Big brother or big opportunity? Utilization of EHR use metadata in the inpatient setting: A mixed methods study at 16 organizations.

Marisha Burden, Angela Keniston, Lauren McBeth, Gopi Astik, Kirsten N Kangelaris, Aveena Kochar, Michelle Knees, Ankur Segon, Sara Westergaard, Amy Yu, Matthew Sakumoto, Romil Chadha
{"title":"Big brother or big opportunity? Utilization of EHR use metadata in the inpatient setting: A mixed methods study at 16 organizations.","authors":"Marisha Burden, Angela Keniston, Lauren McBeth, Gopi Astik, Kirsten N Kangelaris, Aveena Kochar, Michelle Knees, Ankur Segon, Sara Westergaard, Amy Yu, Matthew Sakumoto, Romil Chadha","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinician electronic actions within the electronic health record (EHR) are captured seamlessly in real-time during regular work activities in all major EHRs. Analysis of this EHR use metadata, such as audit log data, is increasingly used to understand the impact of work design on critical patient, workforce, and organizational outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Understand experiences and perspectives influencing the use and implementation of audit log data into practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methods design utilizing focus groups and embedded survey with hospitalist group leaders attending a national society special interest group. Themes and subthemes were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven semistructured virtual focus groups were held with 16 individuals from 16 different organizations on December 12, 2023, with a 100% survey response rate. Survey results highlighted the lack of familiarity with audit log data, the lack of tools and training for use, and the lack of established protocols to respond to insights, with some concerns for the accuracy of the data. Four themes and multiple subthemes were identified and included: (1) Limited, but widely variable use of audit log data driven by a lack of access, resources, skills, and knowledge, (2) mistrust and skepticism about the data, including concerns about potential misuse and a lack of best practices and standards, (3) perspectives around audit log data are culture and context driven, and (4) excitement for the many potential use cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite all major EHRs having audit log data, participants had limited access, training, and knowledge. Although there was mistrust, many opportunities were identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinician electronic actions within the electronic health record (EHR) are captured seamlessly in real-time during regular work activities in all major EHRs. Analysis of this EHR use metadata, such as audit log data, is increasingly used to understand the impact of work design on critical patient, workforce, and organizational outcomes.

Objective: Understand experiences and perspectives influencing the use and implementation of audit log data into practice.

Methods: Mixed methods design utilizing focus groups and embedded survey with hospitalist group leaders attending a national society special interest group. Themes and subthemes were identified.

Results: Seven semistructured virtual focus groups were held with 16 individuals from 16 different organizations on December 12, 2023, with a 100% survey response rate. Survey results highlighted the lack of familiarity with audit log data, the lack of tools and training for use, and the lack of established protocols to respond to insights, with some concerns for the accuracy of the data. Four themes and multiple subthemes were identified and included: (1) Limited, but widely variable use of audit log data driven by a lack of access, resources, skills, and knowledge, (2) mistrust and skepticism about the data, including concerns about potential misuse and a lack of best practices and standards, (3) perspectives around audit log data are culture and context driven, and (4) excitement for the many potential use cases.

Conclusion: Despite all major EHRs having audit log data, participants had limited access, training, and knowledge. Although there was mistrust, many opportunities were identified.

老大哥还是大机遇?在住院环境中使用电子病历使用元数据:对 16 家机构进行的混合方法研究。
背景:临床医生在电子健康记录(EHR)中的电子动作在所有主要的电子健康记录系统的日常工作活动中被无缝地实时捕获。对这种EHR使用元数据(如审计日志数据)的分析越来越多地用于了解工作设计对关键患者、员工和组织结果的影响。目的:了解影响审计日志数据在实践中使用和实施的经验和观点。方法:采用焦点小组和嵌入式调查的混合方法设计,与参加国家学会特殊兴趣小组的医院小组组长进行调查。确定了主题和次级主题。结果:在2023年12月12日,我们对来自16个不同组织的16个人进行了7个半结构化的虚拟焦点小组,调查回复率为100%。调查结果强调,审计人员对审计日志数据不熟悉,缺乏工具和使用培训,缺乏既定的协议来响应见解,以及对数据准确性的一些担忧。确定并包括四个主题和多个子主题:(1)由于缺乏访问、资源、技能和知识,审计日志数据的使用有限,但广泛变化;(2)对数据的不信任和怀疑,包括对潜在滥用和缺乏最佳实践和标准的担忧;(3)围绕审计日志数据的观点是文化和上下文驱动的;(4)对许多潜在用例的兴奋。结论:尽管所有主要的电子病历都有审计日志数据,但参与者的访问权限、培训和知识都有限。虽然存在不信任,但还是发现了许多机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信