GPs' perspectives on care models integrating medical and non-medical services in primary care-a representative survey in Germany.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wolfram J Herrmann, Hendrik Napierala
{"title":"GPs' perspectives on care models integrating medical and non-medical services in primary care-a representative survey in Germany.","authors":"Wolfram J Herrmann, Hendrik Napierala","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02693-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health-related social problems are common in primary care. Different care models integrating medical and non-medical services in primary care have been tested and established nationally and internationally, such as social prescribing, social work in primary care, health kiosks and integrated primary care centres. The aim of our study was to explore the perspective of general practitioners (GPs) working in Germany on these four care models regarding their meaningfulness and if they would like to use them. Secondary objective was to explore factors influencing this assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a survey of a representative sample of GPs working in Germany. The questionnaire included questions on the assessment of the care models' meaningfulness and whether the GPs would like to use them. The analysis was carried out descriptively and using linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand four hundred thirty-nine GPs took part in the survey. Social prescribing and social work in primary care were rated as the most meaningful concepts. Over 65% of the GPs believed that using at least one of the care models would be beneficial. One in four GPs would even welcome the idea of integrating their practice into an integrated primary care center. Older age and male gender were associated with a more negative assessment of the care models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>German GPs consider integrating medical and non-medical services in primary care to be meaningful, yet they are somewhat skeptical about its practical implementation in daily practice. However, younger GPs in Germany are significantly more receptive to these models.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS-ID: DRKS00032585; Registration Date: September 1, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"25 1","pages":"441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02693-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health-related social problems are common in primary care. Different care models integrating medical and non-medical services in primary care have been tested and established nationally and internationally, such as social prescribing, social work in primary care, health kiosks and integrated primary care centres. The aim of our study was to explore the perspective of general practitioners (GPs) working in Germany on these four care models regarding their meaningfulness and if they would like to use them. Secondary objective was to explore factors influencing this assessment.

Methods: We conducted a survey of a representative sample of GPs working in Germany. The questionnaire included questions on the assessment of the care models' meaningfulness and whether the GPs would like to use them. The analysis was carried out descriptively and using linear regression.

Results: One thousand four hundred thirty-nine GPs took part in the survey. Social prescribing and social work in primary care were rated as the most meaningful concepts. Over 65% of the GPs believed that using at least one of the care models would be beneficial. One in four GPs would even welcome the idea of integrating their practice into an integrated primary care center. Older age and male gender were associated with a more negative assessment of the care models.

Conclusions: German GPs consider integrating medical and non-medical services in primary care to be meaningful, yet they are somewhat skeptical about its practical implementation in daily practice. However, younger GPs in Germany are significantly more receptive to these models.

Trial registration: German Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS-ID: DRKS00032585; Registration Date: September 1, 2023).

全科医生对初级医疗中医疗与非医疗服务相结合的护理模式的看法--德国代表性调查。
背景:与健康相关的社会问题在初级保健中很常见。在国家和国际上已经试验并建立了将医疗和非医疗服务纳入初级保健的不同护理模式,例如社会处方、初级保健中的社会工作、保健亭和综合初级保健中心。我们研究的目的是探讨在德国工作的全科医生(全科医生)对这四种护理模式的意义以及他们是否愿意使用它们的观点。次要目的是探讨影响这一评价的因素。方法:我们对在德国工作的有代表性的全科医生样本进行了调查。问卷包括对护理模式意义的评估以及全科医生是否愿意使用这些模式的问题。分析采用描述性和线性回归进行。结果:1439名全科医生参与了调查。社会处方和初级保健中的社会工作被评为最有意义的概念。超过65%的全科医生认为至少使用一种护理模式是有益的。四分之一的全科医生甚至欢迎将他们的实践整合到综合初级保健中心的想法。年龄越大,男性对护理模式的评价越负面。结论:德国全科医生认为在初级保健中整合医疗和非医疗服务是有意义的,但他们对其在日常实践中的实际实施有些怀疑。然而,德国年轻的全科医生明显更容易接受这些模式。试验注册:德国临床研究注册(DRKS-ID: DRKS00032585;报名日期:2023年9月1日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信