Missing History: Anarcha, Betsey, and Lucy's Legacy in Gynecologic Textbooks.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jennifer H Lee, Ciara Sanchez, Bria Johnson, Katherine L Woodburn, Cheryl B Iglesia
{"title":"Missing History: Anarcha, Betsey, and Lucy's Legacy in Gynecologic Textbooks.","authors":"Jennifer H Lee, Ciara Sanchez, Bria Johnson, Katherine L Woodburn, Cheryl B Iglesia","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The legacy of J. Marion Sims as the \"father of gynecology\" has become widely controversial among medical professionals and lay public because of ethical concerns surrounding the development of his surgical techniques and his exploitation of enslaved women for his experiments. Notably, in April 2018, the City of New York relocated a commemorative statue of Sims from Central Park following an art commission's investigation of his controversial practices. The relocation was viewed by many as a public acknowledgement of the contributions of Anarcha, Betsey, Lucy, and the other enslaved women to the advancement of gynecologic surgery. However, despite the increased public awareness of the women's sacrifices in recent years medical literature has not kept pace. We compared the portrayal of Sims and these enslaved women within current gynecology textbooks, prior editions, and historical medical literature. We found that gynecologic textbooks more often mention J. Marion Sims by name (74%) compared to the enslaved women he experimented on (24%). Neither current gynecologic surgery textbooks nor primary historical sources contain significant references to these women, meaning much of their story has been lost to history. While there has been increased public knowledge of the sacrifices of Anarcha, Betsey, and Lucy and other enslaved women, lay recognition is not enough. Full acknowledgment of their contributions necessitates crediting their roles in Sims' experiments and stating their names in medical literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The legacy of J. Marion Sims as the "father of gynecology" has become widely controversial among medical professionals and lay public because of ethical concerns surrounding the development of his surgical techniques and his exploitation of enslaved women for his experiments. Notably, in April 2018, the City of New York relocated a commemorative statue of Sims from Central Park following an art commission's investigation of his controversial practices. The relocation was viewed by many as a public acknowledgement of the contributions of Anarcha, Betsey, Lucy, and the other enslaved women to the advancement of gynecologic surgery. However, despite the increased public awareness of the women's sacrifices in recent years medical literature has not kept pace. We compared the portrayal of Sims and these enslaved women within current gynecology textbooks, prior editions, and historical medical literature. We found that gynecologic textbooks more often mention J. Marion Sims by name (74%) compared to the enslaved women he experimented on (24%). Neither current gynecologic surgery textbooks nor primary historical sources contain significant references to these women, meaning much of their story has been lost to history. While there has been increased public knowledge of the sacrifices of Anarcha, Betsey, and Lucy and other enslaved women, lay recognition is not enough. Full acknowledgment of their contributions necessitates crediting their roles in Sims' experiments and stating their names in medical literature.

失踪的历史:安那那、贝齐和露西在妇科教科书中的遗产。
摘要:J. Marion Sims作为“妇科之父”的遗产在医学专业人士和普通公众中引起了广泛的争议,因为他的外科技术的发展以及他在实验中剥削奴役妇女的伦理问题。值得注意的是,2018年4月,在一个艺术委员会对西姆斯有争议的做法进行调查后,纽约市从中央公园搬迁了西姆斯的纪念雕像。这次搬迁被许多人视为对安那加、贝齐、露西和其他被奴役妇女对妇科外科进步所做贡献的公开承认。然而,尽管近年来公众对妇女牺牲的认识有所提高,但医学文献并没有跟上。我们比较了目前的妇科教科书、以前的版本和历史医学文献中对西姆斯和这些被奴役妇女的描述。我们发现妇科教科书更经常提到J. Marion Sims的名字(74%),而不是他实验的被奴役妇女(24%)。目前的妇科外科教科书和主要的历史资料都没有包含这些妇女的重要参考资料,这意味着她们的大部分故事已经消失在历史中。虽然公众对安那加、贝齐、露西和其他被奴役妇女的牺牲的了解越来越多,但外行的认识还不够。要充分承认他们的贡献,就必须把他们在西姆斯实验中的作用归功于他们,并在医学文献中注明他们的名字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信