What Outcomes Are Associated with Learning About Colonialism and Its Impacts on Indigenous Peoples in Health Professional Programs? A Critical Integrative Review.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Perspectives on Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5334/pme.1407
Carolyn M Melro, Kimberly Matheson, Amy Bombay
{"title":"What Outcomes Are Associated with Learning About Colonialism and Its Impacts on Indigenous Peoples in Health Professional Programs? A Critical Integrative Review.","authors":"Carolyn M Melro, Kimberly Matheson, Amy Bombay","doi":"10.5334/pme.1407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada called upon health professional programs to teach about historical and on-going colonalism. Since these calls to action, there has been an increase in educational opportunities on the topic. Although it is generally assumed that learning about colonialism will reduce racism and improve allyship towards Indigenous Peoples, an evaluation of this assumption is needed.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>An integrated review of the literature was conducted to assess how participation in educational experiences is associated with learner outcomes and how they may vary according to course design considerations including the guiding framework, content foci, mode of delivery, activities, and duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies assessing outcomes of educational activities related to the legacy of colonialism identified in a previous scoping review, as well as any such studies published since then were included in the present study. Data synthesis was performed using content analysis of the results and discussions presented in the included papers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A review of 15 papers identified a backfire effect that was only evident among the studies that included a delayed post-evaluation timeframe. In two educational experiences, it was found that learners were more likely to express unfavourable attitudes towards Indigenous Peoples post-training. These educational opportunities were designed using a cultural safety framework and followed a similar course delivery (e.g., viewing of vodcasts, use of case studies) and provided similar content (historical policies, Indigenous cultural beliefs and practices).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings should be interpreted with caution but point to plausible implications related to the backfire effect of educational opportunities on learners' attitudes towards Indigenous Peoples post-training.</p>","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"677-683"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1407","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada called upon health professional programs to teach about historical and on-going colonalism. Since these calls to action, there has been an increase in educational opportunities on the topic. Although it is generally assumed that learning about colonialism will reduce racism and improve allyship towards Indigenous Peoples, an evaluation of this assumption is needed.

Purpose: An integrated review of the literature was conducted to assess how participation in educational experiences is associated with learner outcomes and how they may vary according to course design considerations including the guiding framework, content foci, mode of delivery, activities, and duration.

Methods: Studies assessing outcomes of educational activities related to the legacy of colonialism identified in a previous scoping review, as well as any such studies published since then were included in the present study. Data synthesis was performed using content analysis of the results and discussions presented in the included papers.

Results: A review of 15 papers identified a backfire effect that was only evident among the studies that included a delayed post-evaluation timeframe. In two educational experiences, it was found that learners were more likely to express unfavourable attitudes towards Indigenous Peoples post-training. These educational opportunities were designed using a cultural safety framework and followed a similar course delivery (e.g., viewing of vodcasts, use of case studies) and provided similar content (historical policies, Indigenous cultural beliefs and practices).

Conclusions: The findings should be interpreted with caution but point to plausible implications related to the backfire effect of educational opportunities on learners' attitudes towards Indigenous Peoples post-training.

在卫生专业课程中学习殖民主义及其对土著居民的影响会产生哪些结果?批判性综合评论》。
背景:加拿大真相与和解委员会呼吁卫生专业方案教授历史上和正在进行的殖民主义。自从这些行动呼吁以来,关于这一主题的教育机会有所增加。虽然一般认为,了解殖民主义将减少种族主义和改善对土著人民的盟友关系,但需要对这一假设进行评估。目的:对文献进行了综合回顾,以评估参与教育体验如何与学习者成果相关联,以及它们如何根据课程设计考虑因素(包括指导框架、内容重点、交付模式、活动和持续时间)而变化。方法:在之前的范围审查中确定的与殖民主义遗产有关的教育活动的评估结果的研究,以及自那时以来发表的任何此类研究都包括在本研究中。数据综合使用内容分析的结果和讨论提出了纳入的论文。结果:对15篇论文的回顾发现,只有在包括延迟后评估时间框架的研究中才有明显的适得其反的效果。在两次教育经历中,我们发现学习者更有可能对培训后的土著人民表达不利的态度。这些教育机会是根据文化安全框架设计的,遵循类似的课程交付(例如,观看视频,使用案例研究),并提供类似的内容(历史政策,土著文化信仰和习俗)。结论:研究结果应谨慎解释,但指出了与教育机会对学习者培训后对土著人民的态度产生反作用有关的合理暗示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO). Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信