4-5)。研究期间共分析90例患者(平均年龄37岁[SD, 16],损伤严重程度评分[ISS] 29 [IQR, 24-34])。其中50例(56%)在住院期间受益于ELD (ELD组)。ELD组IH持续时间显著缩短(风险比[HR] 1.74[95%可信区间(CI) 1.05-2.87;p = 0.03])。1名患者(2%)在植入ELD后出现脑疝,另外2名患者(4%)出现装置相关性脑膜炎。ELD组与不良结果的可能性较低显著相关(OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.13-0.77];p = 0.011)。在我们的队列中,ELD似乎是一种安全有效的控制创伤后IH的策略,具有可接受的收益风险比。我们的分析甚至表明,与不进行脑脊液引流的患者相比,接受ELD治疗的患者有潜在的预后改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信