Synergistic vs. complementary synbiotics: the complexity of discriminating synbiotic concepts using a Lactiplantibacillus plantarum exemplary study.

Microbiome research reports Pub Date : 2024-09-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.20517/mrr.2024.48
Michiel Kleerebezem, Jori Führen
{"title":"Synergistic <i>vs</i>. complementary synbiotics: the complexity of discriminating synbiotic concepts using a <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> exemplary study.","authors":"Michiel Kleerebezem, Jori Führen","doi":"10.20517/mrr.2024.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Synbiotics are defined as \"a mixture comprising live microorganisms and substrate(s) selectively utilized by host microorganisms that confers a health benefit on the host\". The definition discriminates between synergistic and complementary synbiotics. Synergistic synbiotics involve a direct interaction between the substrate and co-administered microbe(s), while complementary synbiotics act through independent mechanisms. Here, we evaluate the complexity of discrimination between these two synbiotic concepts using an exemplary study performed with a panel of <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> (<i>L. plantarum</i>) strains to identify strain-specific synergistic synbiotics that eventually turned out to work via a complementary synbiotic mechanism. This study highlights that assessing the <i>in situ</i> selectivity of synergistic synbiotics in the intestinal tract is challenging due to the confounding effects of the substrate ingredient on the endogenous microbiome, thereby raising doubts about the added value of distinguishing between synergistic and complementary concepts in synbiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94376,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome research reports","volume":"3 4","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome research reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synbiotics are defined as "a mixture comprising live microorganisms and substrate(s) selectively utilized by host microorganisms that confers a health benefit on the host". The definition discriminates between synergistic and complementary synbiotics. Synergistic synbiotics involve a direct interaction between the substrate and co-administered microbe(s), while complementary synbiotics act through independent mechanisms. Here, we evaluate the complexity of discrimination between these two synbiotic concepts using an exemplary study performed with a panel of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) strains to identify strain-specific synergistic synbiotics that eventually turned out to work via a complementary synbiotic mechanism. This study highlights that assessing the in situ selectivity of synergistic synbiotics in the intestinal tract is challenging due to the confounding effects of the substrate ingredient on the endogenous microbiome, thereby raising doubts about the added value of distinguishing between synergistic and complementary concepts in synbiotics.

协同与互补的合生学:利用植物乳杆菌的范例研究区分合生学概念的复杂性。
合生剂被定义为“由宿主微生物选择性利用的活微生物和底物组成的混合物,对宿主的健康有益”。该定义区分了协同和互补合生物。协同共生涉及底物和共同施用微生物之间的直接相互作用,而互补共生通过独立的机制起作用。在这里,我们利用一组植物乳杆菌(L. plantarum)菌株进行的示范性研究来评估这两种合成概念之间区分的复杂性,以确定菌株特异性的协同合成,最终证明是通过互补的合成机制起作用的。本研究强调,由于底物成分对内源性微生物组的混淆作用,评估协同合生剂在肠道中的原位选择性具有挑战性,从而对区分协同和互补概念在合生剂中的附加价值提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信