Defining cause of death in a contemporary cohort with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV): A comparison of electronic health record and death certificate data

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Guy Katz, Claire E. Cook, Xiaoqing Fu, Andrew J. King, John H. Stone, Hyon K. Choi, Zachary S. Wallace
{"title":"Defining cause of death in a contemporary cohort with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV): A comparison of electronic health record and death certificate data","authors":"Guy Katz,&nbsp;Claire E. Cook,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Fu,&nbsp;Andrew J. King,&nbsp;John H. Stone,&nbsp;Hyon K. Choi,&nbsp;Zachary S. Wallace","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) face excess mortality compared with the general population. Mortality in clinical epidemiology research is often examined using death certificate diagnosis codes; however, the sensitivity of such codes in AAV is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Mass General Brigham AAV Cohort, including patients with AAV who died between 2002 and 2019. Causes of death were determined by electronic health record (EHR) review (reference gold standard) and via cause of death diagnosis codes on death certificates. We calculated the sensitivity of death certificate diagnosis codes for AAV.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 684 patients in the registry, 184 died, 92 (52 %) of whom had adequate EHR data available determine cause of death and 72 (40 %) of whom had both EHR and death certificate data available. Death due to AAV, infection, cardiovascular disease, and cancer occurred in 8 %, 29 %, 5 %, and 18 %, respectively, when ascertained by manual review, as opposed to 0 %, 11 %, 25 %, and 21 %, as determined by death certificates. The sensitivity of AAV diagnosis codes for AAV was 16.6 % (95 % CI: 10.5, 22.6) among all patients with death certificate data available.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In a contemporary cohort of patients with AAV, infection was the most common cause of death, while death due to AAV itself was rare. We found a high degree of discordance between causes of death determined by manual review and death certificate diagnosis codes. Mortality research on AAV should include linkage to medical records data to reduce potential bias.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 152609"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004901722400249X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) face excess mortality compared with the general population. Mortality in clinical epidemiology research is often examined using death certificate diagnosis codes; however, the sensitivity of such codes in AAV is unknown.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Mass General Brigham AAV Cohort, including patients with AAV who died between 2002 and 2019. Causes of death were determined by electronic health record (EHR) review (reference gold standard) and via cause of death diagnosis codes on death certificates. We calculated the sensitivity of death certificate diagnosis codes for AAV.

Results

Of 684 patients in the registry, 184 died, 92 (52 %) of whom had adequate EHR data available determine cause of death and 72 (40 %) of whom had both EHR and death certificate data available. Death due to AAV, infection, cardiovascular disease, and cancer occurred in 8 %, 29 %, 5 %, and 18 %, respectively, when ascertained by manual review, as opposed to 0 %, 11 %, 25 %, and 21 %, as determined by death certificates. The sensitivity of AAV diagnosis codes for AAV was 16.6 % (95 % CI: 10.5, 22.6) among all patients with death certificate data available.

Conclusion

In a contemporary cohort of patients with AAV, infection was the most common cause of death, while death due to AAV itself was rare. We found a high degree of discordance between causes of death determined by manual review and death certificate diagnosis codes. Mortality research on AAV should include linkage to medical records data to reduce potential bias.
确定当代anca相关性血管炎(AAV)队列的死亡原因:电子健康记录和死亡证明数据的比较
目的:与普通人群相比,抗中性粒细胞细胞质抗体(ANCA)相关血管炎(AAV)患者面临更高的死亡率。临床流行病学研究中的死亡率通常使用死亡证明诊断代码进行检查;然而,这种编码在AAV中的敏感性尚不清楚。方法:我们使用麻省总医院布里格姆AAV队列进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括2002年至2019年间死亡的AAV患者。通过电子健康记录(EHR)审查(参考金标准)和死亡证明上的死亡原因诊断代码确定死亡原因。计算AAV死亡证明诊断代码的敏感性。结果:在登记的684例患者中,184例死亡,其中92例(52%)有足够的电子病历数据可用来确定死因,72例(40%)有电子病历和死亡证明数据可用。人工复核确定的AAV、感染、心血管疾病和癌症的死亡率分别为8%、29%、5%和18%,而死亡证明确定的死亡率分别为0%、11%、25%和21%。在所有有死亡证明资料的患者中,AAV诊断代码对AAV的敏感性为16.6% (95% CI: 10.5, 22.6)。结论:在当代AAV患者队列中,感染是最常见的死亡原因,而AAV本身导致的死亡很少见。我们发现人工复核确定的死亡原因与死亡证明诊断代码之间存在高度不一致。AAV的死亡率研究应包括与医疗记录数据的联系,以减少潜在的偏倚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信