Incidence and related factors of catheter-associated bloodstream infection in neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yan Pang, Jinzhu Fu, Ying Tan, Lina Zhang, Li Bai, Miaomiao Yan, Huimin Li, Xin Wang
{"title":"Incidence and related factors of catheter-associated bloodstream infection in neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yan Pang, Jinzhu Fu, Ying Tan, Lina Zhang, Li Bai, Miaomiao Yan, Huimin Li, Xin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the related factors of neonatal catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CABSI), and provide a basis for constructing a scientific and rational strategy for neonatal CABSI prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, MEDLINE-Ovid, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched for publications on neonatal CABSI from the time the database was established until September 30, 2023. The language of publications was not specified. Unpublished reports and gray studies were excluded. All cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies were included. A meta-analysis of the incidence and related factors of neonatal CABSI were made using Revman software. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic method, and the publication bias was analyzed with funnel plot tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 studies involving 34,743 patients from 13 different countries were included. There were 15 case-control, 15 cohort, and 5 cross-sectional studies, with 14 related factors discussed. All the studies scored high (score ≥ 6) in their overall quality. According to the meta-analysis, the incidence of neonatal CABSI was 5.93/1000 catheter days (OR = 5.29). The risk factors were identified and ranked as follows according to the degree of influence: 5-minute Apgar score (OR = 4.69), the number of punctures during the stay of the line (OR = 3.49), male (OR = 3.17), mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.73), catheter repair (OR = 2.66), lower gestational age at birth (OR = 2.47), femoral vein catheter (OR = 1.92), dwell time of the catheter (OR = 1.34), and lower birth weight (OR = 1.05). Establishing sterile barrier throughout was a protective factor (OR = 0.41). Subgroup analysis suggested that the study design, catheter type and year of publication might be the primary sources of heterogeneity. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the results. However, the funnel plot indicated a potential publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neonatal CABSI carries a significant morbidity rate and is influenced by numerous factors.</p><p><strong>Implications for clinical practice: </strong>It is crucial to underscore the necessity for additional longitudinal studies to explore evidence-based approaches to lowering the risk and ultimately reducing the incidence of CABSI. Registration The study protocol has been registered with the PROSPERO: CRD42023443697.</p>","PeriodicalId":94043,"journal":{"name":"Intensive & critical care nursing","volume":"88 ","pages":"103927"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive & critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify the related factors of neonatal catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CABSI), and provide a basis for constructing a scientific and rational strategy for neonatal CABSI prevention.

Methods: CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, MEDLINE-Ovid, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched for publications on neonatal CABSI from the time the database was established until September 30, 2023. The language of publications was not specified. Unpublished reports and gray studies were excluded. All cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies were included. A meta-analysis of the incidence and related factors of neonatal CABSI were made using Revman software. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic method, and the publication bias was analyzed with funnel plot tests.

Results: A total of 35 studies involving 34,743 patients from 13 different countries were included. There were 15 case-control, 15 cohort, and 5 cross-sectional studies, with 14 related factors discussed. All the studies scored high (score ≥ 6) in their overall quality. According to the meta-analysis, the incidence of neonatal CABSI was 5.93/1000 catheter days (OR = 5.29). The risk factors were identified and ranked as follows according to the degree of influence: 5-minute Apgar score (OR = 4.69), the number of punctures during the stay of the line (OR = 3.49), male (OR = 3.17), mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.73), catheter repair (OR = 2.66), lower gestational age at birth (OR = 2.47), femoral vein catheter (OR = 1.92), dwell time of the catheter (OR = 1.34), and lower birth weight (OR = 1.05). Establishing sterile barrier throughout was a protective factor (OR = 0.41). Subgroup analysis suggested that the study design, catheter type and year of publication might be the primary sources of heterogeneity. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the results. However, the funnel plot indicated a potential publication bias.

Conclusion: Neonatal CABSI carries a significant morbidity rate and is influenced by numerous factors.

Implications for clinical practice: It is crucial to underscore the necessity for additional longitudinal studies to explore evidence-based approaches to lowering the risk and ultimately reducing the incidence of CABSI. Registration The study protocol has been registered with the PROSPERO: CRD42023443697.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信