Childhood trauma and dissociation in patients with panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and borderline personality disorder. Part 2: Therapeutic effectiveness of combined cognitive behavioural therapy and pharmacotherapy in treatment-resistant inpatients.

Neuro endocrinology letters Pub Date : 2024-12-10
Krystof Kantor, Jan Prasko, Kamila Belohradova, Jakub Vanek, Frantisek Hodny, Antonin Kolek, Marie Ociskova
{"title":"Childhood trauma and dissociation in patients with panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and borderline personality disorder. Part 2: Therapeutic effectiveness of combined cognitive behavioural therapy and pharmacotherapy in treatment-resistant inpatients.","authors":"Krystof Kantor, Jan Prasko, Kamila Belohradova, Jakub Vanek, Frantisek Hodny, Antonin Kolek, Marie Ociskova","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>PAdverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are associated with an increased risk of mental health issues in general, but their relationship with panic disorder (PD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has received less attention compared to borderline personality disorder (BPD). Dissociative experiences are significant predictors of increased symptoms, reduced treatment adherence, and poor prognosis in several psychiatric conditions, including PD, OCD, and BPD; still, their impact remains underexplored. This part of the study focuses on the overall efficiency of psychotherapeutic programs on treatment-resistant patients diagnosed with PD, OCD, and BPD (or combined), as well as the relationship between ACEs, dissociation rates, and treatment results.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was conducted under standard conditions in an inpatient psychotherapy unit that specialized in anxiety, affective disorders, and personality disorders. Patients were hospitalized for 6 weeks and treated with a comprehensive CBT program and pharmacotherapy. The study included patients diagnosed with PD, OCD, or BPD (or combined). Two independent psychiatrists confirmed the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S), Dissociative Experience Scale (DES), and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-SF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 349 out of 357 patients completed the study. The average age of patients was 33.33 ± 11.59 years. After the 6 week treatment, there was a statistically significant decrease in mean scores across all assessed scales. Changes in any scale during treatment did not correlate with the total CTQ-SF score or sub-scores. The relative change in CGI-S showed a statistically significant negative correlation with the total dissociation score on the DES scale at the beginning of treatment but not with pathological dissociation assessed by the DES-T questionnaire. Statistically significant decreases in mean CGI-S scores were observed in patients with a single diagnosis of PD, OCD, and BPD. Among comorbid groups, significant changes were observed only in patients with comorbid OCD and BPD. No statistically significant change in mean BDI-II scores was observed in patients with comorbid PD and OCD or comorbid OCD and BPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis showed that treatment led to a significant decrease in the severity of depressive symptoms assessed by BDI-II and anxiety symptoms assessed by BAI in patients with PD, OCD, and BPD. This decrease was not statistically significant in patients with comorbid disorders, suggesting that the presence of multiple diagnoses may affect treatment efficacy. ACEs did not correlate to treatment results, but dissociation rates were linked with poorer treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94154,"journal":{"name":"Neuro endocrinology letters","volume":"45 6","pages":"379-392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro endocrinology letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: PAdverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are associated with an increased risk of mental health issues in general, but their relationship with panic disorder (PD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has received less attention compared to borderline personality disorder (BPD). Dissociative experiences are significant predictors of increased symptoms, reduced treatment adherence, and poor prognosis in several psychiatric conditions, including PD, OCD, and BPD; still, their impact remains underexplored. This part of the study focuses on the overall efficiency of psychotherapeutic programs on treatment-resistant patients diagnosed with PD, OCD, and BPD (or combined), as well as the relationship between ACEs, dissociation rates, and treatment results.

Method: The study was conducted under standard conditions in an inpatient psychotherapy unit that specialized in anxiety, affective disorders, and personality disorders. Patients were hospitalized for 6 weeks and treated with a comprehensive CBT program and pharmacotherapy. The study included patients diagnosed with PD, OCD, or BPD (or combined). Two independent psychiatrists confirmed the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S), Dissociative Experience Scale (DES), and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-SF).

Results: A total of 349 out of 357 patients completed the study. The average age of patients was 33.33 ± 11.59 years. After the 6 week treatment, there was a statistically significant decrease in mean scores across all assessed scales. Changes in any scale during treatment did not correlate with the total CTQ-SF score or sub-scores. The relative change in CGI-S showed a statistically significant negative correlation with the total dissociation score on the DES scale at the beginning of treatment but not with pathological dissociation assessed by the DES-T questionnaire. Statistically significant decreases in mean CGI-S scores were observed in patients with a single diagnosis of PD, OCD, and BPD. Among comorbid groups, significant changes were observed only in patients with comorbid OCD and BPD. No statistically significant change in mean BDI-II scores was observed in patients with comorbid PD and OCD or comorbid OCD and BPD.

Conclusions: Our analysis showed that treatment led to a significant decrease in the severity of depressive symptoms assessed by BDI-II and anxiety symptoms assessed by BAI in patients with PD, OCD, and BPD. This decrease was not statistically significant in patients with comorbid disorders, suggesting that the presence of multiple diagnoses may affect treatment efficacy. ACEs did not correlate to treatment results, but dissociation rates were linked with poorer treatment outcomes.

惊恐障碍、强迫症和边缘型人格障碍患者的童年创伤和分离。第二部分:认知行为疗法与药物疗法联合治疗难治性住院患者的疗效。
不良童年经历(ace)通常与心理健康问题的风险增加有关,但与边缘性人格障碍(BPD)相比,它们与恐慌障碍(PD)和强迫症(OCD)的关系受到的关注较少。解离经历是几种精神疾病(包括PD、OCD和BPD)症状加重、治疗依从性降低和预后不良的重要预测因素;尽管如此,它们的影响仍未得到充分探索。这部分研究的重点是心理治疗方案对诊断为PD、OCD和BPD(或合并)的难治性患者的总体效率,以及ace、解离率和治疗结果之间的关系。方法:本研究在标准条件下在一个专门治疗焦虑、情感障碍和人格障碍的住院心理治疗单位进行。患者住院6周,接受综合CBT计划和药物治疗。该研究包括诊断为PD, OCD或BPD(或合并)的患者。两位独立的精神科医生确认了纳入和排除标准。采用贝克焦虑量表(BAI)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)、临床总体印象量表-严重程度量表(CGI-S)、分离体验量表(DES)和儿童创伤问卷(CTQ-SF)对患者进行评估。结果:357例患者中有349例完成了研究。患者平均年龄33.33±11.59岁。治疗6周后,所有评估量表的平均得分均有统计学显著下降。治疗期间任何量表的变化与CTQ-SF总分或分值无关。CGI-S的相对变化与治疗开始时DES量表总解离评分呈显著负相关,而与DES- t问卷评估的病理解离无显著负相关。在诊断为PD、OCD和BPD的患者中,平均CGI-S评分有统计学意义的下降。在合并症组中,仅在OCD和BPD合并症患者中观察到显著变化。PD合并强迫症患者或OCD合并BPD患者的BDI-II平均评分无统计学意义变化。结论:我们的分析表明,治疗导致PD、OCD和BPD患者的BDI-II评估的抑郁症状的严重程度和BAI评估的焦虑症状的严重程度显著降低。这种减少在有合并症的患者中没有统计学意义,这表明多重诊断的存在可能会影响治疗效果。ace与治疗结果无关,但解离率与较差的治疗结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信