Automatic calculation method for stenosis ratio based on dialysis access ultrasound image segmentation

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1002/mp.17579
Fengxin Shi, Dongming Zhu, Jia Zhi, Guocun Hou, Yaoyao Cui, Xiaocong Wang
{"title":"Automatic calculation method for stenosis ratio based on dialysis access ultrasound image segmentation","authors":"Fengxin Shi,&nbsp;Dongming Zhu,&nbsp;Jia Zhi,&nbsp;Guocun Hou,&nbsp;Yaoyao Cui,&nbsp;Xiaocong Wang","doi":"10.1002/mp.17579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dialysis Access (DA) stenosis impacts hemodialysis efficiency and patient health, necessitating exams for early lesion detection. Ultrasound is widely used due to its non-invasive, cost-effective nature. Assessing all patients in large hemodialysis facilities strains resources and relies on operator expertise. Furthermore, it heavily relies on the experience and expertise of the operator. Therefore, it is essential to explore methods for the automatic analysis of DA ultrasound images to accurately calculate the stenosis ratios, thereby enhancing both diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study is aimed at employing image segmentation networks to conduct precise segmentation of the ultrasound images of DA lumens and automatically classify the types of stenosis. The segmentation outcomes are processed by means of morphological processing techniques for the automatic calculation of the DA stenosis ratio, thus enhancing the daily diagnostic efficiency of physicians and providing a substantial quantitative foundation for clinical decision-making.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Firstly, our study introduces a deep neural network-based approach for vascular lumen segmentation and classification, termed Vessel Lumen Segmentation and Classification-Net (VLSC-Net), aimed at the precise segmentation of the DA lumen in ultrasound images. We conducted comparative analyses of our network against U-Net, TransUNet, MultiResUnet, and ResUNet using metrics such as mean Intersection over Union (mIoU), Dice score, Accuracy, Hausdorff Distance (HD), and Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD). A five-fold cross-validation was performed on a dataset comprising 1710 images for both comparison experiments and ablation studies; specifically, the training set included 1368 images while the test set contained 342 images. The significance of observed differences was assessed using the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test. To prevent the increase in the chance of making a Type I error (false positive) that occurs when many simultaneous tests are being conducted, we used the Bonferroni correction to address the problem of multiple comparisons. Since we did four groups of comparisons, the significance level (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>α</mi>\n <annotation>$\\alpha$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) is adjusted by dividing it by 4. Secondly, we utilized morphological processing alongside feature extraction techniques to accurately delineate the edges of the lumen. This facilitated precise measurements of critical stenosis segment parameters. Finally, we automatically calculated the Long-axis Diameter Stenosis Ratio (LDSR) and Short-axis Area Stenosis Ratio (SASR) utilizing methods from the European Carotid Surgery Trial based on parameters derived from these calculations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>VLSC-Net demonstrated superior performance compared with traditional segmentation methods, effectively handling image artifacts while maintaining a compact structure. The mIoU, Dice score, Accuracy, HD, and ASSD were 0.9563, 0.9777, 0.9976, 4.542, and 0.460, respectively, and showed significant differences from the results of U-Net (<i>p</i><span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>&lt;</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\,&lt;$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 0.0125). An evaluation involving 1710 images from 62 patients indicated that our method delivers high-precision and reliable stenosis ratio and classification outcomes within an average processing time of 164 ms. Furthermore, the average errors for LDSR and SASR were found to be 1.4% and 7.8%, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our approach greatly enhances diagnostic efficiency for medical personnel, offering reliable and objective evidence for clinical assessment and decision-making in DA stenosis treatment, thereby reducing the risk of complications associated with DA stenosis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 3","pages":"1661-1678"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Dialysis Access (DA) stenosis impacts hemodialysis efficiency and patient health, necessitating exams for early lesion detection. Ultrasound is widely used due to its non-invasive, cost-effective nature. Assessing all patients in large hemodialysis facilities strains resources and relies on operator expertise. Furthermore, it heavily relies on the experience and expertise of the operator. Therefore, it is essential to explore methods for the automatic analysis of DA ultrasound images to accurately calculate the stenosis ratios, thereby enhancing both diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency.

Purpose

This study is aimed at employing image segmentation networks to conduct precise segmentation of the ultrasound images of DA lumens and automatically classify the types of stenosis. The segmentation outcomes are processed by means of morphological processing techniques for the automatic calculation of the DA stenosis ratio, thus enhancing the daily diagnostic efficiency of physicians and providing a substantial quantitative foundation for clinical decision-making.

