Evaluating general practitioners' focused lung ultrasound competence and findings in patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia in general practice.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julie Jepsen Strøm, Camilla Aakjær Andersen, Martin Bach Jensen, Janus Laust Thomsen, Christian B Laursen, Søren Helbo Skaarup, Hans Henrik Lawaetz Schultz, Malene Plejdrup Hansen
{"title":"Evaluating general practitioners' focused lung ultrasound competence and findings in patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia in general practice.","authors":"Julie Jepsen Strøm, Camilla Aakjær Andersen, Martin Bach Jensen, Janus Laust Thomsen, Christian B Laursen, Søren Helbo Skaarup, Hans Henrik Lawaetz Schultz, Malene Plejdrup Hansen","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2447083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate general practitioners' (GPs') ability to perform focused lung ultrasound (FLUS) following a training program and assess FLUS feasibility in general practice. Also, to describe FLUS findings and evaluate GPs' ability to interpret these in adults with acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) when pneumonia is suspected and assess GPs' perception of FLUS impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine GPs, using point-of-care ultrasound, completed a FLUS training program. Adults (≥ 18 years) with acute cough (< 28 days) and at least one other symptom of acute LRTI, where the GP suspected pneumonia, were subsequently included. All patients received FLUS. The GPs reported FLUS findings, feasibility, and perception of FLUS impact. Recorded FLUS videos from all patients were reviewed by two specialists (Specialist Reference). The specialists assessed FLUS image quality. Agreements between the GPs and the Specialist Reference on FLUS findings were used to evaluate GPs' ability to interpret FLUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 patients included, FLUS image quality was acceptable or higher in 84 patients (92.4%). FLUS proved feasible with only two scans not completed. The GPs reported FLUS pathological findings in 51.7% of patients in 78% agreement with the Specialist Reference and Cohen's kappa 0.56. Focal B-lines represented the most frequent pathological findings. The GPs perceived that FLUS impacted change in tentative diagnosis and/or plans for treatment and/or visitation in 29 (32.0%) of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After the training, the GPs performed FLUS well. Interpretation of FLUS pathology presence was of moderate agreement. The GPs perceived that FLUS had impact on patient management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04711031.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2447083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate general practitioners' (GPs') ability to perform focused lung ultrasound (FLUS) following a training program and assess FLUS feasibility in general practice. Also, to describe FLUS findings and evaluate GPs' ability to interpret these in adults with acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) when pneumonia is suspected and assess GPs' perception of FLUS impact.

Methods: Nine GPs, using point-of-care ultrasound, completed a FLUS training program. Adults (≥ 18 years) with acute cough (< 28 days) and at least one other symptom of acute LRTI, where the GP suspected pneumonia, were subsequently included. All patients received FLUS. The GPs reported FLUS findings, feasibility, and perception of FLUS impact. Recorded FLUS videos from all patients were reviewed by two specialists (Specialist Reference). The specialists assessed FLUS image quality. Agreements between the GPs and the Specialist Reference on FLUS findings were used to evaluate GPs' ability to interpret FLUS.

Results: Of 91 patients included, FLUS image quality was acceptable or higher in 84 patients (92.4%). FLUS proved feasible with only two scans not completed. The GPs reported FLUS pathological findings in 51.7% of patients in 78% agreement with the Specialist Reference and Cohen's kappa 0.56. Focal B-lines represented the most frequent pathological findings. The GPs perceived that FLUS impacted change in tentative diagnosis and/or plans for treatment and/or visitation in 29 (32.0%) of patients.

Conclusion: After the training, the GPs performed FLUS well. Interpretation of FLUS pathology presence was of moderate agreement. The GPs perceived that FLUS had impact on patient management.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04711031.

评估全科医生对疑似社区获得性肺炎患者的重点肺部超声能力和结果。
目的:评估全科医生(gp)在培训计划后进行聚焦肺超声(FLUS)的能力,并评估FLUS在全科实践中的可行性。此外,描述流感的发现并评估全科医生在怀疑患有肺炎的成人急性下呼吸道感染(LRTI)患者中解释这些发现的能力,并评估全科医生对流感影响的感知。方法:9名全科医生,使用即时超声,完成了流感培训计划。随后纳入急性咳嗽(< 28天)和至少一种急性下呼吸道感染其他症状的成年人(≥18岁),其中全科医生怀疑为肺炎。所有患者都接受了流感治疗。gp报告了流感病毒的发现、可行性和流感病毒影响的看法。两名专家审查了所有患者录制的流感视频(专家参考)。专家们评估了FLUS的图像质量。全科医生和专家参考之间关于流感诊断结果的协议被用来评估全科医生解释流感的能力。结果:在纳入的91例患者中,84例(92.4%)患者的FLUS图像质量可接受或更高。fluus被证明是可行的,只有两次扫描未完成。全科医生报告了51.7%的患者的FLUS病理发现,78%与专科参考文献和Cohen的kappa 0.56一致。局灶b线是最常见的病理表现。全科医生认为流感影响了29名(32.0%)患者的初步诊断和/或治疗计划和/或探视计划的改变。结论:经过培训,全科医生的FLUS表现良好。对流感病理表现的解释是中度一致的。全科医生认为流感对病人管理有影响。试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04711031。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信