Autoantibodies in hospitalised patients with COVID-19

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Eleni Tiniakou, Livia Casciola-Rosen, Mekha A Thomas, Yuka Manabe, Annukka AR Antar, Mahendra Damarla, Paul M Hassoun, Li Gao, Zitong Wang, Scott Zeger, Antony Rosen
{"title":"Autoantibodies in hospitalised patients with COVID-19","authors":"Eleni Tiniakou,&nbsp;Livia Casciola-Rosen,&nbsp;Mekha A Thomas,&nbsp;Yuka Manabe,&nbsp;Annukka AR Antar,&nbsp;Mahendra Damarla,&nbsp;Paul M Hassoun,&nbsp;Li Gao,&nbsp;Zitong Wang,&nbsp;Scott Zeger,&nbsp;Antony Rosen","doi":"10.1002/cti2.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>CD209L and its homologous protein CD209 act as alternative entry receptors for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and are highly expressed in the virally targeted tissues. We tested for the presence and clinical features of autoantibodies targeting these receptors and compared these with autoantibodies known to be associated with COVID-19.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using banked samples (<i>n</i> = 118) from Johns Hopkins patients hospitalised with COVID-19, we defined autoantibodies against CD209 and CD209L by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Clinical associations of these antibodies were compared with those of patients with anti-interferon (IFN) and anti-angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) autoantibodies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Amongst patients hospitalised with COVID-19, 19.5% (23/118) had IgM autoantibodies against CD209L and were more likely to have coronary artery disease (44% vs 19%, <i>P</i> = 0.03). Antibodies against CD209 were present in 5.9% (7/118); interestingly, all 7 were male (<i>P</i> = 0.02). In our study, the presence of either antibody was positively associated with disease severity [OR 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.80 (0.69–5.03)], but the association did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, 10/118 (8.5%) had IgG autoantibodies against IFNα, and 21 (17.8%) had IgM antibodies against ACE2. These patients had significantly worse prognosis (intubation or death) and prolonged hospital stays. However, when adjusting for patient characteristics on admission, only the presence of anti-ACE2 IgM remained significant [pooled common OR (95% CI), 4.14 (1.37, 12.54)].</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We describe IgM autoantibodies against CD209 and CD209L amongst patients hospitalised with COVID-19. These were not associated with disease severity. Conversely, patients with either anti-ACE2 IgM or anti-IFNα IgG antibodies had worse outcomes. Due to the small size of the study cohort, conclusions drawn should be considered cautiously.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":152,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Immunology","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cti2.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

CD209L and its homologous protein CD209 act as alternative entry receptors for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and are highly expressed in the virally targeted tissues. We tested for the presence and clinical features of autoantibodies targeting these receptors and compared these with autoantibodies known to be associated with COVID-19.

Methods

Using banked samples (n = 118) from Johns Hopkins patients hospitalised with COVID-19, we defined autoantibodies against CD209 and CD209L by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Clinical associations of these antibodies were compared with those of patients with anti-interferon (IFN) and anti-angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) autoantibodies.

Results

Amongst patients hospitalised with COVID-19, 19.5% (23/118) had IgM autoantibodies against CD209L and were more likely to have coronary artery disease (44% vs 19%, P = 0.03). Antibodies against CD209 were present in 5.9% (7/118); interestingly, all 7 were male (P = 0.02). In our study, the presence of either antibody was positively associated with disease severity [OR 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.80 (0.69–5.03)], but the association did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, 10/118 (8.5%) had IgG autoantibodies against IFNα, and 21 (17.8%) had IgM antibodies against ACE2. These patients had significantly worse prognosis (intubation or death) and prolonged hospital stays. However, when adjusting for patient characteristics on admission, only the presence of anti-ACE2 IgM remained significant [pooled common OR (95% CI), 4.14 (1.37, 12.54)].

Conclusion

We describe IgM autoantibodies against CD209 and CD209L amongst patients hospitalised with COVID-19. These were not associated with disease severity. Conversely, patients with either anti-ACE2 IgM or anti-IFNα IgG antibodies had worse outcomes. Due to the small size of the study cohort, conclusions drawn should be considered cautiously.

Abstract Image

COVID-19住院患者的自身抗体
目的:CD209L及其同源蛋白CD209作为SARS-CoV-2病毒的替代进入受体,在病毒靶向组织中高度表达。我们测试了针对这些受体的自身抗体的存在和临床特征,并将这些抗体与已知与COVID-19相关的自身抗体进行了比较。方法:使用约翰霍普金斯大学新冠肺炎住院患者的118份样本,采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)确定CD209和CD209L自身抗体。将这些抗体与抗干扰素(IFN)和抗血管紧张素转换酶-2 (ACE2)自身抗体患者的临床相关性进行比较。结果:在因COVID-19住院的患者中,19.5%(23/118)存在针对CD209L的IgM自身抗体,更容易发生冠状动脉疾病(44% vs 19%, P = 0.03)。CD209抗体阳性率为5.9% (7/118);有趣的是,所有7人均为男性(P = 0.02)。在我们的研究中,两种抗体的存在均与疾病严重程度呈正相关[OR 95%可信区间(95% CI): 1.80(0.69-5.03)],但相关性未达到统计学意义。10/118(8.5%)有抗IFNα的IgG抗体,21(17.8%)有抗ACE2的IgM抗体。这些患者预后明显较差(插管或死亡),住院时间延长。然而,当调整入院时的患者特征时,只有抗ace2 IgM的存在仍然显著[合并常见OR (95% CI), 4.14(1.37, 12.54)]。结论:我们在COVID-19住院患者中发现了针对CD209和CD209L的IgM自身抗体。这些与疾病严重程度无关。相反,抗ace2 IgM或抗ifn α IgG抗体的患者预后较差。由于研究队列的规模较小,得出的结论应谨慎考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical & Translational Immunology
Clinical & Translational Immunology Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.70%
发文量
77
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Translational Immunology is an open access, fully peer-reviewed journal devoted to publishing cutting-edge advances in biomedical research for scientists and physicians. The Journal covers fields including cancer biology, cardiovascular research, gene therapy, immunology, vaccine development and disease pathogenesis and therapy at the earliest phases of investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信