Association between Comprehensive Primary Care Plus and opioid prescribing and prescription fills among Medicare beneficiaries.

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jelena Zurovac, Eunhae Shin, Joel Earlywine, Arkadipta Ghosh, Jonathan Brown
{"title":"Association between Comprehensive Primary Care Plus and opioid prescribing and prescription fills among Medicare beneficiaries.","authors":"Jelena Zurovac, Eunhae Shin, Joel Earlywine, Arkadipta Ghosh, Jonathan Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To examine if Medicare beneficiaries attributed to Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) practices had a greater decrease in the potential overuse of prescription opioids relative to beneficiaries attributed to other primary care practices. Primary care practices that participated in CPC+ received enhanced Medicare payment to support five functions: access and continuity of care, care management, comprehensiveness and coordination, patient and caregiver engagement, and planned care and population health. CPC+ practices participated within two tracks starting in 2017; Track 2 practices received larger payments to support more enhanced care delivery than Track 1 practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using difference-in-differences, we used Medicare claims and Part D data to examine changes in potential opioid overuse between 2016 (baseline) and 2021 (the fifth program year). Our measure of potential opioid overuse measure relies on specifications for an existing quality measure of the same name that is defined as filling opioid prescriptions at a daily dosage of 90 morphine milligram equivalents or more among beneficiaries who use opioids for at least 90 days of supply per year. A total of 40,219 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries used opioids long term and were attributed to 2888 CPC+ practices; 129,178 beneficiaries used opioids long term and were attributed to 6921 comparison practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the combined treatment and comparison groups, potential opioid overuse decreased from 19 % in 2016 to 12 % in 2021. Relative to the comparison group, beneficiaries attributed to Track 1 CPC+ practices experienced an 0.8 percentage point greater decrease in potential opioid overuse (95 % CI = -1.4, -0.2) in the third program year compared to baseline. These findings persisted in the fourth and fifth years and were similar in magnitude to those in the third year. Track 2 results were similar to Track 1 results. The findings were likely driven by changes in CPC+ clinicians' prescribing behaviors: clinicians in CPC+ practices reduced the average dosage and the number of days' supply of prescription opioids more than clinicians in comparison practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A large-scale primary care delivery transformation initiative was associated with reduced potential opioid overuse among Medicare beneficiaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":" ","pages":"209621"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2024.209621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To examine if Medicare beneficiaries attributed to Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) practices had a greater decrease in the potential overuse of prescription opioids relative to beneficiaries attributed to other primary care practices. Primary care practices that participated in CPC+ received enhanced Medicare payment to support five functions: access and continuity of care, care management, comprehensiveness and coordination, patient and caregiver engagement, and planned care and population health. CPC+ practices participated within two tracks starting in 2017; Track 2 practices received larger payments to support more enhanced care delivery than Track 1 practices.

Methods: Using difference-in-differences, we used Medicare claims and Part D data to examine changes in potential opioid overuse between 2016 (baseline) and 2021 (the fifth program year). Our measure of potential opioid overuse measure relies on specifications for an existing quality measure of the same name that is defined as filling opioid prescriptions at a daily dosage of 90 morphine milligram equivalents or more among beneficiaries who use opioids for at least 90 days of supply per year. A total of 40,219 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries used opioids long term and were attributed to 2888 CPC+ practices; 129,178 beneficiaries used opioids long term and were attributed to 6921 comparison practices.

Results: Across the combined treatment and comparison groups, potential opioid overuse decreased from 19 % in 2016 to 12 % in 2021. Relative to the comparison group, beneficiaries attributed to Track 1 CPC+ practices experienced an 0.8 percentage point greater decrease in potential opioid overuse (95 % CI = -1.4, -0.2) in the third program year compared to baseline. These findings persisted in the fourth and fifth years and were similar in magnitude to those in the third year. Track 2 results were similar to Track 1 results. The findings were likely driven by changes in CPC+ clinicians' prescribing behaviors: clinicians in CPC+ practices reduced the average dosage and the number of days' supply of prescription opioids more than clinicians in comparison practices.

Conclusions: A large-scale primary care delivery transformation initiative was associated with reduced potential opioid overuse among Medicare beneficiaries.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信