Mark M Cullen, Eric Warren, Eoghan T Hurley, Daniel E Goltz, Samuel Lorentz, Bryan S Crook, Kwabena Adu-Kwarteng, Jay M Levin, Christopher S Klifto, Oke A Anakwenze
{"title":"Is the use of abduction pillows crucial for post-operative rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?","authors":"Mark M Cullen, Eric Warren, Eoghan T Hurley, Daniel E Goltz, Samuel Lorentz, Bryan S Crook, Kwabena Adu-Kwarteng, Jay M Levin, Christopher S Klifto, Oke A Anakwenze","doi":"10.1177/17585732241309019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons often use abduction pillows after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but evidence for their benefits is limited. This study compares outcomes for patients using a sling with or without an abduction pillow post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing primary rTSA. Patients were grouped based on post-operative use of an abduction pillow or not. Data was collected at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. Primary outcomes included rates of post-operative dislocation, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients using an abduction pillow showed reduced forward flexion at 3 months (120° vs. 139°, p = 0.002) and 6 months (135° vs. 147°, p = 0.049). At 6 weeks, abduction was lower in the pillow group (90° vs. 124°, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in other range-of-motion metrics or patient-reported outcomes. Using no pillow did not increase dislocation risk (OR: 1.67, p = 0.60), infection, readmission, revision, or repeat surgery rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-operative sling use without an abduction pillow after rTSA appears safe, with no increase in complications and similar patient satisfaction and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732241309019"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241309019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Surgeons often use abduction pillows after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but evidence for their benefits is limited. This study compares outcomes for patients using a sling with or without an abduction pillow post-operatively.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing primary rTSA. Patients were grouped based on post-operative use of an abduction pillow or not. Data was collected at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. Primary outcomes included rates of post-operative dislocation, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes.
Results: Patients using an abduction pillow showed reduced forward flexion at 3 months (120° vs. 139°, p = 0.002) and 6 months (135° vs. 147°, p = 0.049). At 6 weeks, abduction was lower in the pillow group (90° vs. 124°, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in other range-of-motion metrics or patient-reported outcomes. Using no pillow did not increase dislocation risk (OR: 1.67, p = 0.60), infection, readmission, revision, or repeat surgery rates.
Conclusions: Post-operative sling use without an abduction pillow after rTSA appears safe, with no increase in complications and similar patient satisfaction and outcomes.