Association of continuous renal replacement therapy downtime with fluid balance gap and clinical outcomes: a retrospective cohort analysis utilizing EHR and machine data.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chloe Braun, Tomonori Takeuchi, Josh Lambert, Lucas Liu, Sarah Roberts, Stuart Carter, William Beaubien-Souligny, Ashita Tolwani, Javier A Neyra
{"title":"Association of continuous renal replacement therapy downtime with fluid balance gap and clinical outcomes: a retrospective cohort analysis utilizing EHR and machine data.","authors":"Chloe Braun, Tomonori Takeuchi, Josh Lambert, Lucas Liu, Sarah Roberts, Stuart Carter, William Beaubien-Souligny, Ashita Tolwani, Javier A Neyra","doi":"10.1186/s40560-024-00772-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluid balance gap (FBgap-prescribed vs. achieved) is associated with hospital mortality. Downtime is an important quality indicator for the delivery of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We examined the association of CRRT downtime with FBgap and clinical outcomes including mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of critically ill adults receiving CRRT utilizing both electronic health records (EHR) and CRRT machine data. FBgap was calculated as achieved minus prescribed fluid balance. Downtime, or percent treatment time loss (%TTL), was defined as CRRT downtime in relation to the total CRRT time. Data collection stopped upon transition to intermittent hemodialysis when applicable. Linear and logistic regression models were used to analyze the association of %TTL with FBgap and hospital mortality, respectively. Covariates included demographics, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at CRRT initiation, use of organ support devices, and the interaction between %TTL and machine alarms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 3630 CRRT patient-days from 500 patients with a median age of 59.5 years (IQR 50-67). Patients had a median SOFA score at CRRT initiation of 13 (IQR 10-16). Median %TTL was 8.1% (IQR 4.3-12.5) and median FBgap was 17.4 mL/kg/day (IQR 8.2-30.4). In adjusted models, there was a significant positive relationship between FBgap and %TTL only in the subgroup with higher alarm frequency (6 + alarms per CRRT-day) (β = 0.87 per 1% increase, 95%CI 0.48-1.26). No association was found in the subgroups with lower alarm frequency (0-2 and 3-5 alarms). There was no statistical evidence for an association between %TTL and hospital mortality in the adjusted model with the interaction term of alarm frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In critically ill adult patients undergoing CRRT, %TTL was associated with FBgap only in the subgroup with higher alarm frequency, but not in the other subgroups with lower alarms. No association between %TTL and mortality was observed. More frequent alarms, possibly indicating unexpected downtime, may suggest compromised CRRT delivery and could negatively impact FBgap.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"12 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00772-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fluid balance gap (FBgap-prescribed vs. achieved) is associated with hospital mortality. Downtime is an important quality indicator for the delivery of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We examined the association of CRRT downtime with FBgap and clinical outcomes including mortality.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of critically ill adults receiving CRRT utilizing both electronic health records (EHR) and CRRT machine data. FBgap was calculated as achieved minus prescribed fluid balance. Downtime, or percent treatment time loss (%TTL), was defined as CRRT downtime in relation to the total CRRT time. Data collection stopped upon transition to intermittent hemodialysis when applicable. Linear and logistic regression models were used to analyze the association of %TTL with FBgap and hospital mortality, respectively. Covariates included demographics, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at CRRT initiation, use of organ support devices, and the interaction between %TTL and machine alarms.

Results: We included 3630 CRRT patient-days from 500 patients with a median age of 59.5 years (IQR 50-67). Patients had a median SOFA score at CRRT initiation of 13 (IQR 10-16). Median %TTL was 8.1% (IQR 4.3-12.5) and median FBgap was 17.4 mL/kg/day (IQR 8.2-30.4). In adjusted models, there was a significant positive relationship between FBgap and %TTL only in the subgroup with higher alarm frequency (6 + alarms per CRRT-day) (β = 0.87 per 1% increase, 95%CI 0.48-1.26). No association was found in the subgroups with lower alarm frequency (0-2 and 3-5 alarms). There was no statistical evidence for an association between %TTL and hospital mortality in the adjusted model with the interaction term of alarm frequency.

Conclusions: In critically ill adult patients undergoing CRRT, %TTL was associated with FBgap only in the subgroup with higher alarm frequency, but not in the other subgroups with lower alarms. No association between %TTL and mortality was observed. More frequent alarms, possibly indicating unexpected downtime, may suggest compromised CRRT delivery and could negatively impact FBgap.

持续肾替代治疗停药时间与体液平衡间隙和临床结果的关联:利用电子病历和机器数据的回顾性队列分析
背景:体液平衡差距(fbgap规定vs.实现)与医院死亡率相关。停药时间是持续肾替代治疗(CRRT)的重要质量指标。我们研究了CRRT停药时间与FBgap和包括死亡率在内的临床结果的关系。方法:这是一项利用电子健康记录(EHR)和CRRT机器数据对接受CRRT的危重成人进行回顾性队列研究。FBgap计算为达到减去规定的流体平衡。停机时间,或治疗时间损失百分比(%TTL),定义为CRRT停机时间与总CRRT时间的关系。数据收集在过渡到间歇血液透析时停止。采用线性和逻辑回归模型分别分析%TTL与FBgap和住院死亡率的关系。协变量包括人口统计学、CRRT开始时的顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、器官支持装置的使用以及%TTL和机器报警之间的相互作用。结果:我们从500例中位年龄59.5岁(IQR 50-67)的患者中纳入了3630例CRRT患者日。患者在CRRT开始时的中位SOFA评分为13 (IQR 10-16)。中位TTL为8.1% (IQR为4.3-12.5),中位FBgap为17.4 mL/kg/day (IQR为8.2-30.4)。在调整后的模型中,仅在报警频率较高的亚组(每CRRT-day 6 +次报警)中,FBgap与%TTL之间存在显著正相关(每增加1%,β = 0.87, 95%CI 0.48-1.26)。在低报警频率(0-2次和3-5次)的亚组中没有发现关联。在调整后的模型中,%TTL和住院死亡率与报警频率的交互项之间没有统计学上的关联。结论:在接受CRRT的危重成人患者中,%TTL与FBgap仅在警报频率较高的亚组中相关,而在其他警报频率较低的亚组中无关。未观察到%TTL与死亡率之间的关联。更频繁的警报可能表明意外停机,这可能表明CRRT交付受损,并可能对FBgap产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信