Telehealth use in the well-child health setting. A systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness for families and practitioners

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Kim Howland , Kristina Edvardsson , Helen Lees , Leesa Hooker
{"title":"Telehealth use in the well-child health setting. A systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness for families and practitioners","authors":"Kim Howland ,&nbsp;Kristina Edvardsson ,&nbsp;Helen Lees ,&nbsp;Leesa Hooker","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Universal well-child health nursing services in high-resource countries promote the health and well-being of children and families while preventing health inequities. The COVID-19 pandemic and technological advancements have led to the increased use of telehealth in this field. To enhance policies and practices, it's important to understand the acceptability and effectiveness of telehealth, as well as the barriers and enablers to its implementation, and to determine when its use is appropriate and safe.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the global evidence on the use of telehealth in well-child health settings within high-income countries. Focussing on the effectiveness and acceptability of telehealth, along with the factors affecting its implementation and the considerations for safety from the perspectives of both providers and families.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A mixed methods systematic review</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria for the review included: primary research papers written in English, conducted in high-income countries, focused on telehealth in the well-child health setting, and involving children under six years of age. The search, which was completed in July 2023, systematically explored the CINAHL, ProQuest Central, PubMed, and Web of Science bibliographic databases. Studies were critically appraised for quality, and relevant data extracted. A convergent segregated approach was employed to synthesise both quantitative and qualitative data, which is presented in a narrative format.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 4,354 records were identified and screened, and 169 full-text papers were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 20 papers for inclusion. Telehealth acceptability among families was reported in 13 of the 20 studies reviewed, with participants expressing high satisfaction regarding its use as a complement to standard care. Only three studies examined practitioners' acceptance, revealing mixed responses. Effectiveness was observed in 15 studies, with no significant differences found between the control and telehealth groups, suggesting that telehealth may achieve outcomes like those of standard care. Four studies identified both enablers and barriers to the implementation of telehealth, though none addressed concerns regarding safety and appropriateness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Telehealth shows promise for well-child health services, but there is limited evidence of its effectiveness and safety. The COVID-19 pandemic increased its use, yet risks need further exploration. To validate telehealth in this field, we must identify effective applications, tackle implementation barriers, and ensure client safety. Additional research is essential for developing evidence-based policies for future practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100277"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24001048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Universal well-child health nursing services in high-resource countries promote the health and well-being of children and families while preventing health inequities. The COVID-19 pandemic and technological advancements have led to the increased use of telehealth in this field. To enhance policies and practices, it's important to understand the acceptability and effectiveness of telehealth, as well as the barriers and enablers to its implementation, and to determine when its use is appropriate and safe.

Objective

To explore the global evidence on the use of telehealth in well-child health settings within high-income countries. Focussing on the effectiveness and acceptability of telehealth, along with the factors affecting its implementation and the considerations for safety from the perspectives of both providers and families.

Design

A mixed methods systematic review

Methods

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria for the review included: primary research papers written in English, conducted in high-income countries, focused on telehealth in the well-child health setting, and involving children under six years of age. The search, which was completed in July 2023, systematically explored the CINAHL, ProQuest Central, PubMed, and Web of Science bibliographic databases. Studies were critically appraised for quality, and relevant data extracted. A convergent segregated approach was employed to synthesise both quantitative and qualitative data, which is presented in a narrative format.

Results

A total of 4,354 records were identified and screened, and 169 full-text papers were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 20 papers for inclusion. Telehealth acceptability among families was reported in 13 of the 20 studies reviewed, with participants expressing high satisfaction regarding its use as a complement to standard care. Only three studies examined practitioners' acceptance, revealing mixed responses. Effectiveness was observed in 15 studies, with no significant differences found between the control and telehealth groups, suggesting that telehealth may achieve outcomes like those of standard care. Four studies identified both enablers and barriers to the implementation of telehealth, though none addressed concerns regarding safety and appropriateness.

Conclusions

Telehealth shows promise for well-child health services, but there is limited evidence of its effectiveness and safety. The COVID-19 pandemic increased its use, yet risks need further exploration. To validate telehealth in this field, we must identify effective applications, tackle implementation barriers, and ensure client safety. Additional research is essential for developing evidence-based policies for future practices.
儿童保健环境中的远程保健使用。对家庭和从业人员的可接受性和有效性进行系统审查。
背景:在资源丰富的国家,普及儿童保健护理服务可促进儿童和家庭的健康和福祉,同时防止卫生不公平现象。COVID-19大流行和技术进步导致这一领域更多地使用远程医疗。为了加强政策和做法,必须了解远程医疗的可接受性和有效性,以及实施远程医疗的障碍和推动因素,并确定何时使用远程医疗是适当和安全的。目的:探讨在高收入国家儿童健康环境中使用远程医疗的全球证据。重点关注远程保健的有效性和可接受性,以及影响其实施的因素和从提供者和家庭的角度考虑安全问题。设计:采用混合方法进行系统评价。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。审查的纳入标准包括:在高收入国家进行的以英语撰写的主要研究论文,重点关注儿童健康环境中的远程保健,并涉及6岁以下儿童。该检索于2023年7月完成,系统地检索了CINAHL、ProQuest Central、PubMed和Web of Science的书目数据库。对研究的质量进行了严格的评估,并提取了相关数据。采用了一种趋同分离的方法来综合定量和定性数据,这些数据以叙述的形式呈现。结果:共筛选到4354篇文献,对169篇全文论文进行合格性评估,最终纳入20篇论文。在审查的20项研究中,有13项报告了家庭对远程保健的接受程度,参与者对将其作为标准护理的补充表示高度满意。只有三项研究调查了从业者的接受程度,反映出不同的反应。在15项研究中观察到有效性,在对照组和远程保健组之间没有发现显著差异,这表明远程保健可能达到与标准护理类似的结果。四项研究确定了实施远程保健的推动因素和障碍,但没有一项研究涉及安全性和适当性方面的问题。结论:远程医疗显示了良好的儿童保健服务的前景,但其有效性和安全性的证据有限。COVID-19大流行增加了对其的使用,但风险需要进一步探索。为了验证这一领域的远程医疗,我们必须确定有效的应用,解决实施障碍,并确保客户安全。进一步的研究对于为未来的实践制定基于证据的政策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信