Management of T cell responses by anesthetic drugs-propofol & isoflurane in perioperative breast cancer patients: A prospective hospital-based study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Priyanka Saha, Deepanwita Das, Santosh Kumar Behera, Deepak Bhatia, Sunil Kumar, Srabanti Hajra, Dipkana Das, Deepa Chakrabarti, Dona Sinha
{"title":"Management of T cell responses by anesthetic drugs-propofol & isoflurane in perioperative breast cancer patients: A prospective hospital-based study.","authors":"Priyanka Saha, Deepanwita Das, Santosh Kumar Behera, Deepak Bhatia, Sunil Kumar, Srabanti Hajra, Dipkana Das, Deepa Chakrabarti, Dona Sinha","doi":"10.25259/jmr_2382_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives The choice of anesthetic for better perioperative conservation of immune responses has always been contentious. This study investigated the differential impact of the intravenous anesthetic, propofol, and the volatile anesthetic, isoflurane on the T cell immune responses, if any, among individuals going through perioperative breast cancer. Methods Perioperative blood samples (preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative) collected from participants with breast cancer in two arms namely isoflurane arm (n=50) and the propofol arm (n=50) were analyzed for T cell immune response using flow cytometry and ELISA. The interactions of anesthetics with CD4/CD8 were probed with molecular docking and molecular dynamic (MD) simulations. Results Linear mixed model analysis showed that isoflurane in comparison to propofol inhibited CD4+ helper (Th) [β-coefficient: -8.75; 95% CI: -13.00 to -4.51] and CD19+ B cell (β: -7.51; 95% CI: -15.46 to 0.44) frequencies during the intraoperative period in perioperative breast cancer patients. Further, interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-12 were significantly increased during the intra- and postoperative periods in the isoflurane group as compared to the propofol group. Molecular docking (MD) validated propofol's better binding energy with CD4/CD8 than isoflurane. MD simulations propagated that in contrast to isoflurane, propofol formed a more compact and stabilized structure with CD4/CD8, making the amino acid residues on the surface of CD4/CD8 inaccessible for any interaction. Interpretation & conclusions The clinical observations and the in silico findings exhibited that propofol in comparison to isoflurane better regulated T cell immuno-inflammatory response in perioperative breast cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"160 5","pages":"489-500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jmr_2382_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives The choice of anesthetic for better perioperative conservation of immune responses has always been contentious. This study investigated the differential impact of the intravenous anesthetic, propofol, and the volatile anesthetic, isoflurane on the T cell immune responses, if any, among individuals going through perioperative breast cancer. Methods Perioperative blood samples (preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative) collected from participants with breast cancer in two arms namely isoflurane arm (n=50) and the propofol arm (n=50) were analyzed for T cell immune response using flow cytometry and ELISA. The interactions of anesthetics with CD4/CD8 were probed with molecular docking and molecular dynamic (MD) simulations. Results Linear mixed model analysis showed that isoflurane in comparison to propofol inhibited CD4+ helper (Th) [β-coefficient: -8.75; 95% CI: -13.00 to -4.51] and CD19+ B cell (β: -7.51; 95% CI: -15.46 to 0.44) frequencies during the intraoperative period in perioperative breast cancer patients. Further, interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-12 were significantly increased during the intra- and postoperative periods in the isoflurane group as compared to the propofol group. Molecular docking (MD) validated propofol's better binding energy with CD4/CD8 than isoflurane. MD simulations propagated that in contrast to isoflurane, propofol formed a more compact and stabilized structure with CD4/CD8, making the amino acid residues on the surface of CD4/CD8 inaccessible for any interaction. Interpretation & conclusions The clinical observations and the in silico findings exhibited that propofol in comparison to isoflurane better regulated T cell immuno-inflammatory response in perioperative breast cancer patients.

麻醉药物异丙酚和异氟醚对围手术期乳腺癌患者T细胞反应的管理:一项前瞻性医院研究
背景与目的为更好地保护围手术期免疫反应,麻醉药物的选择一直存在争议。本研究调查了静脉麻醉剂异丙酚和挥发性麻醉剂异氟醚对围手术期乳腺癌患者T细胞免疫反应的不同影响。方法采用流式细胞术和酶联免疫吸附法对50例异氟醚组(n=50)和异丙酚组(n=50)乳腺癌患者围手术期(术前、术中、术后)血液进行T细胞免疫应答分析。通过分子对接和分子动力学(MD)模拟,探讨了麻醉药与CD4/CD8的相互作用。结果线性混合模型分析显示异氟醚与异丙酚相比可抑制CD4+辅助因子(Th) [β-系数:-8.75;95% CI: -13.00 ~ -4.51]和CD19+ B细胞(β: -7.51;95% CI: -15.46 ~ 0.44),发生于围手术期乳腺癌患者术中。此外,与异氟醚组相比,异氟醚组在术中和术后期间白细胞介素(IL)-10和IL-12显著增加。分子对接(MD)证实异丙酚与CD4/CD8的结合能优于异氟醚。MD模拟表明,与异氟醚相比,异丙酚与CD4/CD8形成了更紧密和稳定的结构,使得CD4/CD8表面的氨基酸残基无法进行任何相互作用。临床观察和计算机结果表明,与异氟醚相比,异丙酚能更好地调节乳腺癌围手术期患者的T细胞免疫炎症反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信