{"title":"A total Lagrangian‒Riemann SPH method with MUSCL reconstruction for large elastic‒plastic deformation and fracture simulation","authors":"Longkui Chen , Zhanming Wang , Shenghong Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.106083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method possesses inherent advantages in simulating large deformations, fractures and crack propagations in solids. However, challenging issues, including tensile instability and numerical oscillations, persist. Total Lagrangian smooth particle hydrodynamics (TLSPH) was proposed to eliminate tensile instability by applying the kernel approximation consistently in the reference configuration; however, the artificial viscosity model has to be added to reduce the numerical oscillation induced by shock and other contact discontinuity simulations, which severely decreases its accuracy and robustness. Motivated by the advantages of both TLSPH and Riemann-SPH of the ULSPH frame, a second-order solid Riemann scheme is constructed on the basis of the Monotone Upwind-Centered Scheme for Conservation Laws (MUSCL) reconstruction and incorporated into the total Lagrangian SPH (TLSPH) framework. The resulting MUSCL-TLSPH method is designed for solving dynamic elastic‒plastic structural impact problems, including large deformations and fractures. This method effectively overcomes the challenges faced by traditional SPH approaches, eliminating the need to introduce artificial stresses related to tunable parameters to maintain computational stability. Finally, the accuracy and robustness of the MUSCL-TLSPH method presented in this paper are verified through a series of numerical validations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51039,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 106083"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955799724005563","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method possesses inherent advantages in simulating large deformations, fractures and crack propagations in solids. However, challenging issues, including tensile instability and numerical oscillations, persist. Total Lagrangian smooth particle hydrodynamics (TLSPH) was proposed to eliminate tensile instability by applying the kernel approximation consistently in the reference configuration; however, the artificial viscosity model has to be added to reduce the numerical oscillation induced by shock and other contact discontinuity simulations, which severely decreases its accuracy and robustness. Motivated by the advantages of both TLSPH and Riemann-SPH of the ULSPH frame, a second-order solid Riemann scheme is constructed on the basis of the Monotone Upwind-Centered Scheme for Conservation Laws (MUSCL) reconstruction and incorporated into the total Lagrangian SPH (TLSPH) framework. The resulting MUSCL-TLSPH method is designed for solving dynamic elastic‒plastic structural impact problems, including large deformations and fractures. This method effectively overcomes the challenges faced by traditional SPH approaches, eliminating the need to introduce artificial stresses related to tunable parameters to maintain computational stability. Finally, the accuracy and robustness of the MUSCL-TLSPH method presented in this paper are verified through a series of numerical validations.
期刊介绍:
This journal is specifically dedicated to the dissemination of the latest developments of new engineering analysis techniques using boundary elements and other mesh reduction methods.
Boundary element (BEM) and mesh reduction methods (MRM) are very active areas of research with the techniques being applied to solve increasingly complex problems. The journal stresses the importance of these applications as well as their computational aspects, reliability and robustness.
The main criteria for publication will be the originality of the work being reported, its potential usefulness and applications of the methods to new fields.
In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes a series of special issues dealing with specific areas of current research.
The journal has, for many years, provided a channel of communication between academics and industrial researchers working in mesh reduction methods
Fields Covered:
• Boundary Element Methods (BEM)
• Mesh Reduction Methods (MRM)
• Meshless Methods
• Integral Equations
• Applications of BEM/MRM in Engineering
• Numerical Methods related to BEM/MRM
• Computational Techniques
• Combination of Different Methods
• Advanced Formulations.