Penicillin allergy management strategies relevant for clinical practice - a narrative review.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ileana-Maria Ghiordanescu, Nicolas Molinari, Ana-Maria Forsea, Rik Schrijvers, Cyrille Hoarau, Pascal Demoly
{"title":"Penicillin allergy management strategies relevant for clinical practice - a narrative review.","authors":"Ileana-Maria Ghiordanescu, Nicolas Molinari, Ana-Maria Forsea, Rik Schrijvers, Cyrille Hoarau, Pascal Demoly","doi":"10.2478/rjim-2024-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Penicillin allergy is the most commonly reported drug allergy, with prevalence rates ranging from 6% to 31% across various populations and geographic areas. The penicillin allergy label is linked to higher mortality and morbidity rates, extended hospital stays, increased readmission rates, and a greater reliance on second-line antibiotics. Research indicates that nearly 99% of those labeled as penicillin-allergic can tolerate the drug. However, alternative antibiotics are often prescribed without confirming the allergy, largely due to legal concerns regarding re-exposure. Even when a negative challenge test is conducted, non-allergist providers may remain hesitant to reintroduce penicillin. To address the considerable gap between reported and actual penicillin allergies, as well as to ensure the prompt use of penicillins by non-allergists, various management strategies have emerged in recent years. Although several comprehensive reviews have examined these strategies, selecting and applying the most suitable for routine practice is difficult. This narrative review focuses on the most relevant data regarding the efficiency of key penicillin allergy risk assessment tools, particularly those of clinical significance, and discusses their readiness for implementation in non-allergist settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21463,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjim-2024-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Penicillin allergy is the most commonly reported drug allergy, with prevalence rates ranging from 6% to 31% across various populations and geographic areas. The penicillin allergy label is linked to higher mortality and morbidity rates, extended hospital stays, increased readmission rates, and a greater reliance on second-line antibiotics. Research indicates that nearly 99% of those labeled as penicillin-allergic can tolerate the drug. However, alternative antibiotics are often prescribed without confirming the allergy, largely due to legal concerns regarding re-exposure. Even when a negative challenge test is conducted, non-allergist providers may remain hesitant to reintroduce penicillin. To address the considerable gap between reported and actual penicillin allergies, as well as to ensure the prompt use of penicillins by non-allergists, various management strategies have emerged in recent years. Although several comprehensive reviews have examined these strategies, selecting and applying the most suitable for routine practice is difficult. This narrative review focuses on the most relevant data regarding the efficiency of key penicillin allergy risk assessment tools, particularly those of clinical significance, and discusses their readiness for implementation in non-allergist settings.

与临床实践相关的青霉素过敏管理策略-叙述性回顾。
青霉素过敏是最常见的药物过敏,在不同人群和地理区域的患病率从6%到31%不等。青霉素过敏标签与较高的死亡率和发病率、延长的住院时间、增加的再入院率以及对二线抗生素的更大依赖有关。研究表明,近99%被标记为青霉素过敏的人可以耐受这种药物。然而,替代抗生素通常在没有确认过敏的情况下开处方,这主要是由于法律上对再次暴露的担忧。即使进行了阴性激发试验,非过敏专科医生也可能对重新引入青霉素犹豫不决。为了解决报告和实际青霉素过敏之间的巨大差距,以及确保非过敏专科医生及时使用青霉素,近年来出现了各种管理策略。尽管对这些策略进行了几次全面的审查,但选择和应用最适合日常实践的策略是困难的。这篇叙述性综述的重点是关于关键青霉素过敏风险评估工具效率的最相关数据,特别是那些具有临床意义的数据,并讨论了它们在非过敏医师环境中实施的准备情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine
Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Romanian Journal of Physics is a journal publishing physics contributions on the following themes: •Theoretical Physics & Applied Mathematics •Nuclear Physics •Solid State Physics & Materials Science •Statistical Physics & Quantum Mechanics •Optics •Spectroscopy •Plasma & Lasers •Nuclear & Elementary Particles Physics •Atomic and Molecular Physics •Astrophysics •Atmosphere and Earth Science •Environment Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信