Is the use of abduction pillows crucial for post-operative rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Mark M Cullen, Eric Warren, Eoghan T Hurley, Daniel E Goltz, Samuel Lorentz, Bryan S Crook, Kwabena Adu-Kwarteng, Jay M Levin, Christopher S Klifto, Oke A Anakwenze
{"title":"Is the use of abduction pillows crucial for post-operative rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?","authors":"Mark M Cullen, Eric Warren, Eoghan T Hurley, Daniel E Goltz, Samuel Lorentz, Bryan S Crook, Kwabena Adu-Kwarteng, Jay M Levin, Christopher S Klifto, Oke A Anakwenze","doi":"10.1177/17585732241309019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons often use abduction pillows after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but evidence for their benefits is limited. This study compares outcomes for patients using a sling with or without an abduction pillow post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing primary rTSA. Patients were grouped based on post-operative use of an abduction pillow or not. Data was collected at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. Primary outcomes included rates of post-operative dislocation, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients using an abduction pillow showed reduced forward flexion at 3 months (120° vs. 139°, p = 0.002) and 6 months (135° vs. 147°, p = 0.049). At 6 weeks, abduction was lower in the pillow group (90° vs. 124°, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in other range-of-motion metrics or patient-reported outcomes. Using no pillow did not increase dislocation risk (OR: 1.67, p = 0.60), infection, readmission, revision, or repeat surgery rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-operative sling use without an abduction pillow after rTSA appears safe, with no increase in complications and similar patient satisfaction and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732241309019"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241309019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgeons often use abduction pillows after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but evidence for their benefits is limited. This study compares outcomes for patients using a sling with or without an abduction pillow post-operatively.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing primary rTSA. Patients were grouped based on post-operative use of an abduction pillow or not. Data was collected at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. Primary outcomes included rates of post-operative dislocation, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes.

Results: Patients using an abduction pillow showed reduced forward flexion at 3 months (120° vs. 139°, p = 0.002) and 6 months (135° vs. 147°, p = 0.049). At 6 weeks, abduction was lower in the pillow group (90° vs. 124°, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in other range-of-motion metrics or patient-reported outcomes. Using no pillow did not increase dislocation risk (OR: 1.67, p = 0.60), infection, readmission, revision, or repeat surgery rates.

Conclusions: Post-operative sling use without an abduction pillow after rTSA appears safe, with no increase in complications and similar patient satisfaction and outcomes.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III.

外展枕的使用对反向全肩关节置换术后的术后康复至关重要吗?
背景:外科医生经常在逆行全肩关节置换术(rTSA)后使用外展枕,但其益处的证据有限。本研究比较了术后使用吊带或不使用外展枕的患者的结果。方法:对原发性rTSA患者进行回顾性分析。根据术后是否使用外展枕对患者进行分组。分别于6周、3个月、6个月、1年及最后随访时收集数据。主要结局包括术后脱位率、活动范围和患者报告的结局。结果:使用外展枕的患者在3个月时(120°vs. 139°,p = 0.002)和6个月时(135°vs. 147°,p = 0.049)前屈减少。6周时,枕头组外展较低(90°vs 124°,p = 0.01)。其他活动范围指标或患者报告的结果没有显著差异。不使用枕头不会增加脱位风险(OR: 1.67, p = 0.60)、感染、再入院、翻修或重复手术率。结论:rTSA术后无外展枕使用吊带是安全的,并发症未增加,患者满意度和结果相似。证据等级:治疗性III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信