Characteristics of accountable care organizations' preferred skilled nursing facility networks.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Louise Secordel, Lauren Hajjar, Jennifer Perloff, Robert E Mechanic
{"title":"Characteristics of accountable care organizations' preferred skilled nursing facility networks.","authors":"Louise Secordel, Lauren Hajjar, Jennifer Perloff, Robert E Mechanic","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the prevalence and characteristics of preferred skilled nursing facility (SNF) networks established by Medicare accountable care organizations (ACOs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of a 2019 Medicare ACO survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed surveys from 138 Medicare ACOs to assess preferred SNF network prevalence, characteristics, and challenges. Chi-square tests compared ACOs by proportion of ACO Medicare admissions going to preferred SNFs (higher vs lower network use).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results focus on the 77 ACOs that reported having a preferred SNF network (n = 77), with 38% being relatively new (formed in 2018 or 2019). Most ACOs (91%) did not offer financial incentives for preferred SNFs. ACOs reported a range of expectations of preferred SNFs, the most common being cost/quality data sharing (62%), automatic notification of patient admission or discharge (53%), and meeting length-of-stay targets (52%). ACOs also reported some clinical collaboration with preferred SNFs, with the top activity being developing condition-specific care pathways (49%). Commonly reported challenges included poor hospital discharge practices, SNFs' willingness to accept complex patients, and the availability of high-quality SNFs. ACOs with lower use of their preferred SNF network reported more difficulty impacting hospital referral patterns and receiving timely SNF admission notifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing preferred SNF networks is a known strategy among Medicare ACOs to manage postacute care spending and quality. Future research should document these partnerships more in depth and evaluate operational and financial alignment strategies among ACOs, hospitals, and SNFs in managing postacute care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"30 12","pages":"684-688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the prevalence and characteristics of preferred skilled nursing facility (SNF) networks established by Medicare accountable care organizations (ACOs).

Study design: Cross-sectional analysis of a 2019 Medicare ACO survey.

Methods: We analyzed surveys from 138 Medicare ACOs to assess preferred SNF network prevalence, characteristics, and challenges. Chi-square tests compared ACOs by proportion of ACO Medicare admissions going to preferred SNFs (higher vs lower network use).

Results: Results focus on the 77 ACOs that reported having a preferred SNF network (n = 77), with 38% being relatively new (formed in 2018 or 2019). Most ACOs (91%) did not offer financial incentives for preferred SNFs. ACOs reported a range of expectations of preferred SNFs, the most common being cost/quality data sharing (62%), automatic notification of patient admission or discharge (53%), and meeting length-of-stay targets (52%). ACOs also reported some clinical collaboration with preferred SNFs, with the top activity being developing condition-specific care pathways (49%). Commonly reported challenges included poor hospital discharge practices, SNFs' willingness to accept complex patients, and the availability of high-quality SNFs. ACOs with lower use of their preferred SNF network reported more difficulty impacting hospital referral patterns and receiving timely SNF admission notifications.

Conclusions: Establishing preferred SNF networks is a known strategy among Medicare ACOs to manage postacute care spending and quality. Future research should document these partnerships more in depth and evaluate operational and financial alignment strategies among ACOs, hospitals, and SNFs in managing postacute care.

问责护理组织首选熟练护理机构网络的特征。
目的:描述由医疗保险责任医疗组织(ACOs)建立的首选熟练护理机构(SNF)网络的患病率和特征。研究设计:2019年医疗保险ACO调查的横断面分析。方法:我们分析了来自138个医疗保险ACOs的调查,以评估首选SNF网络的患病率、特征和挑战。卡方检验比较ACOs选择首选snf的ACOs医保入院比例(网络使用率较高vs较低)。结果:结果集中在报告有首选SNF网络的77个aco (n = 77),其中38%是相对较新的(在2018年或2019年成立)。大多数ACOs(91%)没有为首选snf提供财务激励。ACOs报告了对首选snf的一系列期望,最常见的是成本/质量数据共享(62%),患者入院或出院的自动通知(53%),以及满足住院时间目标(52%)。ACOs还报告了与首选snf的一些临床合作,其中最重要的活动是开发特定疾病的护理途径(49%)。通常报告的挑战包括医院出院做法不佳、snf接受复杂患者的意愿以及高质量snf的可用性。较低使用首选SNF网络的aco报告说,影响医院转诊模式和及时接收SNF入院通知的困难更大。结论:建立首选SNF网络是医疗保险ACOs管理急性后护理支出和质量的已知策略。未来的研究应更深入地记录这些伙伴关系,并评估ACOs、医院和snf在管理急性后护理方面的业务和财务一致性策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信