Evaluation of Bone Loss in Implants Adjacent to a Tooth or Edentulous Area in Peri-Implantitis and Control Murine Models.

Taciane Menezes da Silveira, Davi Neto de Araújo Silva, Maísa Casarin, Sepehr Monajemzadeh, Jaclyn Chalmers, Flavia Q Pirih
{"title":"Evaluation of Bone Loss in Implants Adjacent to a Tooth or Edentulous Area in Peri-Implantitis and Control Murine Models.","authors":"Taciane Menezes da Silveira, Davi Neto de Araújo Silva, Maísa Casarin, Sepehr Monajemzadeh, Jaclyn Chalmers, Flavia Q Pirih","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peri-implantitis (PI) is an inflammatory disease that affects supportive tissues around dental implants, and its progression eventually leads to bone loss and implant failure. However, PI effects may be different based on the presence or absence of adjacent teeth. The objective was to investigate the differences in bone loss and inflammation between implants placed adjacent to a tooth or edentulous area in a ligature-induced PI model. Materials and methods include the following: Three-week-old C57BL/6J male mice underwent maxillary first (AT; n = 12) or first and second (AE; n = 8) left molar extractions. In both groups, implants were placed in the first molar region 8 weeks after tooth extraction. Each group was further divided into control (C) or ligature (PI) 4 weeks after osseointegration. The mice were euthanized 12-14 days after ligature placement. The samples were analyzed using micro-computed tomography and histology. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparison test (P < .05). Radiographic linear analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in bone levels between the two C and PI groups. Linear bone loss was significantly greater in the PI group than in the C group. Volumetric analysis yielded similar results. Histologically, hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed no notable differences between the two C and PI groups. The PI groups showed increased levels of inflammatory infiltrates and bone resorption. Qualitative assessment of collagen through picrosirius red staining demonstrated increased collagen disorganization in the PI group compared with that in the C group. No notable differences were observed between the AT and AE groups. The presence or absence of an adjacent tooth does not influence PI-induced soft and hard tissue alterations.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":" ","pages":"98-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peri-implantitis (PI) is an inflammatory disease that affects supportive tissues around dental implants, and its progression eventually leads to bone loss and implant failure. However, PI effects may be different based on the presence or absence of adjacent teeth. The objective was to investigate the differences in bone loss and inflammation between implants placed adjacent to a tooth or edentulous area in a ligature-induced PI model. Materials and methods include the following: Three-week-old C57BL/6J male mice underwent maxillary first (AT; n = 12) or first and second (AE; n = 8) left molar extractions. In both groups, implants were placed in the first molar region 8 weeks after tooth extraction. Each group was further divided into control (C) or ligature (PI) 4 weeks after osseointegration. The mice were euthanized 12-14 days after ligature placement. The samples were analyzed using micro-computed tomography and histology. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparison test (P < .05). Radiographic linear analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in bone levels between the two C and PI groups. Linear bone loss was significantly greater in the PI group than in the C group. Volumetric analysis yielded similar results. Histologically, hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed no notable differences between the two C and PI groups. The PI groups showed increased levels of inflammatory infiltrates and bone resorption. Qualitative assessment of collagen through picrosirius red staining demonstrated increased collagen disorganization in the PI group compared with that in the C group. No notable differences were observed between the AT and AE groups. The presence or absence of an adjacent tooth does not influence PI-induced soft and hard tissue alterations.

评估种植体周围炎和对照小鼠模型中邻近牙齿或无牙区种植体的骨损失。
种植体周围炎(PI)是一种影响牙种植体周围支持组织的炎症性疾病,其进展最终导致骨质流失和种植体失效。然而,PI的效果可能会因邻近牙齿的存在或缺失而有所不同。目的:探讨在结扎诱导的PI模型中,种植体靠近牙齿或无牙区在骨丢失和炎症方面的差异。材料与方法:三周龄C57BL/6J雄性小鼠上颌首次(AT);n=12)或第一和第二(AE;N =8)左磨牙拔牙。在两组中,种植体在拔牙后8周放置在第一磨牙区域。每组在骨融合4周后进一步分为对照组(C)和结扎组(PI)。结扎后12-14天对小鼠实施安乐死。使用显微计算机断层扫描和组织学对样品进行分析。采用方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验进行统计学分析(结果:x线分析显示C组和PI组骨水平无统计学差异。PI组线性骨丢失明显大于C组。体积分析也得出了类似的结果。组织学上,苏木精和伊红染色显示C组和PI组之间无显著差异。PI组显示炎症浸润和骨吸收水平升高。通过小天狼星红染色对胶原质进行定性评价显示,与C组相比,PI组胶原组织紊乱增加。AT组与AE组间无显著差异。结论:邻牙的存在与否不影响pi诱导的软硬组织改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信