Hae Sung Lee , Sang Hun Song , Hakmin Lee , Sung Kyu Hong
{"title":"Whole gland versus partial gland ablation in patients with localized prostate cancer treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation","authors":"Hae Sung Lee , Sang Hun Song , Hakmin Lee , Sung Kyu Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Focal therapy is considered one of the treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PCa), particularly for low or very-low-risk patients. In this study, we compared the mid-term oncological outcomes in localized PCa patients treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 237 patients who underwent HIFU for localized PCa. Patients were divided into two groups based on ablation type: whole gland ablation (WGA) and partial gland ablation (PGA). Follow-up biopsies were performed after one year postoperatively, and the oncological outcomes were compared between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the total of 237 patients, 54 subjects were treated by WGA and 183 subjects by PGA. After one year postoperatively, follow-up biopsies were conducted on 199 patients, revealing residual cancer in 21.4% of WGA group and 15.3% of PGA group. Additionally, clinically significant (CS) cancer was observed in 14.3% of WGA group and 8.3% of PGA group. Survival analyses revealed significantly longer failure-free (<em>P</em> < 0.001) and salvage-free survival (<em>P</em> < 0.001) in WGA group than in PGA group. Similarly, in the intermediate—high risk group, WGA group exhibited longer failure-free (<em>P</em> = 0.005) and salvage-free survival (<em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>HIFU was performed with acceptable oncological outcomes in localized PCa. Despite higher proportion of high-risk patients in WGA group, WGA was associated with significantly better failure-free survival and salvage-free survival. Further prospective and multi-center studies are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"12 4","pages":"Pages 213-218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Focal therapy is considered one of the treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PCa), particularly for low or very-low-risk patients. In this study, we compared the mid-term oncological outcomes in localized PCa patients treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 237 patients who underwent HIFU for localized PCa. Patients were divided into two groups based on ablation type: whole gland ablation (WGA) and partial gland ablation (PGA). Follow-up biopsies were performed after one year postoperatively, and the oncological outcomes were compared between the groups.
Results
Among the total of 237 patients, 54 subjects were treated by WGA and 183 subjects by PGA. After one year postoperatively, follow-up biopsies were conducted on 199 patients, revealing residual cancer in 21.4% of WGA group and 15.3% of PGA group. Additionally, clinically significant (CS) cancer was observed in 14.3% of WGA group and 8.3% of PGA group. Survival analyses revealed significantly longer failure-free (P < 0.001) and salvage-free survival (P < 0.001) in WGA group than in PGA group. Similarly, in the intermediate—high risk group, WGA group exhibited longer failure-free (P = 0.005) and salvage-free survival (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
HIFU was performed with acceptable oncological outcomes in localized PCa. Despite higher proportion of high-risk patients in WGA group, WGA was associated with significantly better failure-free survival and salvage-free survival. Further prospective and multi-center studies are warranted.
背景:局灶性治疗被认为是局部前列腺癌(PCa)的治疗选择之一,特别是对于低或极低风险的患者。在这项研究中,我们比较了局部PCa患者接受高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)治疗的中期肿瘤学结果。方法:回顾性分析237例行HIFU治疗局限性PCa的患者。根据消融类型将患者分为全腺体消融(WGA)和部分腺体消融(PGA)两组。术后1年随访活检,比较两组肿瘤预后。结果:237例患者中,WGA治疗54例,PGA治疗183例。术后1年随访活检199例,WGA组残留癌21.4%,PGA组残留癌15.3%。此外,14.3%的WGA组和8.3%的PGA组出现临床显著性(CS)癌。生存分析显示无故障生存期明显延长(P P P = 0.005),无抢救生存期明显延长(P结论:HIFU治疗局部前列腺癌具有可接受的肿瘤预后。尽管WGA组高危患者比例较高,但WGA组的无衰竭生存期和无抢救生存期明显较好。进一步的前瞻性和多中心研究是必要的。
期刊介绍:
Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...