Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Friedreich Ataxia Using Mobility Assistive Technologies: Limited Fit of the EQ-5D-3L Mobility Dimension.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1007/s40120-024-00694-7
Maresa Buchholz, Michelle Pfaff, Audrey Iskandar, Kathrin Reetz, Jörg B Schulz, Marcus Grobe-Einsler, Thomas Klockgether, Bernhard Michalowsky
{"title":"Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Friedreich Ataxia Using Mobility Assistive Technologies: Limited Fit of the EQ-5D-3L Mobility Dimension.","authors":"Maresa Buchholz, Michelle Pfaff, Audrey Iskandar, Kathrin Reetz, Jörg B Schulz, Marcus Grobe-Einsler, Thomas Klockgether, Bernhard Michalowsky","doi":"10.1007/s40120-024-00694-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Friedreich Ataxia (FA) is a multisystem neurodegenerative disease. Affected individuals rely on mobility assistive technologies (MAT) (e.g. wheelchairs) and require long-term treatments and care. To analyse the patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL), the EuroQol 5 Dimension 3 Level survey (EQ-5D-3L)-a widely used and recommended generic measure-is used in clinical and in health economic studies. Concerns about using the instrument in mobility-impaired individuals who might have difficulties finding appropriate response options for mobility-related items led us to investigate how the 3L dimensions perform in patients with FA using or not using MAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using longitudinal data from 607 patients with FA of the EFACTS study (from baseline to the 3-year follow-up), we analysed the acceptability, distribution properties, validity, and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, focusing on the mobility item. Analyses were stratified for patients without and with different MAT-usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified that n = 177 patients used no MAT, n = 299 a wheelchair and n = 131 walking aids. The mobility item non-response was highest in wheelchair users (6.8%) and lowest in patients without MAT. Walking aid users showed the least variability, all selecting the mid-response option \"some problems\" for mobility. The mobility item correlated moderately with disease severity (r<sub>sp</sub> = 0.35) and the activities of daily living scale (r<sub>sp</sub> = 0.36) in wheelchair users. No correlation exists for walking aid users. The strongest health changes occurred for wheelchair users, the weakest for walking aid users. The mobility dimensions showed the highest amount of no changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EQ-5D-3L's mobility item has limitations in MAT users, particularly in walking aid users, due to a tendency towards mid-responses. These limitations may affect the efficacy and (cost)effectiveness conclusions drawn from interventions and clinical trials with mobility-impaired individuals. Further research is needed to explore the understanding and interpretation of responses of the EQ-5D in patients with FA with mobility support.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02069509.</p>","PeriodicalId":19216,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"379-398"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-024-00694-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Friedreich Ataxia (FA) is a multisystem neurodegenerative disease. Affected individuals rely on mobility assistive technologies (MAT) (e.g. wheelchairs) and require long-term treatments and care. To analyse the patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL), the EuroQol 5 Dimension 3 Level survey (EQ-5D-3L)-a widely used and recommended generic measure-is used in clinical and in health economic studies. Concerns about using the instrument in mobility-impaired individuals who might have difficulties finding appropriate response options for mobility-related items led us to investigate how the 3L dimensions perform in patients with FA using or not using MAT.

Methods: Using longitudinal data from 607 patients with FA of the EFACTS study (from baseline to the 3-year follow-up), we analysed the acceptability, distribution properties, validity, and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, focusing on the mobility item. Analyses were stratified for patients without and with different MAT-usage.

Results: We identified that n = 177 patients used no MAT, n = 299 a wheelchair and n = 131 walking aids. The mobility item non-response was highest in wheelchair users (6.8%) and lowest in patients without MAT. Walking aid users showed the least variability, all selecting the mid-response option "some problems" for mobility. The mobility item correlated moderately with disease severity (rsp = 0.35) and the activities of daily living scale (rsp = 0.36) in wheelchair users. No correlation exists for walking aid users. The strongest health changes occurred for wheelchair users, the weakest for walking aid users. The mobility dimensions showed the highest amount of no changes.

Conclusion: The EQ-5D-3L's mobility item has limitations in MAT users, particularly in walking aid users, due to a tendency towards mid-responses. These limitations may affect the efficacy and (cost)effectiveness conclusions drawn from interventions and clinical trials with mobility-impaired individuals. Further research is needed to explore the understanding and interpretation of responses of the EQ-5D in patients with FA with mobility support.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02069509.

使用移动辅助技术的弗里德里希共济失调患者的健康相关生活质量:EQ-5D-3L移动维度的有限拟合。
简介:弗里德赖希共济失调(FA)是一种多系统神经退行性疾病。受影响的个人依赖行动辅助技术(MAT)(如轮椅),需要长期治疗和护理。为了分析患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL), EuroQol 5维度3水平调查(EQ-5D-3L)是临床和健康经济学研究中广泛使用和推荐的通用测量方法。考虑到在行动障碍患者中使用该仪器可能难以找到与行动相关的适当反应选项,我们调查了使用或不使用mat的FA患者的3L维度表现如何。利用EFACTS研究中607例FA患者的纵向数据(从基线到3年随访),我们分析了EQ-5D-3L的可接受性、分布特性、有效性和反应性,重点是活动能力项目。对未使用mat和使用不同mat的患者进行分层分析。结果:我们发现n = 177例患者未使用MAT, n = 299例使用轮椅,n = 131例使用助行器。在轮椅使用者中,活动项目无反应的比例最高(6.8%),在没有MAT的患者中最低。助行器使用者表现出最小的变异性,所有人都选择了中间反应选项“一些问题”。在轮椅使用者中,活动能力项目与疾病严重程度(rsp = 0.35)和日常生活活动量表(rsp = 0.36)存在中度相关。与助行器使用者没有相关性。轮椅使用者的健康变化最大,助行器使用者的健康变化最弱。流动性维度的变化幅度最大。结论:EQ-5D-3L的活动项目在MAT使用者中有局限性,特别是在助行器使用者中,由于倾向于中等反应。这些局限性可能会影响从干预措施和针对行动障碍个体的临床试验中得出的疗效和(成本)效益结论。需要进一步的研究来探索对具有活动能力支持的FA患者的EQ-5D反应的理解和解释。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT02069509。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology and Therapy
Neurology and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope Neurology and Therapy aims to provide reliable and inclusive, rapid publication for all therapy related research for neurological indications, supporting the timely dissemination of research with a global reach, to help advance scientific discovery and support clinical practice. Neurology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of neurological and psychiatric therapies, (also covering surgery and devices). Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also welcomed. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial designs, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Neurology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research. Rapid Publication The journal’s rapid publication timelines aim for a peer review decision within 2 weeks of submission. If an article is accepted, it will be published online 3-4 weeks from acceptance. These rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who closely manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with rapid peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model, this allows for the rapid and efficient communication of the latest research and reviews to support scientific discovery and clinical practice. Open Access All articles published by Neurology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning that authors will always have a personal point of contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. We also encourage pre-submission enquiries and are always happy to provide a confidential assessment of manuscripts. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Neurology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case-by-case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviews conflict, an Editorial Board Member will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed. Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised, it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor, and authors are welcome to make rebuttals against individual reviewer comments, if appropriate. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors'' or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Please see here for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Neurology and Therapy is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact managing editor Lydia Alborn at lydia.alborn@springer.com.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信