Out-of-pocket spending for cardiac rehabilitation and adherence among US adults.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alexandra I Mansour, Ushapoorna Nuliyalu, Michael P Thompson, Steven Keteyian, Devraj Sukul
{"title":"Out-of-pocket spending for cardiac rehabilitation and adherence among US adults.","authors":"Alexandra I Mansour, Ushapoorna Nuliyalu, Michael P Thompson, Steven Keteyian, Devraj Sukul","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves cardiovascular outcomes, adherence remains low. Higher patient-incurred out-of-pocket (OOP) spending may be a barrier to CR adherence. We evaluated the association between OOP spending for the first CR session and adherence.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Commercial and Medicare supplemental beneficiaries with a CR-qualifying event between 2016 and 2020 who attended at least 1 CR session within 6 months of discharge were identified in the MarketScan Commercial Database. OOP spending for the first session was categorized as zero or into 1 of 3 increasing tertiles of OOP spending. Poisson regression was used to determine the association between OOP-spending tertile and CR adherence, defined as the number of CR sessions attended within 6 months of discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43,992 beneficiaries attended at least 1 CR session. Of these, 35,883 (81.6%) paid $0, 2702 (6.1%) paid $0.01 to $25.39, 2704 (6.1%) paid $25.40 to $82.41, and 2703 (6.1%) paid at least $82.42 for the first session, constituting the first, second, and third OOP-spending tertiles, respectively. Compared with the zero-OOP cohort, the first-tertile cohort attended 13.5% (95% CI, 1.4%-27.1%; P  = .028) more CR sessions and the second- and third-tertile cohorts attended 11.9% (95% CI, -16.4% to -7.1%; P  < .001) and 30.9% (95% CI, -40.8% to -19.4%; P  < .001) fewer CR sessions on average, respectively. For every additional $10 spent OOP on the first CR session, patients attended 0.41 fewer sessions on average (95% CI, -0.65 to -0.17; P  < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with OOP spending, higher spending was associated with lower CR adherence, dose dependently. Reducing OOP costs for CR may improve adherence for beneficiaries with cost sharing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"30 12","pages":"651-657"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89637","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves cardiovascular outcomes, adherence remains low. Higher patient-incurred out-of-pocket (OOP) spending may be a barrier to CR adherence. We evaluated the association between OOP spending for the first CR session and adherence.

Study design: Retrospective analysis.

Methods: Commercial and Medicare supplemental beneficiaries with a CR-qualifying event between 2016 and 2020 who attended at least 1 CR session within 6 months of discharge were identified in the MarketScan Commercial Database. OOP spending for the first session was categorized as zero or into 1 of 3 increasing tertiles of OOP spending. Poisson regression was used to determine the association between OOP-spending tertile and CR adherence, defined as the number of CR sessions attended within 6 months of discharge.

Results: A total of 43,992 beneficiaries attended at least 1 CR session. Of these, 35,883 (81.6%) paid $0, 2702 (6.1%) paid $0.01 to $25.39, 2704 (6.1%) paid $25.40 to $82.41, and 2703 (6.1%) paid at least $82.42 for the first session, constituting the first, second, and third OOP-spending tertiles, respectively. Compared with the zero-OOP cohort, the first-tertile cohort attended 13.5% (95% CI, 1.4%-27.1%; P  = .028) more CR sessions and the second- and third-tertile cohorts attended 11.9% (95% CI, -16.4% to -7.1%; P  < .001) and 30.9% (95% CI, -40.8% to -19.4%; P  < .001) fewer CR sessions on average, respectively. For every additional $10 spent OOP on the first CR session, patients attended 0.41 fewer sessions on average (95% CI, -0.65 to -0.17; P  < .001).

Conclusion: Among patients with OOP spending, higher spending was associated with lower CR adherence, dose dependently. Reducing OOP costs for CR may improve adherence for beneficiaries with cost sharing.

美国成年人心脏康复和依从性的自付费用。
目的:尽管心脏康复(CR)改善了心血管预后,但依从性仍然很低。较高的患者自付费用(OOP)可能是CR依从性的障碍。我们评估了第一次CR会议的OOP支出与依从性之间的关系。研究设计:回顾性分析。方法:在MarketScan商业数据库中确定2016年至2020年期间有CR合格事件的商业和医疗保险补充受益人,这些受益人在出院后6个月内至少参加了1次CR会议。第一届会议的面向对象支出被归类为零或面向对象支出增加三分之一。泊松回归用于确定oop花费分值与CR依从性之间的关系,CR依从性定义为出院后6个月内参加CR会议的次数。结果:共有43,992名受益人参加了至少1次CR会议。其中,35,883人(81.6%)支付了0.2702美元(6.1%),支付了0.01美元至25.39美元,2704人(6.1%)支付了25.40美元至82.41美元,2703人(6.1%)至少支付了82.42美元,分别构成了第一、第二和第三个面向面向对象的支出。与零oop队列相比,前五分位数队列的发生率为13.5% (95% CI, 1.4%-27.1%;P = 0.028)更多的CR会议,第二和第三个五分位数的队列参加了11.9% (95% CI, -16.4%至-7.1%;结论:在有OOP支出的患者中,较高的支出与较低的CR依从性相关,且呈剂量依赖性。降低CR的OOP成本可以提高成本分担受益人的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信