Observational study of the third delay in emergency obstetric triage at the referral national hospital in Tanzania: Baseline survey

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Mugara Joseph Mahungururo, Shigeko Horiuchi, Eri Shishido
{"title":"Observational study of the third delay in emergency obstetric triage at the referral national hospital in Tanzania: Baseline survey","authors":"Mugara Joseph Mahungururo,&nbsp;Shigeko Horiuchi,&nbsp;Eri Shishido","doi":"10.1111/jjns.12639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to grasp the third delay using an observational method of actual nurses/midwives' practice overtime during care provision to emergency obstetric patients in a tertiary referral national hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective quantitative design was employed to observe the 24-h obstetric triage process from February 4 to March 7, 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>This study involved observations of 120 obstetric patients with mean maternal age of 29.1 years (SD = 5.5); 81.6% were between 20 and 35 years, 14.2% were over 35 years, and 4.2% were under 20 years. There were 99 (82.5%) pregnant women: 67.7% were preterm, 29.3% term, and 3% postdate, and there were 21 (17.5%) postpartum women. Initial diagnoses were postpartum hemorrhage, 9 (7.5%), antepartum hemorrhage, 15 (12.5%), eclampsia, 13 (10.8), severe preeclampsia, 19 (15.9), preeclampsia, 12 (10%), obstructed labor, 3 (2.5%), previous scar, 13 (10.8%), and others, 36 (30%). Waiting time was within 15 minutes for 30.8% of the observations. Median waiting time from registration to consultation was 9 min. Interquartile range (IQR) for postpartum hemorrhage was 3.5–23.5 min, and IQR for eclampsia was 11.5–117.5. There were no maternal deaths during the 24-h observation of each obstetric patient.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The obstetric triage process requires additional training for triaging time-sensitive obstetric complications; the wide IQR of waiting time indicated management misalignments thus causing the third delay. The clinical priority of obstetric patients with leading risk factors for morbidity and mortality, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and hemorrhage, needs to be approached within a continuum of care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50265,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jjns.12639","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to grasp the third delay using an observational method of actual nurses/midwives' practice overtime during care provision to emergency obstetric patients in a tertiary referral national hospital.

Methods

A prospective quantitative design was employed to observe the 24-h obstetric triage process from February 4 to March 7, 2023.

Results

This study involved observations of 120 obstetric patients with mean maternal age of 29.1 years (SD = 5.5); 81.6% were between 20 and 35 years, 14.2% were over 35 years, and 4.2% were under 20 years. There were 99 (82.5%) pregnant women: 67.7% were preterm, 29.3% term, and 3% postdate, and there were 21 (17.5%) postpartum women. Initial diagnoses were postpartum hemorrhage, 9 (7.5%), antepartum hemorrhage, 15 (12.5%), eclampsia, 13 (10.8), severe preeclampsia, 19 (15.9), preeclampsia, 12 (10%), obstructed labor, 3 (2.5%), previous scar, 13 (10.8%), and others, 36 (30%). Waiting time was within 15 minutes for 30.8% of the observations. Median waiting time from registration to consultation was 9 min. Interquartile range (IQR) for postpartum hemorrhage was 3.5–23.5 min, and IQR for eclampsia was 11.5–117.5. There were no maternal deaths during the 24-h observation of each obstetric patient.

Conclusion

The obstetric triage process requires additional training for triaging time-sensitive obstetric complications; the wide IQR of waiting time indicated management misalignments thus causing the third delay. The clinical priority of obstetric patients with leading risk factors for morbidity and mortality, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and hemorrhage, needs to be approached within a continuum of care.

坦桑尼亚国家转诊医院产科急诊分诊第三次延误的观察研究:基线调查。
目的:本研究旨在通过观察一家国立三级转诊医院的护士/助产士在为产科急诊病人提供护理时的实际加班情况,掌握第三次延误的情况:方法:采用前瞻性定量设计,观察2023年2月4日至3月7日的24小时产科分诊过程:本研究共观察了 120 名产科病人,产妇平均年龄为 29.1 岁(SD = 5.5);81.6% 的产妇年龄在 20 至 35 岁之间,14.2% 的产妇年龄在 35 岁以上,4.2% 的产妇年龄在 20 岁以下。共有 99 名(82.5%)孕妇:67.7% 为早产,29.3% 为足月,3% 为过期,还有 21 名(17.5%)产后妇女。初步诊断为产后出血 9 例(7.5%)、产前出血 15 例(12.5%)、子痫 13 例(10.8%)、重度子痫前期 19 例(15.9%)、子痫前期 12 例(10%)、难产 3 例(2.5%)、既往疤痕 13 例(10.8%)和其他 36 例(30%)。30.8%的观察对象的候诊时间在 15 分钟以内。从登记到就诊的等候时间中位数为 9 分钟。产后出血的四分位数间距(IQR)为 3.5-23.5 分钟,子痫的四分位数间距(IQR)为 11.5-117.5 分钟。在对每位产科病人进行 24 小时观察期间,没有产妇死亡:结论:产科分诊过程需要额外的培训,以便对时间敏感的产科并发症进行分诊;等待时间的IQR较宽,表明管理上存在偏差,从而导致了第三次延误。产科病人具有发病和死亡的主要风险因素,如妊娠高血压疾病和大出血,其临床优先次序需要在连续护理中加以处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japan Journal of Nursing Science is the official English language journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Science. The purpose of the Journal is to provide a mechanism to share knowledge related to improving health care and promoting the development of nursing. The Journal seeks original manuscripts reporting scholarly work on the art and science of nursing. Original articles may be empirical and qualitative studies, review articles, methodological articles, brief reports, case studies and letters to the Editor. Please see Instructions for Authors for detailed authorship qualification requirement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信