Methods

Firstly, our study introduces a deep neural network-based approach for vascular lumen segmentation and classification, termed Vessel Lumen Segmentation and Classification-Net (VLSC-Net), aimed at the precise segmentation of the DA lumen in ultrasound images. We conducted comparative analyses of our network against U-Net, TransUNet, MultiResUnet, and ResUNet using metrics such as mean Intersection over Union (mIoU), Dice score, Accuracy, Hausdorff Distance (HD), and Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD). A five-fold cross-validation was performed on a dataset comprising 1710 images for both comparison experiments and ablation studies; specifically, the training set included 1368 images while the test set contained 342 images. The significance of observed differences was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. To prevent the increase in the chance of making a Type I error (false positive) that occurs when many simultaneous tests are being conducted, we used the Bonferroni correction to address the problem of multiple comparisons. Since we did four groups of comparisons, the significance level ( α $\alpha$ ) is adjusted by dividing it by 4. Secondly, we utilized morphological processing alongside feature extraction techniques to accurately delineate the edges of the lumen. This facilitated precise measurements of critical stenosis segment parameters. Finally, we automatically calculated the Long-axis Diameter Stenosis Ratio (LDSR) and Short-axis Area Stenosis Ratio (SASR) utilizing methods from the European Carotid Surgery Trial based on parameters derived from these calculations.

Results

VLSC-Net demonstrated superior performance compared with traditional segmentation methods, effectively handling image artifacts while maintaining a compact structure. The mIoU, Dice score, Accuracy, HD, and ASSD were 0.9563, 0.9777, 0.9976, 4.542, and 0.460, respectively, and showed significant differences from the results of U-Net (p < $\,<$  0.0125). An evaluation involving 1710 images from 62 patients indicated that our method delivers high-precision and reliable stenosis ratio and classification outcomes within an average processing time of 164 ms. Furthermore, the average errors for LDSR and SASR were found to be 1.4% and 7.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

Our approach greatly enhances diagnostic efficiency for medical personnel, offering reliable and objective evidence for clinical assessment and decision-making in DA stenosis treatment, thereby reducing the risk of complications associated with DA stenosis.

基于透析通道超声图像分割的狭窄比自动计算方法。
背景:透析通道(DA)狭窄影响血液透析效率和患者健康,需要检查以早期发现病变。超声以其无创、低成本的特点被广泛应用。评估大型血液透析设施中的所有患者会使资源紧张,并依赖于操作人员的专业知识。此外,它在很大程度上依赖于操作人员的经验和专业知识。因此,探索DA超声图像的自动分析方法,准确计算狭窄比例,从而提高诊断准确性和治疗效率是十分必要的。目的:本研究旨在利用图像分割网络对DA管腔超声图像进行精确分割,自动分类狭窄类型。通过形态学处理技术对分割结果进行处理,自动计算DA狭窄率,从而提高了医生的日常诊断效率,为临床决策提供了实质性的定量依据。方法:首先,我们的研究引入了一种基于深度神经网络的血管腔分割和分类方法,称为血管腔分割和分类网络(VLSC-Net),旨在精确分割超声图像中的DA管腔。我们使用诸如平均交联(mIoU)、骰子分数、精度、豪斯多夫距离(HD)和平均对称表面距离(ASSD)等指标,对我们的网络与U-Net、TransUNet、MultiResUnet和ResUNet进行了比较分析。对包含1710张图像的数据集进行了五倍交叉验证,用于比较实验和消融研究;具体来说,训练集包含1368张图像,而测试集包含342张图像。采用Mann-Whitney u检验评估观察到的差异的显著性。为了防止在进行许多同时进行的测试时出现I型错误(假阳性)的机会增加,我们使用Bonferroni校正来解决多次比较的问题。由于我们做了四组比较,显著性水平(α $\ α $)通过除以4来调整。其次,我们利用形态学处理和特征提取技术来准确地描绘腔体的边缘。这有助于精确测量关键狭窄段参数。最后,我们根据这些计算得出的参数,利用欧洲颈动脉手术试验的方法自动计算出长轴直径狭窄比(LDSR)和短轴面积狭窄比(SASR)。结果:与传统分割方法相比,VLSC-Net在保持图像结构紧凑的同时,有效地处理了图像伪影。mIoU、Dice评分、Accuracy、HD、ASSD分别为0.9563、0.9777、0.9976、4.542、0.460,与U-Net结果差异有统计学意义(p $\, 0.0125)。对来自62例患者的1710张图像的评估表明,我们的方法在平均处理时间164 ms内提供了高精度和可靠的狭窄比率和分类结果。LDSR和SASR的平均误差分别为1.4%和7.8%。结论:我们的方法大大提高了医务人员的诊断效率,为DA狭窄治疗的临床评估和决策提供了可靠、客观的依据,从而降低了DA狭窄相关并发症的发生风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信