The impact of Dobbs v. Jackson on abortion training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs: A qualitative study

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Danielle Vachon , Marisa C. Hildebrand , Sarah Averbach , Jema Turk , Jody Steinauer , Sheila K. Mody
{"title":"The impact of Dobbs v. Jackson on abortion training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs: A qualitative study","authors":"Danielle Vachon ,&nbsp;Marisa C. Hildebrand ,&nbsp;Sarah Averbach ,&nbsp;Jema Turk ,&nbsp;Jody Steinauer ,&nbsp;Sheila K. Mody","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The Ryan Program collaborates with obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residency programs in the United States (U.S.) to ensure that abortion and contraception care are incorporated into resident curriculum as required. We sought to understand the impact of the <em>Dobbs v. Jackson</em> decision on OBGYN residency abortion training programs from the perspective of Ryan directors and to understand barriers and facilitators to maintaining abortion training in OBGYN residency programs post-<em>Dobbs</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We conducted qualitative, semi-structured in-depth interviews with Ryan program directors at U.S. academic medical centers. We coded the data iteratively and analyzed the data thematically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From January to April 2023, we conducted 24 interviews, representing 21% (<em>n</em> = 23) of eligible U.S. Ryan directors. Participants were evenly distributed across four geographic regions of the U.S.; 50% (<em>n</em> = 12) of participants were from programs in abortion-restrictive settings. Two themes emerged: (1) Ryan directors experienced stressors related to the administration of Ryan programs post-<em>Dobbs,</em> including perceived difficulty satisfying requirements for abortion training in restrictive states, burnout, and increased financial needs to support training partnerships. (2) Directors face challenges in recruitment and clinical care post-Dobbs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Increased state restrictions on abortion place logistical and financial burdens on OBGYN abortion training programs. <em>Dobbs</em> impacted training experiences across the U.S. and made it more difficult for many OBGYN residencies to provide abortion training.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>The research findings will inform strategies for improving the delivery of abortion education post-<em>Dobbs. We anticipate findings will enhance procedures to establish and maintain partnerships post-Dobbs and identify areas where philanthropy and advocacy can be effectively utilized.</em></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 110808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424005225","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The Ryan Program collaborates with obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residency programs in the United States (U.S.) to ensure that abortion and contraception care are incorporated into resident curriculum as required. We sought to understand the impact of the Dobbs v. Jackson decision on OBGYN residency abortion training programs from the perspective of Ryan directors and to understand barriers and facilitators to maintaining abortion training in OBGYN residency programs post-Dobbs.

Study design

We conducted qualitative, semi-structured in-depth interviews with Ryan program directors at U.S. academic medical centers. We coded the data iteratively and analyzed the data thematically.

Results

From January to April 2023, we conducted 24 interviews, representing 21% (n = 23) of eligible U.S. Ryan directors. Participants were evenly distributed across four geographic regions of the U.S.; 50% (n = 12) of participants were from programs in abortion-restrictive settings. Two themes emerged: (1) Ryan directors experienced stressors related to the administration of Ryan programs post-Dobbs, including perceived difficulty satisfying requirements for abortion training in restrictive states, burnout, and increased financial needs to support training partnerships. (2) Directors face challenges in recruitment and clinical care post-Dobbs.

Conclusions

Increased state restrictions on abortion place logistical and financial burdens on OBGYN abortion training programs. Dobbs impacted training experiences across the U.S. and made it more difficult for many OBGYN residencies to provide abortion training.

Implications

The research findings will inform strategies for improving the delivery of abortion education post-Dobbs. We anticipate findings will enhance procedures to establish and maintain partnerships post-Dobbs and identify areas where philanthropy and advocacy can be effectively utilized.
多布斯诉杰克逊案对妇产科住院医师堕胎培训的影响:一项定性研究。
目的:瑞安项目与美国妇产科住院医师项目合作,确保堕胎和避孕护理被纳入住院医师课程。我们试图从瑞安主任的角度了解多布斯诉杰克逊案对妇产科住院医师堕胎培训项目的影响,并了解多布斯案后妇产科住院医师项目中维持堕胎培训的障碍和促进因素。研究设计:我们对美国学术医疗中心的Ryan项目主管进行了定性的、半结构化的深度访谈。我们对数据进行迭代编码,并对数据进行主题分析。结果:从2023年1月到4月,我们进行了24次访谈,代表21% (n=23)符合条件的美国瑞安董事。参与者平均分布在美国的四个地理区域;50% (n=12)的参与者来自限制堕胎的项目。出现了两个主题:1)在多布斯之后,瑞安计划的主管们经历了与瑞安计划管理相关的压力源,包括在限制性州满足堕胎培训要求的困难,倦怠,以及支持培训伙伴关系的财政需求增加。2)多布斯后主任在招聘和临床护理方面面临挑战。结论:国家对堕胎限制的增加给妇产科堕胎培训项目带来了后勤和财政负担。多布斯影响了美国各地的培训经验,并使许多妇产科住院医师提供堕胎培训变得更加困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信