Comparison of crisis response planning and treatment as usual for active duty service members at risk for suicide: Study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in a military treatment facility.
Kristen H Walter, Pia R Khandekar, Alexander C Kline, Erin L Miggantz, Nicholas P Otis, Lisa H Glassman, Cynthia J Thomsen, Guy Brock, Craig J Bryan
{"title":"Comparison of crisis response planning and treatment as usual for active duty service members at risk for suicide: Study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in a military treatment facility.","authors":"Kristen H Walter, Pia R Khandekar, Alexander C Kline, Erin L Miggantz, Nicholas P Otis, Lisa H Glassman, Cynthia J Thomsen, Guy Brock, Craig J Bryan","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide is one of the leading causes of death among U.S. service members, and rates of suicide among military personnel have increased over the past two decades. To address this serious issue, effective preventive treatments are needed in settings where at-risk service members are frequently seen, such as emergency departments and inpatient psychiatric units. This study will compare the longitudinal effects of crisis response planning (CRP) and treatment as usual (TAU) on suicidal thoughts and behaviors among active duty service members seeking emergent care for suicidality at a military treatment facility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study is conducted through a consortium, Augmenting Suicide Prevention Interventions for Service Members. This article details an ongoing stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial that compares rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors among service members at risk for suicide following care from CRP-trained providers versus untrained providers (i.e., TAU). Participants complete assessments at pretreatment and every 3 months up to 1 year. Primary outcomes include suicide attempts and behaviors, and suicidal ideation is a secondary outcome. Moderators of treatment effects will also be examined. The methodological development of this trial is discussed, along with clinical and ethical considerations for suicide prevention research in emergency, inpatient, and military treatment settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Providing evidence-based treatment for suicidality that addresses service members' unique needs is crucial to reduce suicide rates and facilitate mental health recovery in this population. This study aims to inform future implementation and dissemination of CRP in healthcare systems to ultimately decrease suicide among service members.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials identifier: </strong>NCT05795764.</p>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"42 ","pages":"101407"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Suicide is one of the leading causes of death among U.S. service members, and rates of suicide among military personnel have increased over the past two decades. To address this serious issue, effective preventive treatments are needed in settings where at-risk service members are frequently seen, such as emergency departments and inpatient psychiatric units. This study will compare the longitudinal effects of crisis response planning (CRP) and treatment as usual (TAU) on suicidal thoughts and behaviors among active duty service members seeking emergent care for suicidality at a military treatment facility.
Methods: The current study is conducted through a consortium, Augmenting Suicide Prevention Interventions for Service Members. This article details an ongoing stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial that compares rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors among service members at risk for suicide following care from CRP-trained providers versus untrained providers (i.e., TAU). Participants complete assessments at pretreatment and every 3 months up to 1 year. Primary outcomes include suicide attempts and behaviors, and suicidal ideation is a secondary outcome. Moderators of treatment effects will also be examined. The methodological development of this trial is discussed, along with clinical and ethical considerations for suicide prevention research in emergency, inpatient, and military treatment settings.
Conclusion: Providing evidence-based treatment for suicidality that addresses service members' unique needs is crucial to reduce suicide rates and facilitate mental health recovery in this population. This study aims to inform future implementation and dissemination of CRP in healthcare systems to ultimately decrease suicide among service members.
期刊介绍：
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
